gahs7 Posted June 8, 2006 Share Posted June 8, 2006 should i take L.T for Chad and benson 5 year keeper league, 1p per catch, 1pt per 10yds rec or rushing , 6pts per td, we keeper 8 each offseason my current team westbrook benson chad plaxico wayne gates rackers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh 0ne Posted June 8, 2006 Share Posted June 8, 2006 Yes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted June 8, 2006 Share Posted June 8, 2006 No. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jake_the_builder Posted June 8, 2006 Share Posted June 8, 2006 should i take L.T for Chad and benson 5 year keeper league, 1p per catch, 1pt per 10yds rec or rushing , 6pts per td, we keeper 8 each offseason my current team westbrook benson chad plaxico wayne gates rackers DO IT NOW BEFORE HE BACKS OUT! IMO, with Rivers at QB, LT will be HUGE receiving this year! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh 0ne Posted June 8, 2006 Share Posted June 8, 2006 No. Wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted June 8, 2006 Share Posted June 8, 2006 (edited) Wrong. FIVE yr keeper take a look at LTs numbers 2 of the past 3 decembers Edited June 8, 2006 by keggerz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted June 8, 2006 Share Posted June 8, 2006 (edited) FIVE yr keeper take a look at LTs numbers in 2 of the past 3 decembers Chad will still most likely be a top 5 WR in 5yrs and Benson has the talent to be a top 5ish RB(wont be this yr but next yr the gig is all his) so Chad + Benson > LT over the next 5 yrs Edited June 8, 2006 by keggerz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted June 8, 2006 Share Posted June 8, 2006 (edited) LT's 2005 December totals(5 Games) 376 rushing yards, 25.7% of his yrly rushing total 103 rushes, 30.4% of his yrly total 1 rushing TD, .05% of his yrly rushing TD Total LT's 2004 December totals(4 Games) 436 rushing yards, 32.7% of his yrly rushing total 102 rushes, 30.1% of his yrly total 6 Rushing TDs, 35.3% of his yrly rushing TD Total LT's 2003 December totals(4 Games) 473 rushing yards*, 28.8% of his rushing total *243 of it in wk17 *91 in week 16 *51 in week 15 *88 in week 14 98 rushes, 31.3% of his yrly carries 4 Rushing TDs, 22.2% of his yrly rushing TD Total so if you look at 2003 and 2005 you see that LT hasnt been his normal LT self in december(of course with the exception of that week 17 in 2003, you know that week its the one after just about everyones Super Bowl ) Edited June 8, 2006 by keggerz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loyalboyd Posted June 8, 2006 Share Posted June 8, 2006 Chad will still most likely be a top 5 WR in 5yrs and Benson has the talent to be a top 5ish RB(wont be this yr but next yr the gig is all his) so Chad + Benson > LT over the next 5 yrs I agree especially if you already had him for a few yrs. U will lose him so anyway. And I dont think LT can stay on top another 5 yrs anyway. Vs. Chad and Benson i can see them doing it for 5 yrs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrTed46 Posted June 8, 2006 Share Posted June 8, 2006 i would take LT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrTed46 Posted June 8, 2006 Share Posted June 8, 2006 i would take LT Benson sucks and will be a bust. Chad is awesome. The way I see it is your losing Chad for LT. I would do it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh 0ne Posted June 8, 2006 Share Posted June 8, 2006 Chad = head case with a gimpy QB. Benson = bust. LT = stud. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
General Itals Posted June 8, 2006 Share Posted June 8, 2006 Gotta agree with Hugh. Take the sure thing at RB, especially with the guys you have at that position currently. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muck Posted June 8, 2006 Share Posted June 8, 2006 Would he take Wayne or Plaxico instead? