SuperBalla Posted May 26, 2008 Share Posted May 26, 2008 Just throwing it out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KSUChiefsTarheelFan Posted May 26, 2008 Share Posted May 26, 2008 You forgot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperBalla Posted May 26, 2008 Author Share Posted May 26, 2008 You forgot Who is Ralph Nader? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Beatings Posted May 26, 2008 Share Posted May 26, 2008 I picked Barr only because I won't be voting for any of the other candidates. I probably won't vote for Barr either, but he kind of represents the 3rd party / independent vote that I will be casting in the General Election. Not sure who it will be for me at this point, but it 100% will NOT be McCain, Obama or Clinton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursa Majoris Posted May 26, 2008 Share Posted May 26, 2008 I picked Barr only because I won't be voting for any of the other candidates. I probably won't vote for Barr either, but he kind of represents the 3rd party / independent vote that I will be casting in the General Election. Not sure who it will be for me at this point, but it 100% will NOT be McCain, Obama or Clinton. It may well be no-one then. Third party candidates like Barr and Nader are not on the ballot in every state. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperBalla Posted May 26, 2008 Author Share Posted May 26, 2008 I think it is obvious Puddy is stealing key votes for John. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muck Posted May 26, 2008 Share Posted May 26, 2008 I picked Barr only because I (probably) won't be voting for any of the other candidates. I probably won't vote for Barr either, but he kind of represents the 3rd party / independent vote that I will be (probably) casting in the General Election. Not sure who it will be for me at this point, +1 but it 100% will NOT be McCain, Obama or Clinton. ...not sure about this part, though... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeeR Posted May 26, 2008 Share Posted May 26, 2008 This poll is sort of screwed because the DemOnKraps are having trouble picking a candidate. Just throwing it out there. The only reason it was even mildly interesting for awhile was Rev Wrong's circus antics and Obama's weak handling of it. But he's such a popular and "hip" candidate he couldn't lose this nomination/election if he tried. Which he has. So those against him can cling to their guns and etc all they want; the election is still his. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WaterMan Posted May 26, 2008 Share Posted May 26, 2008 Sorry but I blame Hillary just being a woman messes with the Democrats voting choice. If she was a Republican she wouldn't even be a factor in the polls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmarc117 Posted May 27, 2008 Share Posted May 27, 2008 i dont vote, its a waste of my time to vote for prez while i reside in illinois. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
isleseeya Posted May 27, 2008 Share Posted May 27, 2008 need more time and see who is VP on each ticket ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
isleseeya Posted May 27, 2008 Share Posted May 27, 2008 Sorry but I blame Hillary just being a woman messes with the Democrats voting choice. If she was a Republican she wouldn't even be a factor in the polls. Giants beat pats in the SB and exposed Belichick and Brady Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperBalla Posted May 27, 2008 Author Share Posted May 27, 2008 (edited) You're nothing but an idiot parrot. Once more for your amoebic brain - your Republicans had TOTAL CONTROL of everything for six years from early 2001 through early 2007 yet still you complain about "Demonkraps". Truly you are the primary definition of a Limbaugh moran. I am not complaining about anything that the government has or has not done (except The Katrina disastor/recovery). I am complaining about democrats. I don't know what else I need to say? I don't like pro-abortion, I don't like Governement healthcare, I don't need to be ridiculed for owning guns, I don't need to be ridiculed for attending church and holding my bible in high regards, I don't like High taxes, and I don't like whimps when it comes to foreign policy. That is it. I think Bush W is an idiot but he was better than yer guy. In fact...he would be better than Obama. Simple. Edited May 27, 2008 by SuperBalla Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sugar Magnolia Posted May 27, 2008 Share Posted May 27, 2008 Sorry but I blame Hillary just being a woman messes with the Democrats voting choice. If she was a Republican she wouldn't even be a factor in the polls. Just curiuos, what is your point exactly.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
