dmarc117 Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 Hillary Clinton’s campaign hypocrisy continues to know no bounds. It is rather unbelievable that Clinton would listen in to conversations being conducted by political opponents, but refuse to allow our intelligence agencies to listen in to conversations being conducted by terrorists as they plot and plan to kill us. Team Clinton can expect to see and hear this over and over again over the course of the next year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
isleseeya Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 Which cracker jox box did you get this from ? Really not an issue for me as hillary would not get myvote unless chimpy was allowed to run a third term ( which Thank God ) he could not Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clubfoothead Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 hillary clinton = trojan horse Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursa Majoris Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 Anybody know what this silly twit is blathering about? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wirehairman Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 I think he is referring to this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh 0ne Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 Anybody know what this silly twit is blathering about? Does anyone really care? Dtard's the UT of politics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushwacked Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 Dtard's the UT of politics. Good info here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yukon Cornelius Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 Does anyone really care? Dtard's the UT of politics. wurd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cre8tiff Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 D tard You know, that works. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmarc117 Posted October 16, 2007 Author Share Posted October 16, 2007 i need 2 more responses and i'll have all the monkeys chiming in........come on chimpys!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yukon Cornelius Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 i need 2 more responses and i'll have all the monkeys chiming in........come on chimpys!!!! if you were not a girl i punch u in the mouth .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cre8tiff Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 .come on chimpys Talk about ironic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmarc117 Posted October 16, 2007 Author Share Posted October 16, 2007 if you were not a girl i punch u in the mouth .. quiet cheetah, you already chimed in huddle libs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushwacked Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 if you were not a girl i punch u in the mouth .. wurd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh 0ne Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 quiet cheetah, you already chimed in huddle libs Hate to disappoint you, but the non-libs, myself included, think yer a tard too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmarc117 Posted October 16, 2007 Author Share Posted October 16, 2007 this is easier than running buffalo off a cliff. dumb dumb libbys Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmarc117 Posted October 16, 2007 Author Share Posted October 16, 2007 (edited) Hate to disappoint you, but the non-libs, myself included, think yer a tard too. you enjoy running so your thought process is in question anyways. but thanks for chiming in. u keep good company with da chimps. Edited October 16, 2007 by dmarc117 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cre8tiff Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 You know, it is quite interesting how this thread is a microcosm of the current White House. First they take an action they think is totally logical, that will make them look smart, gain them notoriety and make thier constituents feel good. Then when faced with the truth that, in fact, what they just said or did was totally moranic, they turn to name calling. When that doesn't work, they attempt in a totally transparent way to assert they had intended the result of thier actions. In fact, the people who are pointing out that first action was ignorant are the moranic ones, because the "just don't get it". I believe the next thing to come would be how everyone else is a traitor and unpatriotic for not going along with the first action. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmarc117 Posted October 16, 2007 Author Share Posted October 16, 2007 (edited) You know, it is quite interesting how this thread is a microcosm of the current White House. First they take an action they think is totally logical, that will make them look smart, gain them notoriety and make thier constituents feel good. Then when faced with the truth that, in fact, what they just said or did was totally moranic, they turn to name calling. When that doesn't work, they attempt in a totally transparent way to assert they had intended the result of thier actions. In fact, the people who are pointing out that first action was ignorant are the moranic ones, because the "just don't get it". I believe the next thing to come would be how everyone else is a traitor and unpatriotic for not going along with the first action. i speak fact and truth. if the truth hurts, let it speak. edit: you traitor monkey Edited October 16, 2007 by dmarc117 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheShiznit Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 QUOTE Hillary Clinton’s campaign hypocrisy continues to know no bounds. It is rather unbelievable that Clinton would listen in to conversations being conducted by political opponents, but refuse to allow our intelligence agencies to listen in to conversations being conducted by terrorists as they plot and plan to kill us. Team Clinton can expect to see and hear this over and over again over the course of the next year. How much of an idiot does this guy take us for. Dmarc...surveillance of cell phones by the American Government is not only acceptable...but fricken mandatory! The USSC has already ruled that your expectation of privacy is substantially less using cell phones and cordless phones than if you are using a wired land line phone. The way the Constitutional Rule reads is that those types of communication are not subject to the warrant requirement if it is picked up using scanners and the like. So, why don't you tell the truth when you post versus having to lie to make your point. Noone likes a liar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmarc117 Posted October 16, 2007 Author Share Posted October 16, 2007 QUOTEHillary Clinton’s campaign hypocrisy continues to know no bounds. It is rather unbelievable that Clinton would listen in to conversations being conducted by political opponents, but refuse to allow our intelligence agencies to listen in to conversations being conducted by terrorists as they plot and plan to kill us. Team Clinton can expect to see and hear this over and over again over the course of the next year. How much of an idiot does this guy take us for. Dmarc...surveillance of cell phones by the American Government is not only acceptable...but fricken mandatory! The USSC has already ruled that your expectation of privacy is substantially less using cell phones and cordless phones than if you are using a wired land line phone. The way the Constitutional Rule reads is that those types of communication are not subject to the warrant requirement if it is picked up using scanners and the like. So, why don't you tell the truth when you post versus having to lie to make your point. Noone likes a liar. it took you that long to come with this. i will reply to you when you learn to quote properly. carry on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheShiznit Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 it took you that long to come with this. i will reply to you when you learn to quote properly. carry on. IOW...you are a dumb@$$ and have nothing to argue with but complete lies. Typical neo-con destructor of all things conservative. Why don't you get Vanna on the line so you can buy a vowel....cause you don't have a clue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmarc117 Posted October 16, 2007 Author Share Posted October 16, 2007 IOW...you are a dumb@$$ and have nothing to argue with but complete lies. Typical neo-con destructor of all things conservative. Why don't you get Vanna on the line so you can buy a vowel....cause you don't have a clue. thats witty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheShiznit Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 thats witty It is better than what you got...which is lying...oh yeah and nothing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmarc117 Posted October 16, 2007 Author Share Posted October 16, 2007 It is better than what you got...which is lying...oh yeah and nothing. i speak only facts. im a facts machine! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.