McBoog Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 (edited) ... H8, you make this too fricking easy. You believe EVERYTHING you read on right-wing sites, and post it here without reading it all the way to the bottom, when even they admit it's nonsense. Ummmm, where is it that they "admit" this! In the comments from readers section?? This has been posted all over the net. We ask you and all those whose names are associated with IPCC policy to accept the scientific observations and renounce current IPCC policy. Yours sincerely, Hans Schreuder, Analytical Chemist, mMensa, hans@tech-know.eu Piers Corbyn, Astrophysicist UK, Dir. WeatherAction.com, piers@weatheraction.com Dr Don Parkes, Prof. Em. Human Ecology, Australia, dnp@networksmm.com.au Svend Hendriksen, Nobel Peace Prize 1988 (shared), Greenland, hendriksen@greennet.gl You didn't read the link, just looked at the top and the bottom. Once again, your lazyness is astounding. I'll take the Mensa over the Gore Nobel ANY day. (But then, you woulndn't "get" that either. None are American oil barrons either ) Interesting how you and your board bully buds think all that is needed is an insult or as label to refute a point. Good point! DId you read the response letter from the IPCC to this letter the many errors and retractions they will be making in their orininal assessmanrs? Nope. Didn't think so. You aare too lazy to research this your self and too close minded to try for me to go it for you. Was a good read though, but clearly over your head. Actually, I should just keep this short for you since it bothers me so much and go with the standard.... Rude and uninformed. Buh-bye. Edited April 16, 2008 by McBoog Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AtomicCEO Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 Ummmm, where is it that they "admit" this! In the comments from readers section?? Hey cokdik... maybe try searching for the text I put in quotes. It's not in the comments, it's in the article. And I don't care how many other alleged scientists you attach to it, when your lead is "Nobel Prize Winner says Global Warming is Hooey", and it ends up to be a lie... you're either reading a piece intended to lie to you, or you're reading a piece from a complete idiot. Either way, this whole article is pwnd. You should have read it before agreeing with H8. Be embarrassed. Rude? Definitley. Your crusade here is ridiculous. Uninformed? Population = you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McBoog Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 Hey cokdik... .... Read no further than that. : I'll just treat your posts now like Bushleague's. Not worth the effort to put on ignore, I'll just skip over them. You now have no reason to ever reply to my posts or open a thread I start. I don't care about anything you have to say. You are... Rude, lazy and uninformed! And not worth any of my time. Buh-bye! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AtomicCEO Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 (edited) Read no further than that. : I'll just treat your posts now like Bushleague's. Not worth the effort to put on ignore, I'll just skip over them. You now have no reason to ever reply to my posts or open a thread I start. I don't care about anything you have to say. You are... Rude, lazy and uninformed! And not worth any of my time. Buh-bye! Thats ok. Everyone else who read it is laughing at you. Look at me, I'm a Nobel Prize Winner! Edited April 16, 2008 by AtomicCEO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piratesownninjas Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 So... Global warming was a farce all along... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushwacked Posted April 16, 2008 Share Posted April 16, 2008 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushwacked Posted April 17, 2008 Share Posted April 17, 2008 The more one is influenced by an intense desire to factiously propagate a preconceived political principal; the louder and less judicious one becomes. = McBoog and H8tank. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H8tank Posted April 17, 2008 Share Posted April 17, 2008 Since there is no 'man made global warming', they are calling it 'man made climate change'. Wow, man made the climate change.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AtomicCEO Posted April 17, 2008 Share Posted April 17, 2008 Wow, man made the climate change.... Crazy concept, huh? Adding millions of tons of pollutants into the air can have an effect, right? Nonsense. Did I mention that I won a Nobel Prize? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H8tank Posted April 24, 2008 Share Posted April 24, 2008 April 24 (Bloomberg) -- Brazil's discoveries of what may be two of the world's three biggest oil finds in the past 30 years could help end the Western Hemisphere's reliance on Middle East crude, Strategic Forecasting Inc. said. Maybe we have more than we thought... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perchoutofwater Posted April 24, 2008 Share Posted April 24, 2008 April 24 (Bloomberg) -- Brazil's discoveries of what may be two of the world's three biggest oil finds in the past 30 years could help end the Western Hemisphere's reliance on Middle East crude, Strategic Forecasting Inc. said. Maybe we have more than we thought... I read in Forbes this month that there is 60 Billion barrels of oil of the cost of the Falkland Islands, of which at least 10% is recoverable. If Argentina and Great Britain can stop squabbling over who owns the islands, that is another western hemisphere oil field that is quite large, to help us get out of the middle east oil markets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.