puz Posted October 9, 2011 Share Posted October 9, 2011 (edited) i dont have the denver game at home, so was wondering whats going on with decker. Has he even had any targets?.. Edited October 9, 2011 by puz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunday Couch Potatoe Posted October 9, 2011 Share Posted October 9, 2011 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lennykravitz2004 Posted October 9, 2011 Share Posted October 9, 2011 Here's a link to the ESPN game center site, where receptions, yards, avg, and targets are all tracked. Hope this helps! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pseudolefty Posted October 9, 2011 Share Posted October 9, 2011 Orton was out-of-sync. They pulled him to appease the fans and Tebow is even worse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tosberg34 Posted October 9, 2011 Share Posted October 9, 2011 (edited) 62 TOTAL yards passing between the two (Orton and Tebow). Unbelievable. Decker and Mike Williams are killing me because because all of the QBs SUCK bones between the two teams. ugh. Edited October 9, 2011 by tosberg34 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexgaddis Posted October 9, 2011 Share Posted October 9, 2011 62 TOTAL yards passing between the two (Orton and Tebow). Unbelievable. Decker and Mike Williams are killing me because because all of the QBs SUCK bones between the two teams. ugh. + Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kpholmes Posted October 10, 2011 Share Posted October 10, 2011 FWIW Decker dropped Tebow's second pass - which would have been about 40 yards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nelsosi Posted October 10, 2011 Share Posted October 10, 2011 Deckers fantasy value just went to near-zero with Tebow apparently taking over starter duties. I'd be looking to unload him for anything you can get. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nelsosi Posted October 10, 2011 Share Posted October 10, 2011 No I'm saying that Tebows skill set doesn't lend itself well to a posession / redzone WR being a productive fantasy asset. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nelsosi Posted October 10, 2011 Share Posted October 10, 2011 You're exactly who I'd be trying to trade Decker to right now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
damageinc Posted October 10, 2011 Share Posted October 10, 2011 I had Decker and traded him last week with the thought that Tebow could start. Decker a possesion WR will be worth squat under Tebow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nelsosi Posted October 10, 2011 Share Posted October 10, 2011 I was trying to help you, but ok. I'm guessing that you've never seen Decker play? I've seen him play plenty. He'll have no fantasy value with Tebow in anything but a really deep league. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lennykravitz2004 Posted October 10, 2011 Share Posted October 10, 2011 I've seen him play plenty. He'll have no fantasy value with Tebow in anything but a really deep league. I haven't seen him play plenty, and yet, I've come to the same conclusion. Personally, I just don't get the renob over Tebow. 2 catches for -4 yards. MINUS FOUR YARDS RECEIVING!!! (Knocking on wood as I say this...) At least I have Austin and Marshall coming back with Nate Wash in the wings. Decker's probably going to the WW this week, definitely next if two weeks in a row play out like today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
detlef Posted October 10, 2011 Share Posted October 10, 2011 I'm not ditching him in the league I have him in and will snap him up if he's ditched in any others. Dude seems like the kind of player who Tebow will look for. I mean, if you need him to be anything more than a pleasant surprise when he gives you good points, then you've got bigger issues on your roster than him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nelsosi Posted October 10, 2011 Share Posted October 10, 2011 I mean, if you need him to be anything more than a pleasant surprise when he gives you good points, then you've got bigger issues on your roster than him. if you're starting guys that you're not expecting much from then you're already in trouble Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted October 10, 2011 Share Posted October 10, 2011 if you're starting guys that you're not expecting much from then you're already in trouble not everyone plays in 8 team leagues where you can plug in a stud on a bye week and feel confident... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
detlef Posted October 10, 2011 Share Posted October 10, 2011 if you're starting guys that you're not expecting much from then you're already in trouble The league I have Decker in, we start 2 RBs, 3WRs, and 2 Flex. Because it's only a 10 team league, that means we're 70 deep in terms of WR/RB who are starting any given week. That doesn't include bye weeks and the like. Eric Decker has certainly been, and likely will continue to be among the 70 best players in terms of those positions. So, yes, I start him. But like some of the other guys who you may be forced to start when you're that deep into the FF depth charts, he's not the guy you're resting your hopes on. There's not a team in my league who doesn't start at least 1 WR/RB who, like Eric Decker, you're stoked if you get something but aren't expecting much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LB49ers Posted October 10, 2011 Share Posted October 10, 2011 think i will have to take chance with Cruz over Decker now, this guy is boom or bust, he doesn't even catch for alot of yds just TD's Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanTheMan_5 Posted October 10, 2011 Share Posted October 10, 2011 The league I have Decker in, we start 2 RBs, 3WRs, and 2 Flex. Because it's only a 10 team league, that means we're 70 deep in terms of WR/RB who are starting any given week. That doesn't include bye weeks and the like. Eric Decker has certainly been, and likely will continue to be among the 70 best players in terms of those positions. So, yes, I start him. But like some of the other guys who you may be forced to start when you're that deep into the FF depth charts, he's not the guy you're resting your hopes on. There's not a team in my league who doesn't start at least 1 WR/RB who, like Eric Decker, you're stoked if you get something but aren't expecting much. To be clear, you start 2RB 3WR 2FLEX Do you start a TE or is that considered part of the flex? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
detlef Posted October 10, 2011 Share Posted October 10, 2011 To be clear, you start 2RB 3WR 2FLEX Do you start a TE or is that considered part of the flex? We start a TE as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lennykravitz2004 Posted October 10, 2011 Share Posted October 10, 2011 Decker's probably going to the WW this week, definitely next if two weeks in a row play out like today. Decker's on bye next week and he's kinda guaranteed to put up another goose egg... "overreact much". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.