MikesVikes Posted July 9, 2010 Share Posted July 9, 2010 BRISTOL, Conn. - Jeremy Green, an analyst for ESPN and son of former NFL coach Dennis Green, has been arrested on a child pornography charge in Connecticut. Bristol police say Green was picked up on Thursday around 5 p.m. in a Southington hotel and charged with possession of child pornography, possession of narcotics and possession of drug paraphernalia. He was being held on a $750,000 bond. Police are not releasing details and say the warrant is sealed. There was no telephone listing for Green at his address in Bristol, and it was not immediately clear whether he had a lawyer. ESPN spokesman Mike Soltys says Green has worked since 2005 as a contributor to ESPN.com. The company had no immediate comment on the arrest. link Possession of Narcotics? He must also be taking the high road just like his Dad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Double Agent Posted July 9, 2010 Share Posted July 9, 2010 $750,000 bond? They are not messing around with this stuff. I personally know of a family whose adult son downloaded some pictures he shouldn't have. He didn't distribute. Apparently it was a fake website set up by the feds. I think there were a total of 5 pictures. He got 7 years in prison. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keggerz Posted July 9, 2010 Share Posted July 9, 2010 (edited) $750,000 bond? They are not messing around with this stuff. I personally know of a family whose adult son downloaded some pictures he shouldn't have. He didn't distribute. Apparently it was a fake website set up by the feds. I think there were a total of 5 pictures. He got 7 years in prison. not defending anyone because it is sick and they deserve what they get but I have to ask...how is that not entrapment? Edited July 9, 2010 by keggerz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursa Majoris Posted July 9, 2010 Share Posted July 9, 2010 not defending anyone because it is sick and they deserve what they get but I have to ask...how is that not entrapment? Because if he hadn't used that site, he'd have used another. It isn't entrapment, it's similar to a honeypot to draw hackers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
borge007 Posted July 9, 2010 Share Posted July 9, 2010 (edited) He isn't who I thought he was! Edited July 9, 2010 by borge007 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whomper Posted July 9, 2010 Share Posted July 9, 2010 We better delete that Miley Cyrus thread Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonkis Posted July 9, 2010 Share Posted July 9, 2010 We better delete that Miley Cyrus thread Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scooby's Hubby Posted July 10, 2010 Share Posted July 10, 2010 We better delete that Miley Cyrus thread lmao ... no joke! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackass Posted July 10, 2010 Share Posted July 10, 2010 $750,000 bond? They are not messing around with this stuff. I personally know of a family whose adult son downloaded some pictures he shouldn't have. He didn't distribute. Apparently it was a fake website set up by the feds. I think there were a total of 5 pictures. He got 7 years in prison. Are you sure that's what happened or is that the story the family was tellling? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Double Agent Posted July 11, 2010 Share Posted July 11, 2010 Are you sure that's what happened or is that the story the family was tellling? I've thought about this a lot. Don't know for sure. While normally a family would have a reason to hide the truth...in this situation there's no reason to lie. So I just don't know for sure. But it does seem to be an excessive penalty. Regardless...the Feds are not messing around with this stuff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackass Posted July 11, 2010 Share Posted July 11, 2010 I've thought about this a lot. Don't know for sure. While normally a family would have a reason to hide the truth...in this situation there's no reason to lie. So I just don't know for sure. But it does seem to be an excessive penalty. Regardless...the Feds are not messing around with this stuff. Actually there is a reason to lie. They're making his crime seem somewhat harmless "downloading a few pictures" when it's very possible he was involved in things much more disturbing and illegal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Double Agent Posted July 11, 2010 Share Posted July 11, 2010 Actually there is a reason to lie. They're making his crime seem somewhat harmless "downloading a few pictures" when it's very possible he was involved in things much more disturbing and illegal. Can't give details but in this situation there's not a reason to lie. But I hear what you're saying and the thought has crossed my mind a lot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.