Nanas4football Posted August 31, 2016 Share Posted August 31, 2016 Main guys are Ant Brown and Golden Tate. I drafted Wallace, but Funchess is a free agent and is picking up steam. Any thoughts? Team and details in Signature. Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anismith Posted August 31, 2016 Share Posted August 31, 2016 I like me some Funchess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanas4football Posted August 31, 2016 Author Share Posted August 31, 2016 Is it a no brainer or pretty close? Flacco throws a pretty deep ball and Wallace likes that. Fun is a giant and has Cam, but Benj and Olsen to share with. Not sure if these guys are number 2 or 3 in depth chart Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tdybaz Posted August 31, 2016 Share Posted August 31, 2016 Have heard Funchess has looked really good in camp, better than Benjamin. I'd go with him and his chances at his youth and opportunity than Wallace at this point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anismith Posted August 31, 2016 Share Posted August 31, 2016 Is it a no brainer or pretty close? Flacco throws a pretty deep ball and Wallace likes that. Fun is a giant and has Cam, but Benj and Olsen to share with. Not sure if these guys are number 2 or 3 in depth chart It's similar in B-more no? You have Steve Smith and Aiken there too? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanas4football Posted August 31, 2016 Author Share Posted August 31, 2016 Last widget. I have Delanie Walker also. He plays at receiver position. He's better than Wallace also? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HHM Posted August 31, 2016 Share Posted August 31, 2016 I would go for Funchess as well. I have heard good things from camp about him. I have heard good things about Wallace as well, but I don't think he will have any consistency. Probably will get a few long touchdowns during the year and maybe win you a week or two, but I think he will be hit or miss at best. I think Walker will also produce more consistently than Wallace. IMO go with Funchess and Walker. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gballi15 Posted August 31, 2016 Share Posted August 31, 2016 Walker will do better than Wallace. And I am not one to usually say this, but I like Wallace this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanas4football Posted September 1, 2016 Author Share Posted September 1, 2016 Last thoughts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irish Posted September 1, 2016 Share Posted September 1, 2016 Definitely Funchess and even Walker. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AoDay Posted September 1, 2016 Share Posted September 1, 2016 I would probably go Wallace. Wallace will bring back the deep threat which is where Flacco excels. There isn't really anyone else that can stretch the field as SSS is 37 coming off a torn achilles, and Perriman has been plagued with knee injuries. Aiken is a multipurpose receiver playing both outside and out of the slot and I expect him and SSS to fill similar roles. The BAL run game has been pretty poor of late, and the addition of West is making it a full blown committee. Lacy and Martin are already your 2 RB starters. Antonio and Tate/J Brown are all a better weekly pick than either Wallace or Funchess. Then at Flex you will probably decide between Tate/J Brown/ L. Murray. You don't really need the depth, so I would rather take the higher upside of Wallace than Funchess who will have to contest with a lot more mouths to feed in CAR. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robotpimp Posted September 1, 2016 Share Posted September 1, 2016 Funchess bigger upside. Wallace has a low ceiling on a team that is waiting for Smith Sr. Perriman to return and Aiken already has a spot Wallace most likely will be the odd man out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Montana is da Man Posted September 1, 2016 Share Posted September 1, 2016 Wallace could be a few week flier. Funchess, barring injury, will be there all season. Wallace may catch a few bombs from Flacco, but his ceiling is much lower than Funchess. I'd go with Funchess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ffgreg Posted September 1, 2016 Share Posted September 1, 2016 Funchess has upside Wallace is cooked. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanas4football Posted September 2, 2016 Author Share Posted September 2, 2016 Hmm. Still haven't pulled the trigger.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReturnToSender Posted September 2, 2016 Share Posted September 2, 2016 I think Bunches of Funchess offers way more upside and will compete all year for the number 1 spot while Kelvin gets back to football shape and game speed. Baltimore is crowded with WR 3s, and that's what Wallace is. http://forums.thehuddle.com/index.php?/topic/466116-strange-ppr-draft/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anismith Posted September 2, 2016 Share Posted September 2, 2016 This is silly. Funchess is way better. You are getting almost unanimous opinions on this... and still havn't pulled the trigger. Why ask then? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanas4football Posted September 2, 2016 Author Share Posted September 2, 2016 This is silly. Funchess is way better. You are getting almost unanimous opinions on this... and still havn't pulled the trigger. Why ask then? Thanks for the slap! Done. Lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anismith Posted September 2, 2016 Share Posted September 2, 2016 Thanks for the slap! Done. Lol Cool man! I felt harsh posting that. I've been there with indecision. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BradleyM Posted September 2, 2016 Share Posted September 2, 2016 funchess hit me back at http://forums.thehuddle.com/index.php?/topic/466144-brees-and-yeldon-for-cobb/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.