Hugh 0ne Posted September 25, 2006 Author Share Posted September 25, 2006 good battle today. Your O has a long way to go. So does the Bears. Yep. Very true. And as improved as our defense is, it's not as good as Chicago's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rattsass Posted September 25, 2006 Share Posted September 25, 2006 Bassturd. Don't worry, the wound should heal in 3 or 4 days. Being a Chiefs fan, I'm pretty insensitive to others pain right about now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gilthorp Posted September 25, 2006 Share Posted September 25, 2006 Being a Chiefs fan, I'm pretty insensitive to others pain right about now. So, you basically don't give a rats ass about his pain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh 0ne Posted September 25, 2006 Author Share Posted September 25, 2006 Being a Chiefs fan, I'm pretty insensitive to others pain right about now. You guys looked good today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rattsass Posted September 25, 2006 Share Posted September 25, 2006 You guys looked good today. Yeah, we won't top that one............ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted September 25, 2006 Share Posted September 25, 2006 Well, with the situation he's in this year, and the way he's looked so far, do you think he'll finish better than Hass, Delhomme, Eli, Pennington, Warner, Brees, Favre, Palmer, Bledsoe? On a case-by-case basis: - Hass - do you think Sea's run game will struggle like this ALL year? If it does, Hass can certainly pick up the slack; however, I doubt it will, so he probably ends up at his standard 3500-25 - solid #s - Delhomme - I think his #s pretty much stabilized at 3500-25 last year; with Foster appearing healthy, no reason that should change - Eli - not a believer yet; if he keeps completing his passes at 65%+, he probably finishes better than Brady - Pennington/Warner - they COULD be better than Brady; do you want to hang your hopes on these guys making it an entire season? I thought not. - Brees - another guy in the 3500-25 range; but if the run game clicks with McAllister and Bush, those numbers dip. - Favre - impressive so far; probably a notch above Brady, especially since he has decent WRs and no defense - Palmer - most likely behind only Manning - Bledsoe - I'd think as the new WRs (Caldwell, Gabriel) get on the same page, Brady's #s go up a smidge. Probably he'll be in the same neighborhood as Delhomme, Brees, and Hass, below Palmer, Favre :eek: , and Eli. And Peyton, of course. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scare Tactics Posted September 25, 2006 Share Posted September 25, 2006 Id guess he finishes around 8-12, there are alot of bad QB's out there, it doesnt take a ton of stats to finish 8th Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh 0ne Posted September 25, 2006 Author Share Posted September 25, 2006 I'd be willing to bet that Bledsoe finishes with better fantasy numbers than Brady. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted September 25, 2006 Share Posted September 25, 2006 I'd be willing to bet that Bledsoe finishes with better fantasy numbers than Brady. In standard perf? And what would you be willing to bet? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh 0ne Posted September 25, 2006 Author Share Posted September 25, 2006 In standard perf? And what would you be willing to bet? Peformance scoring. But nothing outlandish. I think we should wager beer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Country Posted September 25, 2006 Share Posted September 25, 2006 On a case-by-case basis: - Hass - do you think Sea's run game will struggle like this ALL year? If it does, Hass can certainly pick up the slack; however, I doubt it will, so he probably ends up at his standard 3500-25 - solid #s - Delhomme - I think his #s pretty much stabilized at 3500-25 last year; with Foster appearing healthy, no reason that should change - Eli - not a believer yet; if he keeps completing his passes at 65%+, he probably finishes better than Brady - Pennington/Warner - they COULD be better than Brady; do you want to hang your hopes on these guys making it an entire season? I thought not. - Brees - another guy in the 3500-25 range; but if the run game clicks with McAllister and Bush, those numbers dip. - Favre - impressive so far; probably a notch above Brady, especially since he has decent WRs and no defense - Palmer - most likely behind only Manning - Bledsoe - I'd think as the new WRs (Caldwell, Gabriel) get on the same page, Brady's #s go up a smidge. Probably he'll be in the same neighborhood as Delhomme, Brees, and Hass, below Palmer, Favre :eek: , and Eli. And Peyton, of course. And this bunching of QBs statwise is exactly why it is poor strategy to take one very early in the draft. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted September 25, 2006 Share Posted September 25, 2006 Peformance scoring. But nothing outlandish. I think we should wager beer. Standard perf (to me, that's 4 pts pass td, 6 pts rush/rec td, 20 yds pass=10 yds rush/rec=1 pt), weeks 4-16, gross points (so you aren't whining when Bledsoe goes down for the season). Minus for ints or not? Fair? