The Mucca Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 So sayeth the climatologists, it's about time. LINK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evil_gop_liars Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 Yeah we win. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perchoutofwater Posted February 2, 2010 Share Posted February 2, 2010 How can anyone still belive a word the "scientific community" says on this issue? It has become a religion for the weak minded and a cash cow for the scientist and would have become a cash cow for the governments had they just been able to hold their lies together a little bit longer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushwacked Posted February 2, 2010 Share Posted February 2, 2010 to affect or alter by indirect or intangible means capable of being altered or controlled by outside forces or influence to be controlled or played upon by artful, unfair, or insidious means especially to one's own advantage Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmarc117 Posted February 2, 2010 Share Posted February 2, 2010 to affect or alter by indirect or intangible means capable of being altered or controlled by outside forces or influence to be controlled or played upon by artful, unfair, or insidious means especially to one's own advantage you finally get it........ http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010...e-jones-chinese Phil Jones, the beleaguered British climate scientist at the centre of the leaked emails controversy, is facing fresh claims that he sought to hide problems in key temperature data on which some of his work was based. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.