Avernus Posted January 2, 2006 Share Posted January 2, 2006 Porter v. Burleson, Which do you take? DMD poo poo'ed me and my arguments to no end before finally locking the thread, but before it got locked, I tried to explain in the Porter ~ vs ~ Burleson debate, why I felt that Porter was going to end up being the better pick. If you go back and read the debate linked above, you'll see that my reasoning was sound. Final tally; Jerry Porter in 16 games (with him starting 14) had 76 receptions, for 942 yards, 5 TD's & a 12.4 ypc. Nate Burleson in 14 games (with him starting 9) had 30 receptions, for 328 yards, 1 TD's & a 10.9 ypc. Aside from myself, you're the only one to publicly come out with that stance Avernus. 1244760[/snapback] I am probably the most slept on huddler Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted January 2, 2006 Share Posted January 2, 2006 Though Big Score WAS correct in assessing Norv's pass-happiness - the Raiders were 6th in pass attempts and 30th in rushing attempts through 15 games and 25th in scoring defense. 1244714[/snapback] Of course, you DO notice that Turner pounded Lamont Jordan and gave him lots of goal-line work making for a nicely productive year....like I'd been trying to tell you all preseason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clubfoothead Posted January 2, 2006 Share Posted January 2, 2006 900 and 10 TDs and 894174[/snapback] Given he had 1025 and 9 I'll call that a successful prediction. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.