Those of you who don't like/don't use MFL

[Ziachild007]

Zia, I'm just kidding. I really don't know what a Fanball or RTsports site looks like. The only software I've ever used is FLM, MFL, XTreme & Yahoo. Maybe one other I can't think of, but that's it. I am honestly interested in seeing what other league softwares look like. Not because I want to switch, but I'd like to see what I'm missing out on. I do find it funny though that some people say that CBS is so much better, yet I see so many people having trouble with the site. I just don't see how it can possibly be that much better for the price they ask.

 

I have always thought that CBS sucked balls. Yahoo and ESPN are OK for free leagues, IMO mainly because like someone said you get what you pay for. So if I am not going to pay for a league, I don't really have mush room to gripe. I've never used RTS, but have heard it is OK. My local uses fanball and they all seem to be happy with it, but I have seen them have their share of problems as well, mainly in live draft mode. But I also think that Fanball has been much better since they were bought out last year. Again just my opinion, please do not me.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited October 16, 2006 by Ziachild007

[Bronco Billy]

 

I still have a league on sportsline, and I know why some people prefer it, and it costs about $2 per owner more than MFL, which is hardly breaking the bank.

 

Not to be demeaning, but how many teams do you have in your league? I wasn't aware of CBS supporting 30 team leagues, which is about what you'd have tro have to get a $2/team difference. I prefer to put that $60/$70 difference in owners' pockets rather than CBS's coffers.

[nhoops]

You can do a full league setup without paying a dime. Once it's set up all you have to do is pay & the league becomes active. Here's the link.

 

Thanks.... and from the looks of it we can set waivers to run how we've been used to.....I'll have to present this to the league for next year.