Geo33 Posted December 12, 2012 Share Posted December 12, 2012 I will plug David Wilson in my flex spot and not look back. As a Giants homer I would hope Bradshaws is okay, but man would it be nice to see Wilson get the start. Thoughts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theeohiostate Posted December 12, 2012 Share Posted December 12, 2012 very bold call Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loaf Posted December 12, 2012 Share Posted December 12, 2012 It would be nice but he'll play just enough to kill Wilson's value. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
detlef Posted December 12, 2012 Share Posted December 12, 2012 Damn, with him out, that leaves me with 2 out of my 5 RBs in the Huddle draft-only league. Already lost Willis McG and Donald Brown. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
biomaxdds Posted December 12, 2012 Share Posted December 12, 2012 I wouldn't be surprised if Wilson fumbles early and goes back to the dog house. BUT, i think he has really high potentials this week if Bradshaw is out Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dope man Posted December 12, 2012 Share Posted December 12, 2012 very bold call +1 Hey, I was thinking of going with Adrian Peterson to, seems like a good matchup... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whomper Posted December 12, 2012 Share Posted December 12, 2012 Bradshaw is a hugh vagina. I hope he gets rickets Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geo33 Posted December 12, 2012 Author Share Posted December 12, 2012 very bold call +1 Hey, I was thinking of going with Adrian Peterson to, seems like a good matchup... You know you guys actually both sound retarded, right? It would be the kids first career start so yes it would be a bold move by trusting him in the playoffs. Ever consider that I have other decent flex options? How old are you guys seriously? I was simply trying to get a conversation going here, sorry I'm not as awesome as you two seem to be here on the huddle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorcher Posted December 13, 2012 Share Posted December 13, 2012 I am hoping Bradshaw plays, my opponent has Wilson. I think Wilson would have a nice game if Bradshaw is out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dope man Posted December 13, 2012 Share Posted December 13, 2012 You know you guys actually both sound retarded, right? It would be the kids first career start so yes it would be a bold move by trusting him in the playoffs. Ever consider that I have other decent flex options? How old are you guys seriously? I was simply trying to get a conversation going here, sorry I'm not as awesome as you two seem to be here on the huddle. There is no crying in the huddle.....the question is how could you bench him if Bradshaw is out? Week 14 was the first real opportunity that Coughlin gave him since a fumble early in week 1 and he did everything that was expected of him since the preseason and more. Who do you have that you want to start over him as a flex in week 15? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geo33 Posted December 13, 2012 Author Share Posted December 13, 2012 Don't worry buddy I'm not crying, I was just pointing out that you dont sound very intelligent. Yes he played great against the Saints but the Falcons have a better defense. I have Danario Alexander or Ryan Matthews as other options. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dope man Posted December 13, 2012 Share Posted December 13, 2012 Don't worry buddy I'm not crying, I was just pointing out that you dont sound very intelligent. Yes he played great against the Saints but the Falcons have a better defense. I have Danario Alexander or Ryan Matthews as other options. The falcons are the 23rd ranked rushing defense..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geo33 Posted December 13, 2012 Author Share Posted December 13, 2012 And the Saints? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dope man Posted December 13, 2012 Share Posted December 13, 2012 And the Saints? My point is he has a great matchup, the falcons don't stop the run well....you don't agree? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
e5volcano Posted December 13, 2012 Share Posted December 13, 2012 The falcons arent good against runners who get out on the edges, haven't seen Wilson so not sure if hes that type of runner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildTurkey Posted December 13, 2012 Share Posted December 13, 2012 depends on who else you got and whether you want to roll the dice. If Bradshaw's declared out the decision is 10000x easier, but again it would depend on who you're benching. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dope man Posted December 13, 2012 Share Posted December 13, 2012 I'm a gambler and I couldn't take it if he had another big week and I had him on my bench again....stuff like that can get you on suicide watch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superbowlner Posted December 13, 2012 Share Posted December 13, 2012 (edited) This decision isn't as easy as you guys all make it sound to be. My current starters: Alfred Morris Steven Ridley Flex: Demarco Murray Bench: David Wilson. Who exactly would you guys bench for Wilson? My option is to bench Ridley just becasue he's facing the 49ers D. However, he's been clutch for me all season. Edited December 13, 2012 by Superbowlner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkhorse1251 Posted December 13, 2012 Share Posted December 13, 2012 This decision isn't as easy as you guys all make it sound to be. My current starters: Alfred Morris Steven Ridley Flex: Demarco Murray Bench: David Wilson. Who exactly would you guys bench for Wilson? My option is to bench Ridley just becasue he's facing the 49ers D. However, he's been clutch for me all season. I think you answered your own question. Ridley won't get much done. Maybe as a committee, the Pats may be effective, but I don't see any 1 back on the Pats that can gash them. I would start Wilson over him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wpayers Posted December 13, 2012 Share Posted December 13, 2012 As an expectant Wilson owner I share the following: Just posted on Rotoworld, "Paul Schwartz of the New York Post is betting that (Bradshaw) doesn't even make the trip." http://www.rotoworld.com/headlines/nfl/251138/nicks-returns-to-practice-bradshaw-still-out Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikesVikes Posted December 13, 2012 Share Posted December 13, 2012 You know you guys actually both sound retarded, right? It would be the kids first career start so yes it would be a bold move by trusting him in the playoffs. Ever consider that I have other decent flex options? How old are you guys seriously? I was simply trying to get a conversation going here, sorry I'm not as awesome as you two seem to be here on the huddle. Retarded? I'm guessing that they are older than you are. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whiskey Pimp Posted December 13, 2012 Share Posted December 13, 2012 You know you guys actually both sound retarded, right? It would be the kids first career start so yes it would be a bold move by trusting him in the playoffs. Ever consider that I have other decent flex options? How old are you guys seriously? I was simply trying to get a conversation going here, sorry I'm not as awesome as you two seem to be here on the huddle. How is starting a player that broke out last week when finally given some carries and would have no one to really have to share carries with this week a bold move? The only way it's bold is if you're starting him over a stud that is also not sharing carries with anyone and has more of a history than Wilson does but that's about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geo33 Posted December 13, 2012 Author Share Posted December 13, 2012 How is starting a player that broke out last week when finally given some carries and would have no one to really have to share carries with this week a bold move? The only way it's bold is if you're starting him over a stud that is also not sharing carries with anyone and has more of a history than Wilson does but that's about it. When did I say it was a bold move? I was simply trying to start a damn conversation and everyone attacks me about it. You probably decided to comment because you're a bitter Pats fan. Sorry we whooped you in the Superbowl twice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whiskey Pimp Posted December 13, 2012 Share Posted December 13, 2012 When did I say it was a bold move? I was simply trying to start a damn conversation and everyone attacks me about it. You probably decided to comment because you're a bitter Pats fan. Sorry we whooped you in the Superbowl twice. You know you guys actually both sound retarded, right? It would be the kids first career start so yes it would be a bold move by trusting him in the playoffs. Ever consider that I have other decent flex options? How old are you guys seriously? I was simply trying to get a conversation going here, sorry I'm not as awesome as you two seem to be here on the huddle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geo33 Posted December 13, 2012 Author Share Posted December 13, 2012 You're right. After the debate started I did say that, my mistake. I'm just stuck between him and Danario, that is all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.