Chavez Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Marshawn Lynch 6 carries for -1 yards 1 catch for -7 yards oh, and a fumble. Clearly, this game is not a battle of which team is better....rather, which one suck less. Ted Thompson is clearly a fool for not trading for this top-level talent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeeR Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 lmfao @ "top level talent" Rams are gonna piss the playoffs away tonight. tsk tsk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theprofessor Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Sam Bradford is awful tonight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushwacked Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Ted Thompson is clearly a fool for not trading for this top-level talent. I'd think you'd see the problems with the offensive line. And Lynch has as many rushing yards than Steven Jackson at this point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunday Couch Potatoe Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 (edited) I think they are both saying "oh no you go ahead and win" oh no I insist you go again and win". Then they can start there vacation now and not have to go through one more week of practice and prep to just get embarassed by N.O. and laughed at by all the media and announcers involved next week!! Edited January 3, 2011 by Sunday Couch Potatoe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainHook Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 somebody's gonna make a hugh mistake here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunday Couch Potatoe Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 somebody's gonna make a hugh mistake here Ya..... mistake will be winning this game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loaf Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 somebody's gonna make a hugh mistake here whoever wins here is gonna bow out as fast as the Colts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushwacked Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Ya..... mistake will be winning this game No doubt the winner of this game gets slammed next week, but I can only assume you watched the NFC West this year as a 49er fan? You're the kid in special ed trying to make fun of the normal kids who fell behind the rest of the class. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainHook Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 whoever wins here is gonna bow out as fast as the Colts. Go Browns? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theprofessor Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Sam Bradford is awful tonight. Pretty bad when Charlie Whitehurst outplays you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 I'd think you'd see the problems with the offensive line. And Lynch has as many rushing yards than Steven Jackson at this point. Have you seen GB attempt to run-block? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myhousekey Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 (edited) Rams seemed to have forgotten S Jackson plays for them tonight. 1 carry in the 1st quarter. 11 carries for the game. Edited January 3, 2011 by myhousekey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
montster Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Wow. Isn't that like the third time in the past couple weeks that a team gets some phantom first down? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeeR Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 whoever wins here is gonna bow out as fast as the Colts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainHook Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 So how 'bout making a rule that if you win the division with a losing record, you forfeit the berth. #5 becomes the #4 seed and gets a home game. #6 becomes the #5 seed. #7 becomes the #6 seed. The Giants or Bucs deserve to be in the playoffs. Not either of these two teams. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushwacked Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Have you seen GB attempt to run-block? Have you seen Aaron Rodgers try to offset that with his ability compared to a 32 year old one armed turnover machine and a career 3rd string QB? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunday Couch Potatoe Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 No doubt the winner of this game gets slammed next week, but I can only assume you watched the NFC West this year as a 49er fan? You're the kid in special ed trying to make fun of the normal kids who fell behind the rest of the class. Brilliant!!! Like I care that much about it just observing like every other skeptic of the West teams!! I've been over trying to make fun of any of the "Normal Kids" in the NFC west months ago Pffff.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
byron2112 Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 this is awful... I think I'd prefer watching women's soccer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
montster Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 So how 'bout making a rule that if you win the division with a losing record, you forfeit the berth. #5 becomes the #4 seed and gets a home game. #6 becomes the #5 seed. #7 becomes the #6 seed. The Giants or Bucs deserve to be in the playoffs. Not either of these two teams. Then what would be the point of winning your division? You should still get a playoff berth, but I don't think they necessarily need to automatically grant division winners with home games. Reseed the teams and give the home games to the top four seeds. There's no way the Saints should have to travel to Seattle instead of the other way around. Then again, the Seahawks could upset the Saints and make us all look like fools. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunday Couch Potatoe Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 (edited) Then what would be the point of winning your division? You should still get a playoff berth, but I don't think they necessarily need to automatically grant division winners with home games. Reseed the teams and give the home games to the top four seeds.There's no way the Saints should have to travel to Seattle instead of the other way around.Then again, the Seahawks could upset the Saints and make us all look like fools. Agree just like no way the Ravens at 12-4 should have to travel to the 10-6 Chiefs Edited January 3, 2011 by Sunday Couch Potatoe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainHook Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 Then what would be the point of winning your division? You should still get a playoff berth, but I don't think they necessarily need to automatically grant division winners with home games. Reseed the teams and give the home games to the top four seeds. There's no way the Saints should have to travel to Seattle instead of the other way around. Then again, the Seahawks could upset the Saints and make us all look like fools. Because you didn't have a winning record. Don't really deserve anything, IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evil_gop_liars Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 There's no way the Saints should have to travel to Seattle instead of the other way around. I hope the Saints travel to Seattle on foot...maybe go through Canada....and drink heavily before arriving.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunday Couch Potatoe Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 (edited) Because you didn't have a winning record. Don't really deserve anything, IMO. Then they shouldn't have divisions at all because what would be the point of it? Just scramble the schedules every year so you don't play the same teams every year and take the top six records over all...Then there wouldn't be this ongoing issue of a non deserving team making it over a deserving team!! Edited January 3, 2011 by Sunday Couch Potatoe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunday Couch Potatoe Posted January 3, 2011 Share Posted January 3, 2011 I think all four road teams have better records than their hosts, yeah? Ya believe so....crazy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.