jonw15 Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 I'd trade Ronnie Brown, Deion Branch, Larry Fitz, and Ravens D for Rudi Johnson, L. Coles, Ronald Curry, and Jags D. Should I or not? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homebrewer Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 hard to say w/o knowing your scoring system and esp the rest of your roster. the only upgrade you get is at rb. i think you give away some at wr and alot at def. if def's in your league can score more than the usual pts i wouldnt do it. if def's are limited then its 50-50 but i probably wouldnt. curry may just be 1wk wonder and coles is getting a new qb. Jax def looked bad also. you're giving up alot for rudi. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Country Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 I probably wouldn't. Brown vs. Rudi - to oearly to call. Rudi is generally as steady as they come over the season, Ronnie has a wider range but I say they end up relatively close stat wise. Branch and Fitz. vs. Coles and Curry - Fitz side way ahead IMO. He is the only real stud, and Branch can be a solid weekly contributor, especially with Hackett out and not threatening to be the #1 WR. Coles is a solid option, but Curry is far from it despite a strong week one. He may finally be reaching his potential, but even so that potential is no match for what Fitz should certainly do this year. Ravens vs. Jags - Ravens should be a top D, Jags not a bad option but not at the Ravens level. IMO, the Brown/Fitz/Ravens/Braanch side is giving up way too much and receiving way too little to warrant a deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sturphy Posted September 13, 2007 Share Posted September 13, 2007 I probably wouldn't. Brown vs. Rudi - to oearly to call. Rudi is generally as steady as they come over the season, Ronnie has a wider range but I say they end up relatively close stat wise. Branch and Fitz. vs. Coles and Curry - Fitz side way ahead IMO. He is the only real stud, and Branch can be a solid weekly contributor, especially with Hackett out and not threatening to be the #1 WR. Coles is a solid option, but Curry is far from it despite a strong week one. He may finally be reaching his potential, but even so that potential is no match for what Fitz should certainly do this year. Ravens vs. Jags - Ravens should be a top D, Jags not a bad option but not at the Ravens level. IMO, the Brown/Fitz/Ravens/Braanch side is giving up way too much and receiving way too little to warrant a deal. +1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonw15 Posted September 13, 2007 Author Share Posted September 13, 2007 alright, thanks guys, the only reason I was contemplating doing it, is I haven the packers defence on reserve that I could start, and I am scared with Ronnie sharing so many carries with Chatman. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonw15 Posted September 13, 2007 Author Share Posted September 13, 2007 (edited) What if I was able to take the defenses off the table, Ronnie, Branch, and Fitz for Rudi, Coles, and Curry? Is anyone of the opinion that Ronnie Brown will actually do something this year? Edited September 13, 2007 by jonw15 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.