wiegie Posted March 4, 2011 Share Posted March 4, 2011 Northwestern to investigate sex toy demonstrationBy DON BABWIN, Associated Press Thursday, March 3, 2011 12:53 PST Chicago, IL (AP) -- Northwestern University's president said Thursday that he is "troubled and disappointed" that a psychology professor allowed a couple to engage in a sex act involving a motorized sex toy in front of dozens of students, and he is calling for an investigation. Hours after accounts of the Feb. 21 class appeared in local newspapers — including the university's defense of Professor John Michael Bailey's decision to allow students to witness the act — Northwestern President Morton Schapiro strongly criticized the lecturer. "I feel it represented extremely poor judgment on the part of our faculty member," Schapiro said a statement issued by the Evanston university. A guest lecturer had been discussing bondage and sexual fetishes during Bailey's human sexuality class. According to published reports, a couple at the lecture decided that a video the students were watching on the female orgasm was not realistic and gave a live presentation involving the sex toy. Schapiro said it did not matter that the incident occurred after the class was over, that attendance was voluntarily and that the students were warned of the explicit nature of what they were about to see. "I have recently learned of the after-class activity associated with Prof. Michael Bailey's Human Sexuality class, and I am troubled and disappointed by what occurred," he said. "I simply do not believe this was appropriate, necessary or in keeping with Northwestern University's academic mission," he said. Evanston police say it will be up to the school to determine if the demonstration violated any local ordinances. The guest lecturer asked the students if they were "ready for a live sex show," student Justin Smith told the Chicago Tribune. At that point, Faith Kroll took off her clothes and she and Jim Marcus climbed on the stage and, as about 100 students looked on, the pair demonstrated the use of a motorized device with a phallic object attached to it. The lecturer, Ken Melvoin-Berg, told the newspaper that the students were told about issues such as safety and consent. "It is probably something I will remember the rest of my life," Smith, a 21-year-old senior, told the Tribune. "I can't say that about my Econ 202 class and the material that I learned there." The university will pay several hundred dollars to Melvoin-Berg, the co-owner of Weird Chicago Tours, for the lecture. He said neither Kroll nor Marcus — exhibitionists who are more than happy to have people watch them have sex — would be paid. Kroll said she enjoyed the demonstration and Marcus said it was all designed to teach, not titillate. "I certainly have no regrets concerning Northwestern students, who have demonstrated that they are open-minded grown-ups rather than fragile children," Bailey told the Tribune. Bailey did not answer calls to his office Thursday. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursa Majoris Posted March 4, 2011 Share Posted March 4, 2011 You need to consider the use of more, um, aids to learning. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chester Posted March 4, 2011 Share Posted March 4, 2011 Spank bank 101 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chester Posted March 4, 2011 Share Posted March 4, 2011 I guess it's a good thing they didn't do a Phineas Gage demonstration. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matt770 Posted March 4, 2011 Share Posted March 4, 2011 Women have orgasms? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bpwallace49 Posted March 4, 2011 Share Posted March 4, 2011 Man . .. Maybe I will add Northwestern to my list of schools for MBA classes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Beatings Posted March 4, 2011 Share Posted March 4, 2011 I find this sentence to be curious. Evanston police say it will be up to the school to determine if the demonstration violated any local ordinances. Why would it be up to the school and not the police to determine this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bpwallace49 Posted March 4, 2011 Share Posted March 4, 2011 I find this sentence to be curious. Why would it be up to the school and not the police to determine this? Good point. Maybe so University Police would handle it first? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.