Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

JP Morgan


MojoMan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Ever since 2008, big banks have been under a HUGH microscope. One of the biggest fights, both on Wall Street and in Washington is the regulation vs. deregulation struggle. 2 Billion dollars, in fact, isn't a ton of money to JPM. But, to the guy in the street, and the politicians who are out to push their agenda, and the guy writing the headlines for your local paper or Yahoo News, 2 billion dollars is an eye-catching number. And this is why Jamie Dimon (JPM's CEO) is downplaying it, while so many other people are panicking over it. They're both kinda right, but coming at it from different perspectives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the things that shocked me after the first big crash was the extent to which all the big banks' wagers were leveraged. I always assumed banks only invested money they actually had, silly me. Imagine if random joe dickhead could take out a $10,000 loan and tell the lender he has a good feeling about the home team this weekend, that would make about as much sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

$2B for JPMorgan is nothing but the fact that they ever lose money on a quarterly statement is a shocker to me considering they can manipulate the market via high frequency trading....it's almost like they decided to lose...

 

but another thing that bothers me is "why is this even news?"....the major media outlets are reporting this almost in a way that says (and one of them said this almost verbatim) "if JP Morgan can't make money in today's market, then who can?"...

 

why even paint things in this picture in regards to the markets...especially in an election year? :thinking:

 

I really don't have an answer or direction, but these are some of my thoughts among many when I see this headline pop up left and right as of late....

 

the real question you should be asking is "why is this even headlining major websites and such?"....that is what bothers me.....the $2B loss for them is like a $20 loss for me....whoops there goes the money to buy Avengers on Blu-ray...:kicksrock:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the things that shocked me after the first big crash was the extent to which all the big banks' wagers were leveraged. I always assumed banks only invested money they actually had, silly me. Imagine if random joe dickhead could take out a $10,000 loan and tell the lender he has a good feeling about the home team this weekend, that would make about as much sense.

 

 

wait....can I do that?...

 

or I can just put it towards a session of blackjack....I feel more confident in my blackjack game anyways....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And as "Mark to Market" has taken trillions off of balance sheets - let's nominate weigie to explain it. If not, I surely can.

 

I'm going to guess weigie's version doesn't involve Obama's birth certificate?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm the first to admit that I'm a finance dumb@$$ so I'm hoping for a knowledgable answer.

 

 

 

Here ya go....

 

Look up "Mark to Market." There you will find your answer.

 

 

:kicksrock:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information