loaf Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 wow you really butchered the dude's last name Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boltnlava Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 3 minutes ago, loaf said: wow you really butchered the dude's last name we know who he is tho...right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevegrab Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 34 minutes ago, loaf said: wow you really butchered the dude's last name I just refer to him as Crapola (or Jimmy G) rather than try to remember how to spell it (2 P or 2 L, where are the As vs Os). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesplante11 Posted October 31, 2017 Author Share Posted October 31, 2017 (edited) 2 hours ago, loaf said: wow you really butchered the dude's last name I would remember it if I needed to buy a jersey with it written on it, but no need now especially since ESPN lets me search first names unlike years past Edited October 31, 2017 by jamesplante11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tripleshot Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 2 hours ago, LordOpie said: what about this crazy idea... SF shows off Garapolo and then packages him up with picks next off-season to acquire Cousins' rights. Then WAS still has a QB that might be something. Except the Niners would have to sign/franchise him first as he's in the last year of his contract? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gourdeau Posted November 1, 2017 Share Posted November 1, 2017 Anyone else think this is an immediate uptick for guys like Goodwin on the 9ers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doobwaa Posted November 1, 2017 Share Posted November 1, 2017 3 minutes ago, Gourdeau said: Anyone else think this is an immediate uptick for guys like Goodwin on the 9ers. I would be an uptick .....and my shoulder is shot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gourdeau Posted November 1, 2017 Share Posted November 1, 2017 16 minutes ago, doobwaa said: I would be an uptick .....and my shoulder is shot LOL fair Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loaf Posted November 1, 2017 Share Posted November 1, 2017 immediate uptick when he starts to play, which looks like week 12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inziladun Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 Either his attempt at coach speak or they're even dumber than their second round pick for a backup QB suggests. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevegrab Posted November 2, 2017 Share Posted November 2, 2017 Coach speak + just not handing the guy the job. It was said right away they'd be waiting until after their bye at least. Shanahan has a complicated offense, it will take time for Jimmy G to digest it. Being up front and saying "no gaurantee he becomes the starter" is just settting everybody's expectations. Also this is more about the future for SF than this year. At most they want to use him to help evaluate other talent on offense, get him signed to a long term deal (or franchise him) and have him as their QB next year. I doubt he sits all year and does not play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesplante11 Posted November 5, 2017 Author Share Posted November 5, 2017 On 10/31/2017 at 2:01 PM, LordOpie said: what about this crazy idea... SF shows off Garapolo and then packages him up with picks next off-season to acquire Cousins' rights. Then WAS still has a QB that might be something. Per Schefter, the 49ers might not sign Jimmy to a long term deal. They are looking to tag-trade him this offseason Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevegrab Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 1 minute ago, LordOpie said: they shouldn't have tipped their hand, they should've signed him, and then traded him because signing him now would've been way less money than tagging him. can they tender him? I think a 1st round tender is very cheap compared to tagging? Then they can trade him. But they're dumb if they're not going to consider him for the future. I think John Lynch is trying to get too creative. Maybe they're leaking false info. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevegrab Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 6 minutes ago, LordOpie said: i'm not sure how that info, as false, would benefit the team? can you think of some ideas why that would be useful? No idea, a bit early for such critical thinking :-) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tazinib1 Posted November 5, 2017 Share Posted November 5, 2017 His asking price was too high. The Patriots didn't want to sign him to a ridiculous Brock Osweiler deal so they traded him for a #2. Again, the Patriots prove smarter than everyone else. The 49'rs are gonna have a hard time justifying an $18M for a QB if they don't see what they got and start him this year and add on the reality they will have a top 3 pick in the draft....well...there ya go. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.