Henry Muto Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 If you were in a dynasty league where you keep all your players for as long as you want what would you want for Jamaal Charles in return if you were going to trade him ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Country Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 Depends on my current RB situation and what my other needs are. I'm not sold on him being a stud back yet, so if I could get something in return with a greater chance of being an every week contributor or long term value to my squad, I would do it. If all I was getting offered was 2nd round picks in a rookie draft, I'd rather hold on to Charles. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henry Muto Posted January 13, 2010 Author Share Posted January 13, 2010 I traded Charles mid season for Boldin before he had done anything and Boldin was hurt. I figured I was getting a good deal buy low guy in Boldin for a guy who had never done a thing in the NFL and wow did that turn out bad. I feel pretty sick about it now. I was just trying to see how badly I got hammered in this deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
airupthere67 Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 I'm not sold on Charles yet either. The guy who has him in my full roster dynasty keeper wanted 2 top 5 1sts in the rooke draft for him. Then, after his last game, he upped the price to 3 top 5 1sts! I think he's totally nuts. I wouldn't have paid the 2 1sts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Country Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 I traded Charles mid season for Boldin before he had done anything and Boldin was hurt. I figured I was getting a good deal buy low guy in Boldin for a guy who had never done a thing in the NFL and wow did that turn out bad. I feel pretty sick about it now. I was just trying to see how badly I got hammered in this deal. In a dynasty league, half a season is way too early to tell what side of the deal you were on. In the immediate term, especially due to injury to Boldin, you were on the bad end. In the long term, you will see. Assuming I had starting RBs in place on my squad at the time of the deal and could use the extra WR, it looks like it was probably a no-brain deal for you to make at the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zooty Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 Count me as not sold either. Also depends on roster make-up but I think most players would be a steal for him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donutrun Jellies Posted January 16, 2010 Share Posted January 16, 2010 Charles? Getting/keeping him risks cluttering up your roster with RBs who produce yards and TDs when you can have unproven rookies or unreliables or past their primes ... It all depends on your strategic emphasis -- players that sound sexy in your sig or players who earn the most points. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.