delfamdelfam Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 Team A: Trades Ezekial Elliot to Team B: for Tom Brady Team A: QB: Bortles, Fitzpatrick RB: Hyde, Elliot, Sproles, Ajayi, Whittaker Team B: QB: Brady, Rodgers RB: Blount, McKinnon, Powell Seems like a terrible trade, but the thing is Team A initiated the trade. Team A has two good RB's but nothing after that, and Bortles is just as good as Brady fantasy wise, though he's on a bye. Team B doesn't need Brady and has horrible RB's so it helps him a lot. Seems like a Veto as Team B gets a lot better and Team A gets a lot worse, but Team A initiated the trade so not sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Briggssteel Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 Don't veto it. If he wants to make that trade, let him. I personally wouldn't make that trade, but it's not something obvious like he's stacking the other team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turbinator Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 Team A is stupid but I wouldn't veto unless there is something shady going on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mojo chiefs Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 Team A must be a Patriots fan and going with his heart. Usually not the thing to do in FFL but not worth over ruling. http://forums.thehuddle.com/index.php?/topic/471528-5-players-on-bye-week-help-any-patriot-homers-out-there/#entry4266464 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milton Posted October 5, 2016 Share Posted October 5, 2016 Should never veto unless it's obvious cheating. Let people manage their own teams. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tebby Posted October 6, 2016 Share Posted October 6, 2016 No ofc not......... sigh... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tebby Posted October 6, 2016 Share Posted October 6, 2016 Not to mention how wrong you are with your Bortles vs Brady comparison. And this coming from someone who places almost 0 value on QB's Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1fastdoc Posted October 6, 2016 Share Posted October 6, 2016 Not to mention how wrong you are with your Bortles vs Brady comparison. And this coming from someone who places almost 0 value on QB's Knee jerk reaction is to agree but they're really not that far apart. Bortles just makes all his points in garbage time. But he makes the points. I wouldn't veto unless it was obvious cheating, which it doesn't appear to be Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerlane Posted October 6, 2016 Share Posted October 6, 2016 Nothing wrong with the trade. Brady is a huge upgrade over Bortles and Fitz. You may not agree that it's a great trade, but certainly not veto worthy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shorttynaz Posted October 6, 2016 Share Posted October 6, 2016 (edited) Why would you veto it? That's pretty damn fair if u ask me (player for player) even though Team B is stacking his team. Edited October 6, 2016 by Shorttynaz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikexchoi Posted October 6, 2016 Share Posted October 6, 2016 Team B totally wins out but you can't veto that. It sucks cuz you know that'll make it harder for you this season but there are just stupid people in the league sometimes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.