Purdue Pete Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 12 Team - Performance Scoring New Rule this year where coaches vote on Trades I know I should just let it go, but it looks like the Buc's are giving up ? Husband and Wife trade - Red Wings (6-1) Offer: McCown, Josh (QB Ari) Warner, Kurt (QB Ari) Clayton, Michael (WR TB) Overall Defense (TB) Buccaneers (0-7) Offer: Hasselbeck, Matt (QB Sea) Driver, Donald (WR GB) Overall Defense (Car) Just curious what other Huddlers think ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peepinmofo Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 Would need to see rosters, but it looks lopsided to me. I mean both Hass. and Driver are better then any AZ QB, and Clayton has yet to do anything. Only the defense is an upgrade for the 1st team, and its minor at best. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T_bone65 Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 I don't see any problems with this trade. Hasselback doesn't even have any recievers to throw to anymore, that is Alexanders team IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jarhead Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 it is a little lobsided, but fair Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purdue Pete Posted October 26, 2005 Author Share Posted October 26, 2005 Would need to see rosters, but it looks lopsided to me. I mean both Hass. and Driver are better then any AZ QB, and Clayton has yet to do anything. Only the defense is an upgrade for the 1st team, and its minor at best. 1098158[/snapback] Buccanears (0-7) QB Hasselbeck, Matt Sea 8 54.00 QB Manning, Eli NYG 5 17.00 RB Anderson, Mike Den 9 5.00 RB Benson, Cedric Chi 4 20.00 RB Griffin, Quentin 8.00 RB Jones, Julius Dal 9 26.40 RB Jordan, LaMont Oak 5 15.00 WR Clayton, Mark Bal 3 10.00 WR Driver, Donald GB 6 48.40 WR McCardell, Keenan SD 10 16.00 WR Smith, Rod Den 9 42.90 WR Toomer, Amani NYG 5 24.00 WR Williamson, Troy Min 5 20.00 TE Putzier, Jeb Den 9 20.00 TE Shockey, Jeremy NYG 5 31.90 K Janikowski, Sebastian Oak 5 12.00 K Kasay, John Car 7 12.00 O/D Carolina Car 7 35.00 O/D Denver Den 9 15.00 Red Wings (6-1) QB Green, Trent KC 5 77.00 QB McCown, Josh Ari 6 19.00 QB Warner, Kurt Ari 6 29.00 RB Alexander, Shaun Sea 8 49.50 RB Droughns, Reuben Cle 4 35.00 RB Foster, DeShaun Car 7 12.00 RB Lewis, Jamal Bal 3 27.50 WR Burress, Plaxico NYG 5 23.00 WR Clayton, Michael TB 7 41.00 WR Johnson, Chad Cin 10 50.60 WR Lelie, Ashley Den 9 33.00 WR Price, Peerless Dal 9 12.00 WR Warrick, Peter Sea 8 8.00 TE Heap, Todd Bal 3 16.00 TE Smith, Alex TB 7 20.00 K Graham, Shayne Cin 10 12.00 K Vinatieri, Adam NE 7 27.00 O/D Tampa Bay TB 7 34.00 O/D Washington Was 3 18.50 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zooty Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 Haha Looks shady to me. better team getting Hass & Driver for a QB mess & A hurt WR (defenses are a wash) May be tough to void as it isn't grossly lopsided. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purdue Pete Posted October 26, 2005 Author Share Posted October 26, 2005 HahaLooks shady to me. better team getting Hass & Driver for a QB mess & A hurt WR (defenses are a wash) May be tough to void as it isn't grossly lopsided. 1098226[/snapback] My sentiments exactly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearcatTom Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 The only thing that makes me wonder is Driver. The QBs in my opinion are a push, and actually think from a Fantasy perspective that McCown is better than Hass. The defs. Who cares. They both have favorable match ups down the line. The WR swap is what gives me pause, especially because it is a 4-3 trade, so the lower team will have to release someone else. With that said, not sure I'd veto it. I'd call the lower team and see what their thoughts were on the trade. If they answer what the heck does it matter, they are losing anyway, then I'd veto it. If they have a plausable answer, then you have to let it through. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purdue Pete Posted October 26, 2005 Author Share Posted October 26, 2005 The only thing that makes me wonder is Driver. The QBs in my opinion are a push, and actually think from a Fantasy perspective that McCown is better than Hass.1098451[/snapback] Even with the "rumor" that Warner might start ? At least with Hass you know what you got. The defs. Who cares. They both have favorable match ups down the line. 1098451[/snapback] Agree, this part didn't bother me. The WR swap is what gives me pause, especially because it is a 4-3 trade, so the lower team will have to release someone else. 1098451[/snapback] Salary Cap League, with a 30 man roster limit, the lower team does not have to drop anyone. With that said, not sure I'd veto it. I'd call the lower team and see what their thoughts were on the trade. If they answer what the heck does it matter, they are losing anyway, then I'd veto it. If they have a plausable answer, then you have to let it through. 1098451[/snapback] Not sure I'll get answer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wordup Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 This looks like the loser is giving up but both are trying to put a semblance of a fair trade together. The owners probably don't think it's collusion (hey! the bucs D is awesome right????) I'd approach the owners before making my vote. Otherwise, it feels like a veto. Although, could it be that there are inexperienced owners in the league? Wouldn't be a first... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuke'em ttg Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 let me guess.......he's tied with you.........nothing wrong with this trade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emandg Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 12 Team - Performance ScoringNew Rule this year where coaches vote on Trades I know I should just let it go, but it looks like the Buc's are giving up ? Husband and Wife trade - Red Wings (6-1) Offer: McCown, Josh (QB Ari) Warner, Kurt (QB Ari) Clayton, Michael (WR TB) Overall Defense (TB) Buccaneers (0-7) Offer: Hasselbeck, Matt (QB Sea) Driver, Donald (WR GB) Overall Defense (Car) Just curious what other Huddlers think ? 1098148[/snapback] The Red Wings run off with this trade - McCowen, Warner and Clayton are all crap Hassleback and Driver are solid starts and Carolina is a decent D. This trade is basically TB D for Driver and Hassleback - thats whack! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Cherni Posted October 26, 2005 Share Posted October 26, 2005 You can't veto that trade. They want to put their faith in Warner/McCown, take their donations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purdue Pete Posted October 26, 2005 Author Share Posted October 26, 2005 The majority of you (it appears) think that the RedWings are making out. and I agree. Normally, I wouldn't care about trades and whether one team or another was being taken advantage of. However, in this case the 6-1 RedWings (The Wife) is making a trade with her husband, Buccanears (0-7). It just "smells" a little fishy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.