Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

A. Peterson for LT straight up?


fathazam
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 team league, 6 pts for TD, 1 pt per 20 yards, no PPR, no dynasty or keeper

 

He wants to give me LT for Peterson straight up. Currently i'm tied for first in the league and hes 8th in a 12 man league.

 

My RB's as of now:

A. Peterson

Lynch

Edge

LJ

 

I can do 3 each week with the flex.

 

He tossed out the idea yesterday and I thought it would be a great idea, but now that AD went off today i'm starting to wonder if I should even do this. He has no other guys on his team that I would consider trading for. I feel like I'd gain some consistency with LT, as i'm still stinging from AP's 70 yard outing last week. I'm clueless on this one. Maybe i'm just enamored by the though of starting LJ, LT, and Edge/Lynch. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks all.

 

I'll reply to yours if you reply to mine.

Edited by fathazam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that AP is more feast or famine than LT, but I wouldn't make this trade right now. AP has solidified himself as the #1 RB in Minnesota. All things being equal, I like AP's schedule more than LT's down the stretch as well. If he really wants AP that badly, maybe he can sweeten the deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are set for the playoffs, I may make this trade. LT plays DET and DEN at home in weeks 15 and 16. I have LT and was considering a trade for AP, but for that very reason, I am keeping him.

 

FWIW, I'm not sure I'd consider the Lions' run D an easy matchup these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just made this trade last week and was catchign heat for making an inside trade. I told all the complaining memebers the trade i had made was fair both ways....the other player got AP, fargas, cotchery,deangello williams....now im sitting here with a sad face as i gave up WAY to much.......Ap for Lt is straight and i think Lt can only get better from here on out. Eventaully SD will realize when they dont run the man 20+ times they have little chance of winning. Needless to say yesterday was a long day and this week will be even longer as i continue to get posts via message board at what a moron i am fro trading AP.

Edited by ajb6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My thought was that he would hit the rookie wall as well. While i don't want to change a whole lot as i'm in first, I don't feel I shouldn't make a beneficial move just because of that. I'm still debating it really, I wish there was a definite yes or no on this one. Thanks for the continued advice all.

 

Also, in our league the playoffs is one week , week 17. Its only a small pot for that. The big money goes to the regular season winner with the best record. I'm more interested in that then the playoff week win.

Edited by fathazam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

PETERSON playoff wk 14,15,16 @ San Fran, Chi, Was

 

LT @Tenn, Det Den

 

it's pretty much a wash BUT we know that San Diego might not even make the playoffs this year, unlike the past few years where they were locked into the playoffs and rested LT and don't forget TURNER (can't remember is he injured??)

 

 

if it were me i would just stick with what you got, your in 1st place WHY mess with it, if it ain't broken??????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

----------------LT will also catch more passes and we know AP won't have another game like that, i hope he don't atleast when he goes against me.

 

HECK WITH ALL THOSE RB'S try improving your WR's or QB.........

 

He wants to give me LT for Peterson straight up. Currently i'm tied for first in the league and hes 8th in a 12 man league.

 

My RB's as of now:

A. Peterson

Lynch

Edge

LJ

 

I can do 3 each week with the flex.

 

He tossed out the idea yesterday and I thought it would be a great idea, but now that AD went off today i'm starting to wonder if I should even do this. He has no other guys on his team that I would consider trading for. I feel like I'd gain some consistency with LT, as i'm still stinging from AP's 70 yard outing last week. I'm clueless on this one. Maybe i'm just enamored by the though of starting LJ, LT, and Edge/Lynch. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks all.

 

I'll reply to yours if you reply to mine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My league is a bunch of old guys who for the most part will not trade no matter what the offer and don't even respond to trades, there is 3 of us who do trades maybe. None of them have a QB I would desire, the only QB's I would trade for are named Brady, Peyton, and Romo. Otherwise I'm fine with big ben. As far as wide receivers go i'm pretty good in that area too as I only play 1 WR a week when I'm playing 3 RB's a week. (I also play A. Gates every week as well).

 

I'm leaning towards keeping AP right now as it seems like the smart move albeit a higher variance move. I think it's just the name LT that is making me question myself. Plus in our league before this weekend, AP had 6 more points than LT. After this pass weekend you can do the math. Standing Pat.

 

 

I'm going to start trying to talk him into LJ and 1 other guy on my team for LT. That would be a stunner if I can pull that off.

Edited by fathazam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information