Insrtead of multiple post's

[fantasyfanatic]

I am usually good for a who do I start here and there. However this week seems a little tough. So here goes it:

 

1.) WR2 - S.Smith as #1 is a no brainer. Leaning on starting Engram here. I like McCardell also but for some ungodly reason every week I start him I lose.(others D.Jax, Northcutt or Curtis)

 

2.) W/R (Flex) - I am a firm believer that a RB should always be starting here. So of the 4 which one should ride the Pine? (Martin, S.Jackson, M.Anderson or DD)

 

3.) I hardly ever ask a team d question. But I have Minny @ home against St.Louis or the NYG in Philly. Is there a bad play here?

 

*** Edited for clearity. ***

Edited December 8, 2005 by fantasyfanatic

[fantasyfanatic]

 

anyone???

[Gdawg]

No offense, but I think you need to simplify your questions..IE "should I start player A or player B". Break it down that way and I'll be happy to give you my opinion, for what its worth

 

As for your Ds, no you really cant go wrong with either one! Philly is a train wreck and STL ALWAYS gives up a ton of sacks, INTs, and fumbles.

[craiginthecapital]

1) Engram. Favorite receiver of Hass and managed to get a TD even with Alex around.

 

2) SJax. Rams have said they're going to get back to relying on him more and the Vikes D will be more obsessed with trying to stop the Rams WRs. Anderson's my #2 here, but Shanahan has already made it clear that he's going to start cutting back even more on Mike's carries through the end of the regular season.

 

3) Giants. Who in the He!l is going to be able to score from the Eagles? When given the choice of playing two decent Ds, I take the one playing against a team full of secondaries.

[nhoops]

Thanks for the reply. FYI - matchups will help as well as lineups in post (once we hit reply we can see your sig without hitting back)

 

Now the Ques.

 

1.) Engram - I see a nice game

2. ) tough one, probably Jackson until QB issues are straightened out, just barely over Martin.

3.) GMEN, no doubt!!

 

Good Luck

[fantasyfanatic]

No offense, but I think you need to simplify your questions..IE "should I start player A or player B". Break it down that way and I'll be happy to give you my opinion, for what its worth 

 

As for your Ds, no you really cant go wrong with either  one! Philly is a train wreck and STL ALWAYS gives up a ton of sacks, INTs, and fumbles.

 

1200911[/snapback]

 

 

 

 

 

Better?

[Gdawg]

I am usually good for a who do I start here and there. However this week seems a little tough. So here goes it:

 

1.) WR2 - S.Smith as #1 is a no brainer. Leaning on starting Engram here. I like McCardell also but for some ungodly reason every week I start him I lose.(others D.Jax, Northcutt or Curtis)

 

2.) W/R (Flex) - I am a firm believer that a RB should always be starting here. So of the 4 which one should ride the Pine? (Martin, S.Jackson, M.Anderson or DD)

 

3.) I hardly ever ask a team d question. But I have Minny @ home against St.Louis or the NYG in Philly. Is there a bad play here?

 

*** Edited for clearity. ***

 

1200829[/snapback]

 

 

 

 

Sorry, I was a little cranky this morning

 

1) Engram, not even sure if Djax plays this week, its not like SEA will even need him so I'm thinking he doesnt. NOT a fan of Northcutt or Curtis.

 

2) I'd leave SJax on the bench. The Rams cannot move the ball with Fitz under center. im sorry, I know everybody is rooting for this kid but I cant see him getting the job done...bads news for SJax, even if they say there going to run more.

 

3) As I said earlier, both are strong plays. Probably would go with the Gmen, but just by a hair.

 

Good luck, hope this helps!

Edited December 8, 2005 by Gdawg