chinatown dragons Posted October 16, 2009 Share Posted October 16, 2009 ten team league....1 pt every 10 yards receivng....no PPC.....6 for a td...... Swinging for the fences with the high risk/high reward start of Santana Moss vs Chiefs (all speedy WR's have done well against them).... Also got 3 RB's penciled in (Grant vs Detroit), Benson vs Houston, PT vs Giants). Need one of the above to round out.....or, can possibly bench PT (if looks like sharing carries) and put TWO in.... Thoughts??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearBroncos Posted October 16, 2009 Share Posted October 16, 2009 At this point, Denver is considered the best defense against the TE, allowing the least amount of points to a TE. Colston will be in a plethora of receivers while DJax will want to get his shot after the rookie stole the show last week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chinatown dragons Posted October 16, 2009 Author Share Posted October 16, 2009 At this point, Denver is considered the best defense against the TE, allowing the least amount of points to a TE. Colston will be in a plethora of receivers while DJax will want to get his shot after the rookie stole the show last week. Thanks BearBroncos....was leanign that way....but got nervous that the DB for Oakland (who's name won't pronounce), will be all over DeSean, and it's the Maclin show again...hoping not....as guess McNabb and DeSean had a talk.... think it's wise to leave PT in over Gates and Colston? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nhoops Posted October 16, 2009 Share Posted October 16, 2009 Really tough call....when in doubt, go with the #1 or the better offense......so that doesn't really help much. Slight edge to Colston over D.Jackson. I think you'll get something with him. But Jackson has the chance of putting up a monster game, albeit against a tough defender. Good Luck, check out mine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearBroncos Posted October 16, 2009 Share Posted October 16, 2009 That one, I'm having difficulty with myself, being a PT owner. They are listing PT as tendering a hamstring injury and Bell as good to go, but PT is the primary back. NYG will have to defend either the pass or the run so either Brees will have a big day or the running game will explode. Now, who will get the nod for the running game, that's another story. I honestly think that Peyton is just not tipping his hand and PT is in better shape than reported so that NY won't know who to defend against but it's a gamble. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Montana is da Man Posted October 16, 2009 Share Posted October 16, 2009 Think you need to start Colson. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chinatown dragons Posted October 16, 2009 Author Share Posted October 16, 2009 thanks...seems like Colston is the starter..... if i read that PT's injury is lingering, or he may share carries, can always yank him out and put in DJ or Gates.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davetoronto Posted October 16, 2009 Share Posted October 16, 2009 yeah go with Colston, Oaklands pass defence is too good... Philly is going to running the ball all game!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chubbyparrot Posted October 16, 2009 Share Posted October 16, 2009 I would say Colston for some of the reasons metioned above, but you also have to consider the Radiers are so putrid that Djax may not even play more than a half...last week the Giants #1 Smith didn't score against Oakland, it was Nicks, the #2... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikingsfan11 Posted October 17, 2009 Share Posted October 17, 2009 i would start djax....Colston has done nothing all year, i dont expect him to start against the number 1 defense through 5 weeks, even if he is coming off a bye and at home. I like Djax...Nnamdi Asomugha will be used all over the field stopping BOTH wr's so each should have a fair outing. Though honestly i would bench pierre, someone up there said maybe peyton was bs'ing and its not as bad as they are letting on to try and get the giants to prepare incorrectly, however i think its the opposite, i think they want the giants to think that both will be playing when really it is just going to be Bell. please check out my football blog, http://imaginarygridiron.blogspot.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.