Blue Corn Flautas Posted October 20, 2005 Share Posted October 20, 2005 My team basically consists of LT, McNabb and alot of nothing. (my team is listed at the bottom) Im 2-3-1 but Im eeking out wins when those 2 play great....and I just stink when they have an off day. I feel like too much reliance on 2 guys. I floated in my league that I would trade LT. So in general, after looking at my roster, should I be looking to get 2 RB's in return, or some type of RB-WR combo. I know its hard to answer. Id say I got 2 decent offers 1 Lamont Jordan and Deion Branch 2 Portis, Cadillac, and Houshmendozah Any thoughts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zooty Posted October 20, 2005 Share Posted October 20, 2005 Ouch, rough at WR. Maybe #2 if you can get Pittman also or another WR who is better than what you have. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Footballjoe Posted October 20, 2005 Share Posted October 20, 2005 I don't know what you should do but I am interested in getting LT from someone in my league who has the same situation. He has Bulger (now injured) & LT. They are the only ones really giving him points. I will be going at him hard to get LT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoTs Posted October 20, 2005 Share Posted October 20, 2005 Look to get decent RB/WR combo, look to get no 1 receiver, and top RB. Might check out the owner who has Steve Smith, Smith probably went as his second WR, #2 wouldn't be too bad, not sure anyone knows how bad Housh's hand really is, you might be taking on dead weight at a position you need to upgrade. On the other hand you might just try patching WR corp together, rather than trading LT, move andersen or davis for better no 2 wr. Only move LT if you are getting better than you are giving up, LT is worth Lamont Jordan and Holt or someone No 1, if you don't get that then keep what you have. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yo mama Posted October 20, 2005 Share Posted October 20, 2005 Honestly, depending on what you can negotitate, you might be better off trading McNabb, keeping LT2, and relying on Brunell going forward. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Corn Flautas Posted October 20, 2005 Author Share Posted October 20, 2005 thanks everyone Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kicker22 Posted October 20, 2005 Share Posted October 20, 2005 Honestly, depending on what you can negotitate, you might be better off trading McNabb, keeping LT2, and relying on Brunell going forward. 1084447[/snapback] This is exactly what I am trying to do as I also have LT and McNabb and Brunell. Check out my post Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yo mama Posted October 20, 2005 Share Posted October 20, 2005 This is exactly what I am trying to do as I also have LT and McNabb and Brunell. Check out my post 1084821[/snapback] Sorry, I don't reply to kicker posts. Just teasin' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.