kwboie Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 12 team 2RB 1Flex 2WR Foster, Bowe FOR Wayne My roster: RB: C. Johnson, Greene, Charles, Bradshaw, Foster WR: White, Smith NYG, Bowe, Berrian, Aromashodu, Naanee He has RB: S. Jackson, Cadillac, that's it WR: Wayne, Jennings, Breaston, Floyd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt. Stanky Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 I wouldn't do that trade. Foster is your 2nd best back. I would roll with what you got switching out SSmith and Bowe depending on matchups. You should be starting CJ, Foster and Charles every week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearBroncos Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 I think you have a solid RB core and I also think Foster will lose value and quickly. People are extremely high on Foster so you can get good value for him this week. If he comes out on Sunday and does 50 yards and no TD's because they decide to unleash Schuab, Foster's value falls steady. I say take the trade and shore up your receiving core. Greene will be a points getter, especially in the second half of the season. CJ, well, he's CJ and Charles is now being called pocket CJ because he runs as special as Mr. Johnson. Again, note this that Foster's value will decrease! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kwboie Posted September 17, 2010 Author Share Posted September 17, 2010 I wouldn't do that trade. Foster is your 2nd best back. I would roll with what you got switching out SSmith and Bowe depending on matchups. You should be starting CJ, Foster and Charles every week. Bradshaw's schedule is pie and greene had his worst game I hate Smith and Bowe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kwboie Posted September 17, 2010 Author Share Posted September 17, 2010 Should I try: Bradshaw, Smith FOR Wayne Charles, Bowe FOR Wayne Bradshaw, Bowe FOR Jennings ???????? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt. Stanky Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 I think you have a solid RB core and I also think Foster will lose value and quickly. People are extremely high on Foster so you can get good value for him this week. If he comes out on Sunday and does 50 yards and no TD's because they decide to unleash Schuab, Foster's value falls steady. I say take the trade and shore up your receiving core. Greene will be a points getter, especially in the second half of the season. CJ, well, he's CJ and Charles is now being called pocket CJ because he runs as special as Mr. Johnson. Again, note this that Foster's value will decrease! If anything, the fact that Foster has no competition for touches is what makes him more valuable than all your other backs, besides CJ. You could roll the dice, but if it were me I would try to move Charles or Greene. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum_GLI Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 If you do decide to part with Foster, now might be the time, I personally think the hype for him is too much. The Bradshaw and Bowe for Jennings would be ok, if you can get Wayne for Bradshaw and Bowe I would go ahead and do it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ABearWithFurniture Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 If you do decide to part with Foster, now might be the time, I personally think the hype for him is too much. Thank god there were 11 other guys in my draft just like you... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kwboie Posted September 17, 2010 Author Share Posted September 17, 2010 Why? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ABearWithFurniture Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 Why? Because they let Foster fall to me in draft after draft after draft... And you have a good team...no way in hell I'd make that trade. Just sit tight and enjoy the ride! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearBroncos Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 If anything, the fact that Foster has no competition for touches is what makes him more valuable than all your other backs, besides CJ. You could roll the dice, but if it were me I would try to move Charles or Greene. Remember, just not to long ago, Slaton was the main man in Houston and was slated (wow, there's a pun) for stardum. Slaton still resides on their roster and is still a good back. His major conundrum was his drops. If Foster starts to slow down (which he sill) and Slaton holds onto the ball, you absolutely could see a RBBC in a pass heavey team. At that point, you could easily see Foster go from a 1200+ yard - 10+ TD back to a 800+ yard 6+ td back and basically a NWE still backfield. Kubiak is NOT a run first style coach. He was a prodigy of Shanahan and was the QB caoch for the Broncos for years and was a hell of a back up QB himself for years. He likes to air the ball out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toolman Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 Of course his value will go down It will be hard to top what he did last weekend. But to trade him away is crazy!!! Why do you need to make any trades your roster is solid IMO Foster shares his carries with Slaton the split went 33 for Foster 6 for Slaton that's number 1 running back numbers. ANY Rb you can get that doesn't split carries and looks like he's going to get 20-30+ carries a game you DON'T trade away unless your deficient in another position and I don't think you are. Good luck!! Please answer mine Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xdikkx Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 If I were you, I'd be beyond stoked with my team without any trading. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.