moneymakers Posted March 31, 2011 Share Posted March 31, 2011 Hope and Change (little sheep voted for clueless man) Noble Peace Prize winner (given to clueless man by clueless sheep) Guy has more wars going than any other President. (just ask Mr.Trump) Guy has spent more than all other Presidents combined. (just ask Tom Spelnver) Fill in the blank It XXXX be long now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbpfan1231 Posted March 31, 2011 Share Posted March 31, 2011 Have to agree with most of the lefties on this one. Seems like the USA went in and bomed what they could and stopped because short of sendning in ground troops there was nothing more to bomb. I would much rather he did that and send in some covert ops and get the job done compared to what we are doing in Iraq and Afghanistan. Now the only thing is to make it happen - hopefully he will succeed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Square Posted March 31, 2011 Share Posted March 31, 2011 What is Newt's solution today so I can tell what the wrong answer is? Rand Paul: I was happy to see that Newt Gingrich has staked out a position on the war, a position, or two, or maybe three. I don’t know. I think he has more war positions than he’s had wives. Kinda harsh but I chuckled. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursa Majoris Posted March 31, 2011 Share Posted March 31, 2011 Rand Paul: I was happy to see that Newt Gingrich has staked out a position on the war, a position, or two, or maybe three. I don’t know. I think he has more war positions than he’s had wives. Kinda harsh but I chuckled. I actually like Paul, regardless of some of his politics. At least he has a coherent plan and is willing to back it up. Gingrich, OTOH, is a tired corrupt old fart who says what he thinks will serve him best......in other words, just another meh politician. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushwacked Posted March 31, 2011 Share Posted March 31, 2011 Acutally Obama is using Libya as an excuse to deplete the military and implement his private army. Who elects these radical wingnuts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursa Majoris Posted March 31, 2011 Share Posted March 31, 2011 Acutally Obama is using Libya as an excuse to deplete the military and implement his private army. Who elects these radical wingnuts? The whole GOP is going nuts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yukon Cornelius Posted March 31, 2011 Share Posted March 31, 2011 What is Newt's solution today so I can tell what the wrong answer is? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azazello1313 Posted March 31, 2011 Share Posted March 31, 2011 Newt Palin and Bachmann. Rand Paul I see you guys got the talking points memo this morning Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clubfoothead Posted March 31, 2011 Share Posted March 31, 2011 Which week's opinion of teh solution do you want. The weeks where he calls for action or the weeks where he bashed Obama for taking action? The president is right, it is a turd sandwich. We know one side is lead a murderous scumbag who paid someone to blow up a high school buddy of mine. We know the other side doesn't like that guys side. I think time will tell that the relative hands-off approach we took in Egypt was the right move. Apparently, the violenece in Lybia will not afford us that option. See Karzi and Al-Yawar Only 47% favor action because we aren't sure the guys we want to side with are worth of our siding with. It is a legitimate concern. Iraq and Afghanistan should have at least taught us to not be in a rush to determine who our friends are and that none of the candiates are going to look particularly good. Apparently, given the precedent set by the last administration, the alternative to lmitied engagement is invasion, occupation, liberation and a decade plus of rebuilding on the back of teh American taxpayer. In that regard, a slow, calculated approach seems reasonable. If limited air strikes and CIA operatives can effect a change in Lybia that benefits the United States, then isn't that preferrable to Operation Lybian Freedom? I think the only answer to that question is yes. There's my statment. Argue away. I see you guys got the talking points memo this morning It's common sense, not talking points. But enjoy whatever floats yer boat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yukon Cornelius Posted April 1, 2011 Share Posted April 1, 2011 I see you guys got the talking points memo this morning hey that's my line Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tazinib1 Posted April 1, 2011 Share Posted April 1, 2011 I find it HIGHLY unlikely that we do not know who we are supporting in Lybia. We have a nice little budget that goes to the CIA for this very purpose. At any rate, we just opened the door for our European allies to proceed. Cause as I've stated before, the majority of oil interest there is European. You do the math. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursa Majoris Posted April 1, 2011 Share Posted April 1, 2011 I find it HIGHLY unlikely that we do not know who we are supporting in Lybia. <snip> You do the math. In 1980, the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan and we supported the Mujahideen, because it would be HIGHLY unlikely that we didn't know who they were. You do the history. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tazinib1 Posted April 1, 2011 Share Posted April 1, 2011 In 1980, the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan and we supported the Mujahideen, because it would be HIGHLY unlikely that we didn't know who they were. You do the history. Bush was in charge then wasn't he? Fail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moneymakers Posted April 1, 2011 Share Posted April 1, 2011 Bush was in charge then wasn't he? Fail. come on Jimmy you can do better than that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tazinib1 Posted April 1, 2011 Share Posted April 1, 2011 come on Jimmy you can do better than that. In charge of CIA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.