Furd Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 I answered Puddy. Because I knows what perjury is, and there is no way to determine that right now. Substitute "lie" for perjure, and chalk up another yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cunning Runt Posted February 8, 2008 Author Share Posted February 8, 2008 I answered Puddy. Because I knows what perjury is, and there is no way to determine that right now. Substitute "lie" for perjure, and chalk up another yes. "The deliberate, willful giving of false, misleading, or incomplete testimony under oath". What am I missing here? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whomper Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 Without a doubt. So what'd you vote? I voted yes but think a conviction isnt still guarenteed no matter how guilty he may be Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
isleseeya Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 I voted yes but think a conviction isnt still guarenteed no matter how guilty he may be i think he may see some time imho ...either way he will be ruined and all those cy youngs of his will look like stuff you find in a junk yard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Furd Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 "The deliberate, willful giving of false, misleading, or incomplete testimony under oath". What am I missing here? His testimony? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cunning Runt Posted February 8, 2008 Author Share Posted February 8, 2008 (edited) His testimony? I thought he had a couple days ago to a congressional hearing. No? Edit to add: He did give 5hrs of sworn testimony Tuesday. Per a Yahoo News Story.... The seven-time Cy Young Award winner as a top league pitcher provided five hours of testimony under oath Tuesday to US House of Representatives Oversight Committee attorneys but has followed up with extraordinary personal visits Clemens has denied the accusations and the matter will come to a dramatic showdown next Wednesday at a committee hearing where Clemens and McNamee will testify under oath following their sworn depositions earlier this week. Should both stick to their differing accounts, one of them would be liable for perjury charges for lying to Congress. Edited February 8, 2008 by Cunning Runt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.