Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

question on the bailout


polksalet
 Share

Recommended Posts

Since the federal gummet has effectively bought all of the these mortgages doesn't that make these properties owned by the federal gumment? If so, does how does that affect the principle of adverse possession. Sine one cannot adversely possess against the government does this do away with adverse possession involving these properties?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To an extent, its a state law issue. In some states the bank owns the property until the mortgage is paid off. In other states the homeowner owns the land and the bank merely has a lien against it. Of course, that assumes that the government is even buying mortgages to begin with. In addition, a lot of the subprime mortgages were packaged together like mutual funds and interests in the funds are what was bought and sold. So the ability of the federal government to forclose on the mortgages would depend on the nature of the assets that they've purchases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information