jknyc Posted December 18, 2005 Share Posted December 18, 2005 Guys, I just checked the weather forecast for JAX tomorrow and there is a 50% chance of thunderstorms. Knowing this, would you start Garrard over Hass. It's supposed to be cloudy in TENN tomorrow but no rain. Other things to consider is that my opponent is starting Greg Jones and I am starting Engram in my flex. Any opinions? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Go Skins Posted December 18, 2005 Share Posted December 18, 2005 I would stick with Hasslebeck. He's got 3 WR's he likes to throw to, and IMO Garrard is too risky. Sure, he COULD do well, but Hass is safer... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoopzfanatic Posted December 18, 2005 Share Posted December 18, 2005 I would still go with Garrard. He has a tremendous match up and is a great running QB so he can always vulture a TD that way too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 18, 2005 Share Posted December 18, 2005 Hass is the safe play, but if you want to gamble Garrard could be huge. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildbluefan Posted December 18, 2005 Share Posted December 18, 2005 What would you do, if you had these 2 QBs , and were down 35 (thanks to Larry freekin JOhnson !) ?????Should I roll with GARRARD now ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cre8tiff Posted December 18, 2005 Share Posted December 18, 2005 What would you do, if you had these 2 QBs , and were down 35 (thanks to Larry freekin JOhnson !) ?????Should I roll with GARRARD now ? 1222840[/snapback] Time to gamble Wild Blue. Garrard. I'm playing him over Bledsoe... :pray: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpie Posted December 18, 2005 Share Posted December 18, 2005 I wouldn't even think about benching Hasselback in this matchup. He has just as good a chance to get large as Garrard and has been fairly consistant all year. You're not going to make it all up on one player so go with the one that should get the most points. I'm starting Garrard but I have no other choice. How is Hasselback not on fire after last week. Garrard did okay mostly late however. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newarknugget Posted December 18, 2005 Share Posted December 18, 2005 thats pretty wild that you can change your lineup after this weeks games have started Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jknyc Posted December 18, 2005 Author Share Posted December 18, 2005 FYI...it's raining in JAX right now. I think I'm going with Hass over Garrard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toolman Posted December 19, 2005 Share Posted December 19, 2005 thats pretty wild that you can change your lineup after this weeks games have started 1222924[/snapback] We can still change our players in our league. But only if theres a thur or sat game and then if you start one of those players in the early games you cant change them out after that. So on sun we can still make changes to our sun/mon night players up until 5 mins before game time. Also hope you went with Hassleback I had the choice of Delhomme or Garrard I went with Garrard but there was only a few points difference between them and when I had Tiki and L Johnson going on Sat Im on my way to our Superbowl for a chance at back to back Championships!! Good luck all in you playoffs (except my opponent next week) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmac Posted December 19, 2005 Share Posted December 19, 2005 Sure wish that I had stuck with Hass over Garrard. Cost me a trip to our Super Bowl. Jax has no business making the playoffs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildbluefan Posted December 19, 2005 Share Posted December 19, 2005 Sure wish that I had stuck with Hass over Garrard. Cost me a trip to our Super Bowl. Jax has no business making the playoffs. 1225235[/snapback] Ouch ! Luckily I put Hass back in , would've won with either anyway (thanks to Cris Cooley !) ! :doah: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.