Liverlips Posted February 1, 2005 Share Posted February 1, 2005 Over under on his rushing total is around 30 yards. He has longed to be known as a pocket passer. But when playing for all the marbles he will do anything to win. With all the other options on offense, I see him running more than usual. And in the process sending the "dynasty" and the next Joe Montana home with didilly poo. Win or lose though, Donovan will rush for atleast 50 yards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin3 Posted February 1, 2005 Share Posted February 1, 2005 Thanks for the heads-up, I hadn't reviewed all the prop bets yet, and that's a lock if I've ever seen one. My book's at 29.5... run McPimp, RUN! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Men In Tights Posted February 1, 2005 Share Posted February 1, 2005 I am not sure of this "lock" status you both see. NE knows McNabb can scramble and I am sure BB will have at least one D-player spying him. I just get a little antsy when I hear the word "lock" since there isn't such a thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin3 Posted February 1, 2005 Share Posted February 1, 2005 I am not sure of this "lock" status you both see. NE knows McNabb can scramble and I am sure BB will have at least one D-player spying him. I just get a little antsy when I hear the word "lock" since there isn't such a thing. 681011[/snapback] OK, as close to a lock as you can get. DMD's got him at going for 40. Plus, if the Pats spy McNabb, who's gonna spy Westbrook? Chicken. Egg. Egg. Chicken. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liverlips Posted February 1, 2005 Author Share Posted February 1, 2005 (edited) OK, as close to a lock as you can get. DMD's got him at going for 40. Plus, if the Pats spy McNabb, who's gonna spy Westbrook? Chicken. Egg. Egg. Chicken. 681039[/snapback] Exactly. one player can spy McNabb, but its gonna take two to take him down. Too many weapons, especially if T.O. plays. McNabb could get 5-20 yds.every passing down if the recievers are covered down field. Edited February 1, 2005 by Liverlips Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LegFuJohnson Posted February 7, 2005 Share Posted February 7, 2005 Hope you made a lot on that one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigdadreed Posted February 7, 2005 Share Posted February 7, 2005 It was close, though - only missed by 40 yards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin3 Posted February 7, 2005 Share Posted February 7, 2005 It was close, though - only missed by 40 yards. 687133[/snapback] Didn't hear anyone disagreeing before it actually happened. I love it when you morons came out of the woodwork to say "told ya so".... when you told us, let's see... NOTHING. Idiots. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crispirons Posted February 7, 2005 Share Posted February 7, 2005 a friend of mine won a nice chunk of change betting on l.j. smith scoring the first t.d. i had a nice day myself winning by betting on both teams teased with the under. took the kids at work for some cash too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackshi17 Posted February 7, 2005 Share Posted February 7, 2005 I was talking after the game to my grandaughter (a Philly fan) and she called McNabb a "cookie" in that he crumbles under pressure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin3 Posted February 7, 2005 Share Posted February 7, 2005 a friend of mine won a nice chunk of change betting on l.j. smith scoring the first t.d. i had a nice day myself winning by betting on both teams teased with the under. took the kids at work for some cash too. 687371[/snapback] I had a feeling about the TE position, unfortunately put the $ on the opposing team's. 30-1 on Fauria was too good to pass up... but shoulda put $ on Smith, too, seeing that he was 18-1. Sweet win! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Men In Tights Posted February 7, 2005 Share Posted February 7, 2005 I am not sure of this "lock" status you both see. NE knows McNabb can scramble and I am sure BB will have at least one D-player spying him. I just get a little antsy when I hear the word "lock" since there isn't such a thing. 681011[/snapback] Hey Darin you A$$ Clown, take a look at what I wrote before the Super Bowl saying this wasn't a lock. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
juanruiz13 Posted February 7, 2005 Share Posted February 7, 2005 a friend of mine won a nice chunk of change betting on l.j. smith scoring the first t.d. i had a nice day myself winning by betting on both teams teased with the under. took the kids at work for some cash too. 687371[/snapback] Same here...my friend won some good money on LJ Smith. He actually played some street ball against him in college, and LJ wrecked him. I guess he figured McNabb tossing him a jumpball. It was actually a very nice pass from McNabb for the TD. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigdadreed Posted February 7, 2005 Share Posted February 7, 2005 Didn't hear anyone disagreeing before it actually happened. I love it when you morons came out of the woodwork to say "told ya so".... when you told us, let's see... NOTHING. Idiots. 687274[/snapback] Chill out, Darin. If you weren't an Illini fan, I would have gone harder. You must admit the fact that he had ZERO yards rushing opened you up to some razzing! