Danny Zuko Posted May 20, 2007 Share Posted May 20, 2007 With so many guys to choose from if the opportunity arrises do you go for it - provided a Lynch, Jacobs, or Green is the third? It seems like there are few clear cut WRs to chose from (if any) and solid QBs seem to pop up all the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Country Posted May 20, 2007 Share Posted May 20, 2007 Depends on league rules. If your league allows you to start 3 RBs and a solid RB option that is better than your WR/QB/TE options is there, then do it. If you can't start 3 RBs, or there are better options at other positions, then you should probably pass on the strategy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pope Flick Posted May 20, 2007 Share Posted May 20, 2007 I think this is shaping into a good year to go 3 RBs in your first 4 picks, while taking the time to spend a 2nd or 3rd on your top WR. Solid WRs look deep this year: SSmith, Harrison, Wayne, CJ, Owens, Holt, Fitz, Boldin, RoyW - that's 9 right there so one is sure to drop into the 3rd round, but none would make the 4th. But if you think Javon Walker might, for instance and can live with him as your #1 (and some people happily will) then go for 3 straight in your first 3 picks. DeAngelo Williams and Ladell Betts are guys that might slip past the 5th in locals, but probably not BoTH leagues. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.