polksalet Posted July 29, 2011 Share Posted July 29, 2011 http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow-gapin...-192334971.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clubfoothead Posted July 29, 2011 Share Posted July 29, 2011 In celebration, I have my car in the driveway idling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ditkaless Wonders Posted July 29, 2011 Share Posted July 29, 2011 (edited) Author, author! Edited July 29, 2011 by Ditkaless Wonders Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Sacrebleu Posted July 29, 2011 Share Posted July 29, 2011 Is this the equivalent of the autopen for articles? The word alarmist is used 15 times. Though it says that the NASA recordings are "far" lower than the "alarmist computer models" it really doesn't tell us to what degree and what it means re: global warming. Totally willing to hear a good argument from the other side, but this ain't it. Waiting to hear an actual sentient being put forth his or her argument Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsfan Posted July 30, 2011 Share Posted July 30, 2011 I think an article entitled: "On the Misdiagnosis of Surface Temperature Feedbacks from Variations in Earth’s Radiant Energy Balance" would tell you everything you need to know about the 'objectivity' of the authors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.