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted September 25, 2006 Share Posted September 25, 2006 And this bunching of QBs statwise is exactly why it is poor strategy to take one very early in the draft. I rarely, if ever, do so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twiley Posted September 25, 2006 Share Posted September 25, 2006 I'll take those 17.5 pts he's getting me right now anyday. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh 0ne Posted September 25, 2006 Author Share Posted September 25, 2006 Standard perf (to me, that's 4 pts pass td, 6 pts rush/rec td, 20 yds pass=10 yds rush/rec=1 pt), weeks 4-16, gross points (so you aren't whining when Bledsoe goes down for the season). Minus for ints or not? Fair? I'd like an injury clause. Gotta do a -1 for INT's, even though that will not help me. The rest sounds good to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted September 25, 2006 Share Posted September 25, 2006 I'd like an injury clause. Gotta do a -1 for INT's, even though that will not help me. The rest sounds good to me. Accuse me of hedging, but an injury clause is a deal-breaker. After all, you can't help the club while youre in the tub. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh 0ne Posted September 25, 2006 Author Share Posted September 25, 2006 Accuse me of hedging, but an injury clause is a deal-breaker. After all, you can't help the club while youre in the tub. How about a benching clause? Screw it, let's just make it team QB. We cool. Let's do it. As it is written, so it is done. 12 pack from a local brewery sound good? Or 12 pack of winner's choice? Your call. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted September 25, 2006 Share Posted September 25, 2006 How about a benching clause? Screw it, let's just make it team QB. We cool. Let's do it. As it is written, so it is done. 12 pack from a local brewery sound good? Or 12 pack of winner's choice? Your call. Local brew or winner's choice, don't matter to me - you're in Seattle, right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh 0ne Posted September 25, 2006 Author Share Posted September 25, 2006 Local brew or winner's choice, don't matter to me - you're in Seattle, right? About as far from Seattle as you can get where it still snows. New York momo, NYC suburb. You're in Wisconsin, right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted September 25, 2006 Share Posted September 25, 2006 About as far from Seattle as you can get where it still snows. New York momo, NYC suburb. You're in Wisconsin, right? Yep. Nuts, I was sure you were from Seattle and I was gonna win me some Pike Place Kilt Lifter Scottish Ale. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh 0ne Posted September 25, 2006 Author Share Posted September 25, 2006 Yep. Nuts, I was sure you were from Seattle and I was gonna win me some Pike Place Kilt Lifter Scottish Ale. Hey, if you win, it's your choice. If I can't get it locally, I can put a call into some of my Seattle homies like DGF or Sky or Hugh B Tool, I'm sure I can make it happen. Game on? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Swerski Posted September 25, 2006 Share Posted September 25, 2006 It wouldn't shock me if Brady didn't end up in the Top 10, but I have the feeling that he will. Gabriel and Caldwell still need time to get accustomed to the offense. And if NE's defense keeps playing like this, he's going to rack up garbage-time points like tonight. Yep. Very true. And as improved as our defense is, it's not as good as Chicago's. Yep, but unfortunately neither team looks good enough to win the NFC at this point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted September 25, 2006 Share Posted September 25, 2006 Game on. Just to clarify: Bledsoe vs Brady, gross fantasy pts from weeks 4 through 16. Scoring is 1 pt for every 20 yds passing or 10 yds rushing/rec; 4 pts for a passing td; 6 pts for a rushing td - 2 pt for either a rushing or passing 2 pt conversion? - (-1) for ints. Winner gets a 12er of beer TBD. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh 0ne Posted September 25, 2006 Author Share Posted September 25, 2006 Game on. Just to clarify: Bledsoe vs Brady, gross fantasy pts from weeks 4 through 16. Scoring is 1 pt for every 20 yds passing or 10 yds rushing/rec; 4 pts for a passing td; 6 pts for a rushing td - 2 pt for either a rushing or passing 2 pt conversion? - (-1) for ints. Winner gets a 12er of beer TBD. Yepper. We're on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menudo Posted September 25, 2006 Share Posted September 25, 2006 I dont see NE even makin the playoffs this year with that o'line and lack of receiving corps. Their running game can only take them so far but not far enough O.K. then, who wins the AFC East ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.