Doc Holliday Posted January 20, 2006 Share Posted January 20, 2006 Edwards does not have the emotional loyalty that Vermeil felt towards Holmes. I see a big dose of Larry Johnson next year. He's top three easy, especially with Solari the OC now. The big question is how long LJ will hold out, because you know that's coming. 1276761[/snapback] How about Roaf and Shields? any talk of what is up with them chief? IMO if they are back I don't care who runs behind that line..I want them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Dick Posted January 20, 2006 Share Posted January 20, 2006 How about Roaf and Shields? any talk of what is up with them chief? IMO if they are back I don't care who runs behind that line..I want them. 1276868[/snapback] Roaf seems to be coming back for sure. Not sure yet about Shields. We honestly won't know about him until summer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Holliday Posted January 20, 2006 Share Posted January 20, 2006 Roaf seems to be coming back for sure. Not sure yet about Shields. We honestly won't know about him until summer. 1276888[/snapback] Much appreciate it Chief. I will be watching this situation closely. If Shields leaves I won't be drafting LJ 1st overall(if I even get the 1st pick that is ). If they all come back though I beieve he is the number 1 pick hands down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caveman_Nick Posted January 20, 2006 Share Posted January 20, 2006 (edited) It appears that you also do not understand the meaning behind leading something off with a 'IMHO' 1276854[/snapback] Oh, puh-leeze. I said that our definitions of historic differed and just defended mine. You can have yours. Just remember that by your definition the guy that comes in second in the rushing title every year is having an historic season Edited January 20, 2006 by Caveman_Nick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DKF Posted January 20, 2006 Share Posted January 20, 2006 Oh, puh-leeze. I said that our definitions of historic differed and just defended mine. You can have yours. Just remember that by your definition the guy that comes in second in the rushing title every year is having an historic season 1277099[/snapback] hence the 'IMHO' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caveman_Nick Posted January 20, 2006 Share Posted January 20, 2006 hence the 'IMHO' 1277465[/snapback] I just said that. Now you're being nonsensical. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DKF Posted January 20, 2006 Share Posted January 20, 2006 : Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.