cspoerl Posted November 23, 2004 Share Posted November 23, 2004 Henson starts.. Whitten's value tanks Your thoughts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted November 23, 2004 Share Posted November 23, 2004 Henson starts..Whitten's value tanks Your thoughts? 571200[/snapback] I brought this up a week ago... ehh..Henson needs to throw to someone...he's their #2 wideout...and rookies usually throw to the TE more often... he's a safety valve... why do you think Shockey is already lobbying for Manning in NY?.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skrappy1 Posted November 23, 2004 Share Posted November 23, 2004 Its The End Of The Whitten As We Know It Yes it is. He is now known as Witten. Dallas has a rookie QB, a rookie RB, and no WRs to speak of. Witten should be fine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolv Posted November 23, 2004 Share Posted November 23, 2004 Witten was due for a down week. I wouldn't expect his numbers to stay down tho. Start him with confidence, for the reasons said above. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJR Posted November 23, 2004 Share Posted November 23, 2004 How about starting him this week at TE vs. starting Jermaine Wiggins? I've got that dilemma on my hands. Witten w/ a rookie QB vs. the Colts?...and Wiggins vs. the Pack on MNF....Moss may still not be back? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balzac Posted November 23, 2004 Share Posted November 23, 2004 Henson starts..Whitten's value tanks Your thoughts? 571200[/snapback] I think he'll be fine. They've got a rook under center and we all know how much Parcells digs making the TE a prominent part of the offense. Don't worry about last week - BALT has been shutting down TEs all year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin3 Posted November 23, 2004 Share Posted November 23, 2004 (edited) Yes it is. He is now known as Witten. Dallas has a rookie QB, a rookie RB, and no WRs to speak of. Witten should be fine. 571286[/snapback] Dangit you stole my line! And is there a good reason many on this board can't differentiate between "advice" and "advise"? I mean, aside from Codie, that is. Edited November 23, 2004 by darin3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skrappy1 Posted November 24, 2004 Share Posted November 24, 2004 And is there a good reason many on this board can't differentiate between "advice" and "advise"? I mean, aside from Codie, that is. 572123[/snapback] Glad I'm not the only one to notice the whole advise/advice thing...there's a difference in tense there people. And many on these boards, as well as some who write columns for certain fantasy sites, also can't differentiate between "lose" and "loose." I guess our school systems aren't doing so hot, huh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighKite Posted November 24, 2004 Share Posted November 24, 2004 I think it could hurt Witten myself..although I still think he is very servicable...Testeverde was in tune with him..I can't see Henson being as tuned in with him as Testeverde was..but us Witten owners can hope and see can't we? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.