TripleW64 Posted October 4, 2005 Share Posted October 4, 2005 Is it possible that the new Colts offense calls for Stokely to be the decoy? Surely there must be some mystical game plan in place that explains why he only has 10 receptions. Maybe it's a long term plan to lull the defenses into forgetting about him for the first 8 games then Stokely reels off 100 gazillion TDs. Or maybe they just want my Fantasy team to SUCK! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted October 4, 2005 Share Posted October 4, 2005 Is it possible that the new Colts offense calls for Stokely to be the decoy? Surely there must be some mystical game plan in place that explains why he only has 10 receptions. Maybe it's a long term plan to lull the defenses into forgetting about him for the first 8 games then Stokely reels off 100 gazillion TDs. Or maybe they just want my Fantasy team to SUCK! 1042382[/snapback] Stikley spent alot of the time on the sidelines because they ran double TE formations alot to hold off the blitz... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bok_choy Posted October 4, 2005 Share Posted October 4, 2005 Lest not forget he is the #3 WR.... not to mention the 4th or 5th option. true he had a FANTASTIC year last year but you couldnt really expect the same....could you? I am sure he'll have the occasional "great" game but expecting anything like last years production would be a BIG assumption in my opinion... also, the success the Colts had with the scheme on Sunday does not bode well for Stokely.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gilthorp Posted October 4, 2005 Share Posted October 4, 2005 Somebody complaining about their team sucking and using Stokely as a reason must have bigger issues than just that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrTed46 Posted October 4, 2005 Share Posted October 4, 2005 If Stokley gets those points every week for me Ill concider myself lucky....hes not A Gonzo or Gates and never will be/can. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexgaddis Posted October 4, 2005 Share Posted October 4, 2005 They also used to have a Tight End named Clark... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TripleW64 Posted October 4, 2005 Author Share Posted October 4, 2005 Somebody complaining about their team sucking and using Stokely as a reason must have bigger issues than just that. 1042482[/snapback] True. My WR corps has me in a hole. Holt has done very well, Burleson, who I was counting on as my #2, has been out and wasn't a factor when he played. that left me with using Stokely or B. Edwards as my #2. Neither has produced anything of consequence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gilthorp Posted October 4, 2005 Share Posted October 4, 2005 Well, you're getting good info. here. Stokely wasn't playing much due to the plan, and that may not change much due to their success. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrTed46 Posted October 4, 2005 Share Posted October 4, 2005 WOW I must be tired at work. Ignore my above post I thought you were talking about Clark. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.