detlef Posted May 27, 2008 Share Posted May 27, 2008 Just curiuos, what is your point exactly.... I'm going to guess that his point was this: Is it safe to say that there are more women who read Ms. magazine on the left than the right? I would think so. Many of these women, like my wife, had a hard time letting go of what was, to date, the best look a woman had at the White House. I mean, prior to this, nobody got a sniff. Sure Ferraro was a VP running mate but who thought, even for a second that Dukakis was going to win? For some time now, this election has been considered the Dems to win or lose, so Hillary was knocking at the door big time. I got off the Hillary train (well, if I was ever really on it) some time ago, but my wife was still undecided the night before the primary. She basically came right out and said that she was bummed that, yet again, a woman was not going to be the POTUS and that kept her behind Hillary as long as she was. None the less, the facts that she really didn't like what she was doing or becoming and the silly nonsense about the whole running from the plane under fire crap sort of clinched it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WaterMan Posted May 27, 2008 Share Posted May 27, 2008 Just curiuos, what is your point exactly.... Feminists reside in the Democratic party. To have a woman Democrat run, who was also the wife of an all ready President looks like a golden opportunity for many Feminists to really "voice" they opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cre8tiff Posted May 27, 2008 Share Posted May 27, 2008 I'm going to guess that his point was this: Is it safe to say that there are more women who read Ms. magazine on the left than the right? I would think so. Many of these women, like my wife, had a hard time letting go of what was, to date, the best look a woman had at the White House. I mean, prior to this, nobody got a sniff. Sure Ferraro was a VP running mate but who thought, even for a second that Dukakis was going to win? For some time now, this election has been considered the Dems to win or lose, so Hillary was knocking at the door big time. I got off the Hillary train (well, if I was ever really on it) some time ago, but my wife was still undecided the night before the primary. She basically came right out and said that she was bummed that, yet again, a woman was not going to be the POTUS and that kept her behind Hillary as long as she was. None the less, the facts that she really didn't like what she was doing or becoming and the silly nonsense about the whole running from the plane under fire crap sort of clinched it. [bigjohn]Mondale, not Dukakis. Dukakis' running mate was Lloyd Bentsen.[/bigjohn] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
detlef Posted May 27, 2008 Share Posted May 27, 2008 [bigjohn]Mondale, not Dukakis. Dukakis' running mate was Lloyd Bentsen.[/bigjohn] Le oops. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Cid Posted May 27, 2008 Share Posted May 27, 2008 I would cheerfully vote for a Libertarian except that Bob Barr is not a Libertarian. He's a Republican snake that just wanted to toss his hat into the ring. Unfortunately, the Libertarian party in this country is so desperate for publicity that they will latch onto any standing politician in order to try and gain "legitimacy " in the public's eye. It's truly sad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WaterMan Posted May 27, 2008 Share Posted May 27, 2008 I read both his websites and he seems pretty Republican. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SheikYerbuti Posted May 27, 2008 Share Posted May 27, 2008 So far the results should be pretty scary to Balla. . .even if you give McNasty all of the "I want to waste my vote" libertarian votes and ALL of the whompolist constituents, which I'm guessing if forced to a real vote would be somewhere around 50/50, Obama is STILL winning. And that's without Clinton's votes tacked on once the Dems get down to one candidate. If this poll is any gague at all, it's going to be at least 4 years of bleeding hearted, tax-and-spending, hippie-peace-sign liberalism. Getchyo' popcorn ready! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big John Posted May 27, 2008 Share Posted May 27, 2008 So far the results should be pretty scary to Balla. . .even if you give McNasty all of the "I want to waste my vote" libertarian votes and ALL of the whompolist constituents, which I'm guessing if forced to a real vote would be somewhere around 50/50, Obama is STILL winning. And that's without Clinton's votes tacked on once the Dems get down to one candidate. What does this have to do with our resident male nurse? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moneymakers Posted May 27, 2008 Share Posted May 27, 2008 So far the results should be pretty scary to Balla. . .even if you give McNasty all of the "I want to waste my vote" libertarian votes and ALL of the whompolist constituents, which I'm guessing if forced to a real vote would be somewhere around 50/50, Obama is STILL winning. And that's without Clinton's votes tacked on once the Dems get down to one candidate. If this poll is any gague at all, it's going to be at least 4 years of bleeding hearted, tax-and-spending, hippie-peace-sign liberalism. Getchyo' popcorn ready! I was thinking just the opposite. pretty good turn out for McCain. The tailgate has always been very left leaning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SheikYerbuti Posted May 27, 2008 Share Posted May 27, 2008 What does this have to do with our resident male nurse? John McCain III attended a private boarding school, where he was nicknamed "McNasty" for his willingness to fight. Later, at the US Naval Academy, he gained a reputation as a ladies' man, complained that he was picked on by his commanding officer, and graduated 894th out of 899 in his class. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
detlef Posted May 27, 2008 Share Posted May 27, 2008 I was thinking just the opposite. I'm guessing you say that often. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts