CardinalEmpire.com Posted September 18, 2007 Share Posted September 18, 2007 OK, I talked to the other owner to see if he was interested in trading. He's at least listening, so here is the offer I am whipping up: I Give: Adrian Peterson & Anquan Boldin I Get: Terrell Owens & Thomas Jones You can see my roster in my sig and the reasons I'm not too concerned letting AD go. I think this is a big upgrade for me to possibly compete for the title. Before I submit the offer, though, I wanted to get feedback. Am I making too much of getting a stud WR? Am I giving up too much? Does Boldin have any shot of getting back on track in this new offense (only 15 looks through two weeks). Should I offer Calvin Johnson instead of Boldin? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lawn saver Posted September 18, 2007 Share Posted September 18, 2007 I like this trade... I think it gives you a much strong #1 WR and you still have a solid RB base with FWP and Rudi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CardinalEmpire.com Posted September 19, 2007 Author Share Posted September 19, 2007 bump Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ljbrun Posted September 19, 2007 Share Posted September 19, 2007 This looks like a good deal for you. You'll still have 4 good RB's (I think TJ will be better than his slow start might indicate) to choose from to start 1/2 and your choices for starting 2/3 WR's definitely improves. I'm assuming this isn't a keeper league. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
splotchman Posted September 19, 2007 Share Posted September 19, 2007 (edited) As long as it is not a keeper league as noted above, pull the trigger. Edited September 19, 2007 by splotchman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feartheturtle Posted September 19, 2007 Share Posted September 19, 2007 Since you have to start 2 WR, I would definitely make the trade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CardinalEmpire.com Posted September 19, 2007 Author Share Posted September 19, 2007 OK, the owner is modifying his request. He didn't like Peterson as the RB and is asking for Rudi Johnson instead. I'm not sure if this is a good thing or a bad one. I like Peterson's upside and am worried that Rudi will get lost in Cincinnati this season if the defense continues to be as bad as it looked Sunday. I'd still have Thomas Jones coming to me in that scenario and my RB2 would instead be TJones/AD/Lamont Jordan. Still a good trade? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G.K.Trey Posted September 19, 2007 Share Posted September 19, 2007 I like this trade... I think it gives you a much strong #1 WR and you still have a solid RB base with FWP and Rudi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CardinalEmpire.com Posted September 19, 2007 Author Share Posted September 19, 2007 Do we still like the trade if Peterson is replaced in the deal by Rudi Johnson? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G.K.Trey Posted September 19, 2007 Share Posted September 19, 2007 Do we still like the trade if Peterson is replaced in the deal by Rudi Johnson? NO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.