Wally Posted September 4, 2005 Share Posted September 4, 2005 I know the ass hats at sportsline aren't the most reliable group in the world, but they've got Moe Williams listed as the #2 and Bennett's injured. So is Moore, Williams, or Fason going to be the starter in Week 1? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Posted September 4, 2005 Share Posted September 4, 2005 Mike Tice is playing with your mind. These guys are even worse than Denver. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainHook Posted September 4, 2005 Share Posted September 4, 2005 If you drafted a Minny RB, you'll be playing this game ever week. I did it last year, and will never do it again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Beatings Posted September 4, 2005 Share Posted September 4, 2005 Here's how it breaks down... Bennett will be the starter in week 1. Yes, he has been injured, but they have been keeping him off the field in order to let him heal. For whatever reason, Bennett is Tice's favored RB and unless he just absolutely cannot go, he will be the featured back in Minnesota (until he consistenly shows himself to be completely ineffective this year). Moe is going the be the 3rd down back. That's why they have him listed as #2 on the depth chart. He will probably be the main goal line RB as well. Even though Moe is listed as the #2 back, Moore will be the RB that starts if Bennett cannot go (due to either injury or total lack of production). So, Moore will initially be on the bench a lot. He'll get in on one or two series each game, but that will be it unless they name him the starter. Whether Bennett or Moore is the starter, Moe's role will remain the same. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorcher Posted September 4, 2005 Share Posted September 4, 2005 I really like Moore, but I learned the hard way last year that the only time you can be sure about who the Vike starter is, is after the game is over: and even then you sometimes can't tell who the starting rb was! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wally Posted September 4, 2005 Author Share Posted September 4, 2005 Thanks for the info guys. I picked up Moe in the late rounds and was hoping he produce the first couple of weeks so that I could pawn him off on someone else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delicious_bass Posted September 4, 2005 Share Posted September 4, 2005 I really like Moore, but I learned the hard way last year that the only time you can be sure about who the Vike starter is, is after the game is over: and even then you sometimes can't tell who the starting rb was! 965858[/snapback] Sad but true, Scorcher. Sad but true. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.