cre8tiff Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 (edited) and you want to believe the guys that portrayed the nevada desert as the moon. I for one got this, dmarc, and I give you kudos on the snark. Edited January 11, 2010 by cre8tiff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bpwallace49 Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 The link I provided regarding NASA dodging the freedom of information request was from the Washington Times. Is that not an approved source? Could you please give me a list of approved sources for future reference? the comment was more in reference to your FIRST link. The second link seems like Have to agree here by a guy that self-admittedly has his own agenda and books to sell. I cant comment on NASA, but your first link for this whole thread is kinda thin . . . Perch, you are specifically concerned about carbon and cap and trade politics. I am more concerned with the US inability to hold businesses responsible for dumping contaminants and pollution (not necessarily carbon). Denying that humans can effect the environment is ridiculous, and clouds the very real issues in play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushwacked Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 Pot, meet kettle . . . Me starting 1 political thread does not equal the 100 Perch starts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wirehairman Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 Me starting 1 political thread does not equal the 100 Perch starts. It does not, but the "Have to agree here!" responses are just as tiresome to me. I doubt I'm alone in that thought. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perchoutofwater Posted January 11, 2010 Author Share Posted January 11, 2010 Perch, you are specifically concerned about carbon and cap and trade politics. I am more concerned with the US inability to hold businesses responsible for dumping contaminants and pollution (not necessarily carbon). Denying that humans can effect the environment is ridiculous, and clouds the very real issues in play. You will get no argument from me on this, as I completely agree with you. I'm all for reducing real pollution. That is the problem with this whole global warming issue, it takes the argument away from where it really should be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perchoutofwater Posted January 11, 2010 Author Share Posted January 11, 2010 Me starting 1 political thread does not equal the 100 Perch starts. I seem to remember you starting quite a few prior to Obama being elected. BTW, this is the first political thread if you can call it that (as I haven't slammed a single politician or party) that I've started in the last 3-4 weeks. Have to agree here!!!!!!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushwacked Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 It does not, but the "Have to agree here!" responses are just as tiresome to me. I doubt I'm alone in that thought. Don't hate the player, hate the Have to agree here Squad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caddyman Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 Pot, meet kettle . . . +1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caddyman Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 Me starting 1 political thread does not equal the 100 Perch starts. No, but you thinking anyone cares what you have to say is hilarious. Truly hilarious. Sorry, those might be too many words for you. How about I keep it short...shoo little one...shoo! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushwacked Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 (edited) this is the first political thread if you can call it that (as I haven't slammed a single politician or party) that I've started in the last 3-4 weeks. Oh yea, I forgot you were just a big science buff and you just happened to post this. Hell, don't fall off the wagon. Edited January 11, 2010 by bushwacked Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bpwallace49 Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 You will get no argument from me on this, as I completely agree with you. I'm all for reducing real pollution. That is the problem with this whole global warming issue, it takes the argument away from where it really should be. Agreed. Y'know Perch, this is why I like our little discussions. Most of the time they are actually articulate debates, versus the constant stream of crap that comes out of caddyman and others . . . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evil_gop_liars Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 No, but you thinking anyone cares what you have to say is hilarious. Truly hilarious. Coming from zeke. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuke'em ttg Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 20 degrees taday got the window down heat on the feet just like West Palm Beach out there Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tosberg34 Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 20 degrees taday got the window down heat on the feet just like West Palm Beach out there Yeah, I just got done shoveling a sidewalk and driveway full of global warming myself! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WaterMan Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 and you want to believe the guys that portrayed the nevada desert as the moon. Check out the Mythbusters episode about the Moon Landing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perchoutofwater Posted January 18, 2010 Author Share Posted January 18, 2010 A WARNING that climate change will melt most of the Himalayan glaciers by 2035 is likely to be retracted after a series of scientific blunders by the United Nations body that issued it. But hey there is a consensus right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bpwallace49 Posted January 18, 2010 Share Posted January 18, 2010 A WARNING that climate change will melt most of the Himalayan glaciers by 2035 is likely to be retracted after a series of scientific blunders by the United Nations body that issued it. If factually true it sounds like the WWF has a lot to answer for . . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cre8tiff Posted January 18, 2010 Share Posted January 18, 2010 How can there be global warming when it's so cold outside? Nice read, if you like scientific data. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.