Favre of Kitna?

[malta69]

Favre vs. Phila.

Kitna @ Det.

 

I've been going back and forth on who to start in my 12 team H2H Peformance based scoring. Basically I want to go with the guy who will have the better completion percentage and throw the fewest INT's. Neither matchup is very favorable although I think I'm leaning towards playing Favre. Any thoughts here?

[Snyper]

You drafted Kitna before Favre correct so you must think he has more potential. I am I die hard Packer fan and I still say go Kitna here. Green Bay has no proven running game and Jennings is going to out as well. The number 3 wide reciever is going to be "Hi my name is ..."

Both face tough machups but go with the one with the better recievers.

[luke davenport]

The Raiders D is better than most people think. I think Kitna struggles on the road/grass today. While GB does have the injuries, I like Favre to pull one out using whatever is there.

[Chavez]

The Raiders D is better than most people think.

"Most people" seem to think it's the reincarnation of the '85 Bears.

 

IMO the Raiders' D is a bit worse than the conventional wisdom says. Both QBs lack a run game. Both face defenses that, if not necessarily are top-notch, can wreak havoc on an offense.

 

I'd say it's really a coin flip. McCarthy will be more conservative than Martz, but that may just mean Kitna turns the ball over more and gets the crap kicked out of him while Favre goes 22-25 for 170 yds.

 

As Snyper says, you drafted one guy higher than the other for some reason. Go with that guy.