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liverlips Posted February 7, 2005 Author Share Posted February 7, 2005 taking the actual loss harder than losing my prop bet. They schemed him real well. I love how cyber nerds can be so tough in here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackass Posted February 7, 2005 Share Posted February 7, 2005 Hey, if you don't want the razzing, don't post your bets. Or at least don't say it's a LOCK in capital letters. You were wrong, accept it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSab Posted February 7, 2005 Share Posted February 7, 2005 Hey, if you don't want the razzing, don't post your bets. Or at least don't say it's a LOCK in capital letters. You were wrong, accept it. 687978[/snapback] Why are you talking to yourself Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackass Posted February 7, 2005 Share Posted February 7, 2005 Why are you talking to yourself 688149[/snapback] Why is that funny? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexgaddis Posted February 7, 2005 Share Posted February 7, 2005 Gotta agree dude, this aint an "I told you so" but a "boy you couldn't have been more wrong on your LOCK"... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSab Posted February 7, 2005 Share Posted February 7, 2005 (edited) Why is that funny? 688173[/snapback] Dcon has a split personality Actually, Dan=Dcon=Jackass=Liverlips, maybe several Edited February 7, 2005 by NSab Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin3 Posted February 7, 2005 Share Posted February 7, 2005 Chill out, Darin. If you weren't an Illini fan, I would have gone harder. You must admit the fact that he had ZERO yards rushing opened you up to some razzing! 687824[/snapback] So you're saying the oddsmakers are morons, too? How about DMD, who projected 40 yards from McQB? Moron, too? Bottom line, fools like you that come on here and "razz" when you said NOTHING about it before it actually happened are a dime a dozen and I couldn't care less about what you twits say. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigdadreed Posted February 7, 2005 Share Posted February 7, 2005 So you're saying the oddsmakers are morons, too? How about DMD, who projected 40 yards from McQB? Moron, too? Bottom line, fools like you that come on here and "razz" when you said NOTHING about it before it actually happened are a dime a dozen and I couldn't care less about what you twits say. 688246[/snapback] Hey Mr. Triple Espresso - No one is saying that it was a dumb bet. I'm just saying that you hung your ass out in public touting your propostion bet & it ended up losing by an extreme margin. I have been known to make a bet or two (or two thousand) over the years & have experienced all sides of the story. The fact of the matter is that you touted this particular bet on these boards & on your over 40 yard bet, your guy got ZERO freakin' yards! How could you not expect some good-natured abuse! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin3 Posted February 7, 2005 Share Posted February 7, 2005 Hey Mr. Triple Espresso - No one is saying that it was a dumb bet. I'm just saying that you hung your ass out in public touting your propostion bet & it ended up losing by an extreme margin. I have been known to make a bet or two (or two thousand) over the years & have experienced all sides of the story. The fact of the matter is that you touted this particular bet on these boards & on your over 40 yard bet, your guy got ZERO freakin' yards! How could you not expect some good-natured abuse! 688301[/snapback] Mr. Wine Cooler, Easy on the sugar intake, fella. First off, I didn't start the thread. Secondly, I didn't say it was a lock. Thirdly, no abuse is ever "good natured". Perhaps if you were on these boards saying "dude, that's a horrible bet"... or even "hmm, I don't know about that one", you'd have some credibility. But since you and your fellow "razzers" were nowhere to be found, it's all nothing but idle chatter as far as I'm concerned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigdadreed Posted February 7, 2005 Share Posted February 7, 2005 Thirdly, no abuse is ever "good natured". 688316[/snapback] You must hang out with a different set of guys than I do then. Feel free to fire back your attempted witty comeback now, but I'm done. I have to get back to work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pedroz13 Posted February 7, 2005 Share Posted February 7, 2005 Mr. Wine Cooler, Easy on the sugar intake, fella. First off, I didn't start the thread. Secondly, I didn't say it was a lock. Thirdly, no abuse is ever "good natured". Perhaps if you were on these boards saying "dude, that's a horrible bet"... or even "hmm, I don't know about that one", you'd have some credibility. But since you and your fellow "razzers" were nowhere to be found, it's all nothing but idle chatter as far as I'm concerned. 688316[/snapback] Sorry Darin , gotta call you out on that one : "Thanks for the heads-up, I hadn't reviewed all the prop bets yet, and that's a lock if I've ever seen one. My book's at 29.5... run McPimp, RUN! " Looks like you DID say it was a lock. I admit I was tempted to take this prop too. I expected a solid rushing effort from McNabb. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.