irish Posted September 19, 2005 Share Posted September 19, 2005 my team-QB-brady and leftwich, RB- tomlinson, k. jones, carnell williams, c. brown, barlow, m. turner WR- c. johnson, a. johnson, rod smith, lee evans, b. Lloyd TE- witten I've been offered 2 trades what do you think i should do? 1st- i give up brady and caddy for culpepper and lamont jordan. 2nd- i give up c. brown, barlow and a. johnson and get j. horn, a. green and m. faulk 1pt-10yds rush/rec or 20yds pass, 5pts-rush/rec td 3pts- pass ts we start 1 QB, 2 RBs, 3 WRs, TE, K Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ts Posted September 19, 2005 Share Posted September 19, 2005 Avoid trade #1 Jump all over trade #2 ... fast. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irish Posted September 19, 2005 Author Share Posted September 19, 2005 you don't think trade one is a good deal for me culpepper's value is down and should rebound and l. jordan has a pretty decent sched. i do think caddy is going to be great and really becomes a weekly starter over k.jones but brady never really lights it up he's just consistent Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Holy Roller Posted September 19, 2005 Share Posted September 19, 2005 Ye to the above. Hurry with #2 before she chickens out Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ts Posted September 19, 2005 Share Posted September 19, 2005 you don't think trade one is a good deal for me culpepper's value is down and should rebound and l. jordan has a pretty decent sched. i do think caddy is going to be great and really becomes a weekly starter over k.jones but brady never really lights it up he's just consistent 1001270[/snapback] Trade #1 is not a bad deal, I just don't think it helps you all that much. In trade #2 however, you give up 2 stiffs (Brown/Barlow) and a decent WR in AJ who is on a team so bad that he'll have somewhat limited value ... in return, you get a near-stud WR (Horn) plus Green (a viable starter if no longer a stud) and Faulk, who really has not that much less value than Barlow. Back to trade #1 for a moment ... as you said, Brady may not be sexy, but he consistently puts up good if not spectacular numbers ... there are worse things in FF than consistency. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irish Posted September 19, 2005 Author Share Posted September 19, 2005 true i guess thanks TS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irish Posted September 19, 2005 Author Share Posted September 19, 2005 bump a little more advice needed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jarhead Posted September 19, 2005 Share Posted September 19, 2005 (edited) you don't think trade one is a good deal for me culpepper's value is down and should rebound and l. jordan has a pretty decent sched. i do think caddy is going to be great and really becomes a weekly starter over k.jones but brady never really lights it up he's just consistent 1001270[/snapback] NO MEANS NO Edited September 19, 2005 by jarhead Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jarhead Posted September 19, 2005 Share Posted September 19, 2005 bump a little more advice needed 1001332[/snapback] THE BRADY FOR CULPEPPER IS GOOD IT'S THE CADDY FOR JORDAN THAT IS NOT SEE IF HE'LL DO BRADY FOR CPEP..I BET HE WON'T THE 2ND DEAL IS GOOD TO GO. DO IT NOW!! BTW DROP FAULK AFTER THE TRADE..LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irish Posted September 19, 2005 Author Share Posted September 19, 2005 o....k... thanks for the input jarhead. i was just wondering-culpepper was the best fantasy QB by more scoring system last yr and i have the opportunity to get him while his value is low. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irish Posted September 19, 2005 Author Share Posted September 19, 2005 i planned on dropping faulk and picking up b. engram Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slickvick Posted September 19, 2005 Share Posted September 19, 2005 I like deal #2 for sure.I have Brady as my starter also and like the idea of knowing what I am going to get every week with the occasional big game thrown in there.I had Jake the snake last year and he about drove me to drink!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irish Posted September 19, 2005 Author Share Posted September 19, 2005 thanks for the input fellas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.