irish Posted November 7, 2014 Share Posted November 7, 2014 (edited) My team QB - Rodgers RBs - Charles, foster, Chris Johnson, Richardson, K. Davis WRs - Wayne, Wright, Patterson, Jennings, Britt, shorts, Malcolm Floyd TEs - walker, Cameron K - Tucker DEF - Bills In a 12-team 1 PPR league starting 1 QB, 2-3 RBs, 2-3 WRs, 1-2 TEs, K and Def, I was just offered 3 deals - #1 I give up Wayne for Vincent Jackson and Andre Holmes. #2 I give up Rodgers and Wayne for cam Newton and Emmanuel Sanders. #3 I give up Rodgers, Chris Johnson, Trent Richardson and Wayne for Kaep, Rashad Jennings, Steven Jackson and Jeffery. Which do you do? I'm torn between #1and #3. I hate the idea of losing Rodgers but getting upgrades elsewhere might make up for it. Edited November 7, 2014 by irish Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IrishPride Posted November 7, 2014 Share Posted November 7, 2014 3 is the Risk/Reward, 1 is the safe bet but 3 makes your team better? #3 is my final answer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irish Posted November 7, 2014 Author Share Posted November 7, 2014 3 is the Risk/Reward, 1 is the safe bet but 3 makes your team better? #3 is my final answer. #3 is my favorite. If Kaep can play better it's a homerun! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irish Posted November 7, 2014 Author Share Posted November 7, 2014 Bump Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finn5033 Posted November 7, 2014 Share Posted November 7, 2014 Giving up Rodgers is tough. I agree #3 is ok but you don't need Jennings since you don't have a flex spot. I say try to get 2 good WR from him. Does he have another WR to give up? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irish Posted November 7, 2014 Author Share Posted November 7, 2014 Giving up Rodgers is tough. I agree #3 is ok but you don't need Jennings since you don't have a flex spot. I say try to get 2 good WR from him. Does he have another WR to give up? I do have 1 flex spot. I have to play 2 of each RB, WR and 1 TE. Then I have 1 flex of RB, WR or TE. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finn5033 Posted November 7, 2014 Share Posted November 7, 2014 I do have 1 flex spot. I have to play 2 of each RB, WR and 1 TE. Then I have 1 flex of RB, WR or TE. Well than I do like #3. As others said thoough it is risk reward. You're almost guaranteed at least 20pts form Rodgers every week. But plugging in Kaep, Jefferey, and Jennings when he comes back has the potential for huge production. I say go for it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blasto95 Posted November 7, 2014 Share Posted November 7, 2014 I have kaep.. I love half the games he has left. But I'm scrambling for a qb2. Week 15 is championship week for my league. Kaep plays Seattle weeks 13 and 15 so I'm really hoping for a better option to arise. Other than that his matchups are really nice and he's been very consistent. Right now I have tannehill who plays either Jac or nyj week 13 and NE week 15 which I'm not a fan of but like more than seattle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irish Posted November 7, 2014 Author Share Posted November 7, 2014 (edited) I have kaep.. I love half the games he has left. But I'm scrambling for a qb2. Week 15 is championship week for my league. Kaep plays Seattle weeks 13 and 15 so I'm really hoping for a better option to arise. Other than that his matchups are really nice and he's been very consistent. Right now I have tannehill who plays either Jac or nyj week 13 and NE week 15 which I'm not a fan of but like more than seattle I think kaep can be great but Rodgers will more than likely be better. It's hard to pass on the upside of Jeffery and Jennings over Wayne and CJ or t rich. Forgot to mention I do have RG3 too. Edited November 7, 2014 by irish Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blasto95 Posted November 7, 2014 Share Posted November 7, 2014 I would rather play waivers for one maybe two weeks at qb. And have kaep for his other good matchups. Then possibly play the waivers or be forced to start CJ/trich over Jennings/Jeffery. I'd feel good about taking that trade. With rg3 you already have a good option qb2 and if he does have a bad matchup the same week, playing waivers with qbs can be a lot easier than skill positions Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irish Posted November 7, 2014 Author Share Posted November 7, 2014 I would rather play waivers for one maybe two weeks at qb. And have kaep for his other good matchups. Then possibly play the waivers or be forced to start CJ/trich over Jennings/Jeffery. I'd feel good about taking that trade. With rg3 you already have a good option qb2 and if he does have a bad matchup the same week, playing waivers with qbs can be a lot easier than skill positions RG3 has the giants and eagles in weeks 15&16, not too mention the Bucs and the Colts o over the 2nd half. He has a pretty good schedule. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.