Yukon Cornelius Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 How is being French Canadian a "separate race"? Most "other Canadians " cant stand them so they are considers a different species. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bpwallace49 Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 Most "other Canadians " cant stand them so they are considers a different species. Well played! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MojoMan Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 Global Thermonuclear War Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
millerx Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 welfare people getting prego. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evil_gop_liars Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 Obeying the law. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HowboutthemCowboys Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 to add a woman's touch here, having a menstrual cycle lol!!! sorry fellas! there should be a law.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buddahj Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 breathing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunday Couch Potatoe Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 Going Commando Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocknrobn26 Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 Smiling? Cleaning out toe jam? Pickin' out eye goobers? Pulling out nasal hair? Brushing ones teeth? Updating Windows? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Cid Posted January 13, 2010 Author Share Posted January 13, 2010 Right, so the point of this exercise is to show that only very few minuscule things about your behavior is already not covered by some form of regulation or law. Yet, every day people want more and more of them. Do people want government to wipe their ass for them too? No, wait, I'm sorry. What they want is a law stating that no one else can wipe their ass and that every one has to wipe their own. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cre8tiff Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 Right, so the point of this exercise is to show that only very few minuscule things about your behavior is already not covered by some form of regulation or law. Yet, every day people want more and more of them. Do people want government to wipe their ass for them too? No, wait, I'm sorry. What they want is a law stating that no one else can wipe their ass and that every one has to wipe their own. Ask Chuck Berry about that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bpwallace49 Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 having laws versus having laws enforced are two very different things. Case in point, ask Perch how will preventing illegal immigration is going in Texas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmarc117 Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 welfare people getting prego. wait a second!!! it sure seems the govt wants more of these people!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Cid Posted January 13, 2010 Author Share Posted January 13, 2010 having laws versus having laws enforced are two very different things. Case in point, ask Perch how will preventing illegal immigration is going in Texas. I agree entirely. What's the point of making more laws and regulation when we don't even fully enforce the ones we currently have? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clubfoothead Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 Most people who biitch about too much government really mean too much government they don't like. They still want too keep their Checkmate Pulsares. It's pretentious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bpwallace49 Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 I agree entirely. What's the point of making more laws and regulation when we don't even fully enforce the ones we currently have? That was in case a situation arises that may need a law a point to, it is a convenient reason/excuse if there is now past case law on the subject. here is an example. There was a online poker scam where the guy that sold UltimateBet to a different company retained the ability to see his opponents cards and scammed them out of 22 million dollars. because there was no LAW in place against what he was doing, he got off scot free, no jail time, etc. Sometimes the laws are done to try and anticpate people scamming loopholes in the current law and giving society legal recourse. I agree with you on the enforcement end, as it seems to be selective based on their budgets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clubfoothead Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 You can take $30,000,000,000.00 in TARP bailout money because your company is inept and then turnaround and then hand out millions in bonuses to the inept f*cks that drove the company into the ground in the first place while unemployment hovers at 10%. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yukon Cornelius Posted January 13, 2010 Share Posted January 13, 2010 Most people who biitch about too much government really mean too much government they don't like. They still want too keep their Checkmate Pulsares. It's pretentious. wurd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmarc117 Posted January 15, 2010 Share Posted January 15, 2010 http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/loca...smoking15m.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bpwallace49 Posted January 15, 2010 Share Posted January 15, 2010 Chicago banned foie gras because it is cruel to animals . . . . .later overturned because it was stupid Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmarc117 Posted January 15, 2010 Share Posted January 15, 2010 Chicago banned foie gras because it is cruel to animals . . . . .later overturned because it was stupid but breaking a calf's legs so our veal is nice and tender is so humane!!! stupid laws! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azazello1313 Posted January 15, 2010 Share Posted January 15, 2010 grow organic food the USDA has something to say about whether you can call it "organic" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bpwallace49 Posted January 15, 2010 Share Posted January 15, 2010 the USDA has something to say about whether you can call it "organic" Only if you sell it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I Like Soup Posted January 15, 2010 Share Posted January 15, 2010 This exact same thread was started in late 1860/early 1861....records were sketchier back then because Abe and Sherman burned the South down in their misguided righteous fervor. Fixed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.