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gahs7 Posted June 8, 2006 Author Share Posted June 8, 2006 I have decided to make the deal. The reason i made it is L.T can have huge games and pairing him up with Westbrook is dangerous. We count 1pt per catch so westy is awsome. I also have Wayne and Plaxico and need to draft 1 more reciever to start as my 3rd reciever, i have gates at TE and rackers at Kicker. Here are all the players available in the draft, plenty of recievers to choose from. I could even trade L.T if I want for a player like steve smith and more, i know this allready. We start 1qb, 2rb's, 3 rec's, 1 TE, 1 kicker, 1 defense My keeper list is with 4 years remaining and i have plenty of draft picks L.T Westbrook Wayne Plaxico Lelie Gates Rackers here are the players available in the draft warner > bledsoe > delhomme > mcnair > collins > brunnell > t.green > cullpepper > brooks > vick > brees > farve > kitna > plummer > rotheslesburger > carr > simms > alex smith > kelly holcumb > billy voleck > ramsey > pennington > > > rb's - > > Dayne > m.barber > chris brown > t.henry > greg jones > gore > barlow > rhodes > > rookies rb's > > bush > josepth Addi -colts > dangelo Williams > L.White > L.Maroney > M.Drew > > > wr's -plenty of them > > Givens > Parker > Drew Bennett > Booker > Travis Taylor > Reggie Brown > Arnez Battle > Scott Vines > Troy Williams > Koren Robinson > Caldwell > Mark Bradley > P.Price > B.Engram > Bruce > Mcardell > Wilford > Ferguson > G.Lewis > J.Smith > Stokley > Muhammed > Burleson > Toomer > T.Glenn > Coles > J.Horn > Key Johnson > Moulds > Kennison > Jerry Porter > J.Jurivicous > M.Clayton > > rookies wr's > > Chad Jackson > S.Holmes > G.Jennings > S.Moss > > > TE > > V.Davis -rookie > Pollard > Mcmichael > Stevens > clark > troupe > wiggins > Mercedes Lewis-rookie > > all defenses are available except the bears > > all kickers available except rackers > > i'm sure i missed some players Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jake_the_builder Posted June 8, 2006 Share Posted June 8, 2006 Why are you keeping a Kicker? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh 0ne Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 Why are you keeping a Kicker? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loyalboyd Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 I bet its to throw off everyone and see who was paying attention. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
broncosn05 Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 +1 I'd do it... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gahs7 Posted June 9, 2006 Author Share Posted June 9, 2006 Why are you keeping a Kicker? in our league he averaged 18 ppg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muck Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 in our league he averaged 18 ppg And you think that with Edge, that he'll somehow kick as many (or more!) field goals than he did last year? Who else you got? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gahs7 Posted June 9, 2006 Author Share Posted June 9, 2006 And you think that with Edge, that he'll somehow kick as many (or more!) field goals than he did last year? Who else you got? kickers are big scores in our league my 8 keepers going into the season are L.T Westbrook Jamal lewis---i traded him for a draft pick Wayne Plaxico Lelie Gates Rackers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muck Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 kickers are big scores in our league While kickers are big scorers, you need to ask yourself whether Rackers will be a big scorer this coming season. I think that there is a 0% chance that he'll repeat last year because Edge is in town...and because Warner (Leinart) should be better than McCown/Warner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gahs7 Posted June 9, 2006 Author Share Posted June 9, 2006 While kickers are big scorers, you need to ask yourself whether Rackers will be a big scorer this coming season. I think that there is a 0% chance that he'll repeat last year because Edge is in town...and because Warner (Leinart) should be better than McCown/Warner. true, they will be better but there line sucks still and they will be in shootouts again, at least 2 fg's a game anthing over 30 is 5pts, 40 is 7pts and 50 is 10, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Men In Tights Posted June 9, 2006 Share Posted June 9, 2006 true, they will be better but there line sucks still and they will be in shootouts again, at least 2 fg's a game anthing over 30 is 5pts, 40 is 7pts and 50 is 10, What is your full scoring? That is putting way too much of an emphasis on PK's IMHO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.