Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

No, we don't want our Sheriff's actually upholding the law.


Perchoutofwater
 Share

Recommended Posts

What is the difference between a sobriety checkpoint and illegal immigration check point? Just asking if you are against those.

 

I am. Those places basically reverse the doctrine of innocent until proven guilty. And if they ask to search your vehicle just try saying no. You'll have the wrath of the state descend on you, just for wanting said state to respect your rights.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am. Those places basically reverse the doctrine of innocent until proven guilty. And if they ask to search your vehicle just try saying no. You'll have the wrath of the state descend on you, just for wanting said state to respect your rights.

 

Do you disagree with airport security as well?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Airports are not, and it isn't the people from Delta feeling your wife up. The planes themselves are quasi private at best given the number of bailouts they have received.

 

The last sentence could be argued, but the only reason you're at an airport is to get on the plane. I view the airports as a glorified hwy rest-area. :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last sentence could be argued, but the only reason you're at an airport is to get on the plane. I view the airports as a glorified hwy rest-area. :wacko:

 

So you don't have a problem with them setting up checkpoints at high way rest areas?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you don't have a problem with them setting up checkpoints at high way rest areas?

 

The car is mine, the plane is not. The passenger air companies want the checkpoints because they have customers who otherwise might not take the plane. But I could see the rationale if it's just a gov't rest-stop, not to get off every interstate exit.

 

ETA - look at it this way, would you be OK with cops coming into your house just to "make sure" you don't have anything illegal? Then taking and running the serial #'s on every one of your guns, just to "make sure" none have been used for anything. Nevermind that the serials will be public record, commrade, we're doing this for your own good.

Edited by westvirginia
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The car is mine, the plane is not. The passenger air companies want the checkpoints because they have customers who otherwise might not take the plane. But I could see the rationale if it's just a gov't rest-stop, not to get off every interstate exit.

 

ETA - look at it this way, would you be OK with cops coming into your house just to "make sure" you don't have anything illegal? Then taking and running the serial #'s on every one of your guns, just to "make sure" none have been used for anything. Nevermind that the serials will be public record, commrade, we're doing this for your own good.

 

Where is that ISM cartoon. :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The car is mine, the plane is not. The passenger air companies want the checkpoints because they have customers who otherwise might not take the plane. But I could see the rationale if it's just a gov't rest-stop, not to get off every interstate exit.

 

ETA - look at it this way, would you be OK with cops coming into your house just to "make sure" you don't have anything illegal? Then taking and running the serial #'s on every one of your guns, just to "make sure" none have been used for anything. Nevermind that the serials will be public record, commrade, we're doing this for your own good.

 

The roads are public roads, my house is not a public property. I do not have to have permission from the state in order to use my house, but I do have to have permission in order to use my vehicle on public roads. Also, I'm against searches with out probable cause, but these checkpoints are not searches. If they just started searching vehicles without probable cause I'd have a major problem with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The roads are public roads, my house is not a public property. I do not have to have permission from the state in order to use my house, but I do have to have permission in order to use my vehicle on public roads. Also, I'm against searches with out probable cause, but these checkpoints are not searches. If they just started searching vehicles without probable cause I'd have a major problem with it.

 

You don't need permission for your car, you just have to be a member of the social contract which requires insurance and minimum competency. When you go trade your truck for a new one, do you have to get gov't permission? You just have to have proof of financial liability and competency in it's operation. It might be a fine line, but it's a line, just the same. Otherwise Texas couldn't extend it's castle doctrine to your car.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is the difference between a sobriety checkpoint and illegal immigration check point? Just asking if you are against those.

 

I am against those.

 

So you don't have a problem with them setting up checkpoints at high way rest areas?

 

A better analogy would be searching you before going into a bar. This airport security analogy is pretty bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information