tosberg34 Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 (edited) Link One VS Link Two OR Link Three Can anyone spot the glaring omission? Edited November 30, 2011 by tosberg34 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbpfan1231 Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 No mention of Boyland being a Dem? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ditkaless Wonders Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 No mention of Boyland being a Dem? I guessed this would be the case before even opening the links. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tosberg34 Posted November 30, 2011 Author Share Posted November 30, 2011 No mention of Boyland being a Dem? Winner! Winner! Chicken Dinner! No media bias at all. Nope. Fair and balanced. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushwacked Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 One is dumberer than the other. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEC=UGA Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 One is dumberer than the other. No matter, so long as they spend some time in prison, I'm happy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clubfoothead Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 I Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WaterMan Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 How hard is it to know whether your Rep is D or R? And now days we have this instant encyclopedia called the internet that will tell you which party a Rep is incase the media blackouts OWS for the initial 3 weeks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushwacked Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 No matter, so long as they spend some time in prison, I'm happy. I wasn't commenting on the original post I can't see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caddyman Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 One is dumberer than the other. Bushwacked or Waterman? Tough choice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clubfoothead Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 How long do you think it will take me to find 3 fox news stories that don't tell you what the political affiliation of Judge beat your kid down in Corpus is? And yet nobody's about that. Maybe as a x-mas gift to the Tailgate you can get a new bit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEC=UGA Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 I wasn't commenting on the original post I can't see. Basically there are three articles, one about a dem who is doing shady crap and there is no mention of him being a dem. Then there are two articles about reps fleecing the nation and selling their power and the fact that they are reps is plastered all over the place. They are all from the same news org... Anywho, they should all be imprisoned and their testicles stapled to their taint. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbpfan1231 Posted November 30, 2011 Share Posted November 30, 2011 How long do you think it will take me to find 3 fox news stories that don't tell you what the political affiliation of Judge beat your kid down in Corpus is? And yet nobody's about that. Maybe as a x-mas gift to the Tailgate you can get a new bit. Yep nobody ever mentions anything about Fox News. They are both biased - that is the world we now live in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushwacked Posted December 1, 2011 Share Posted December 1, 2011 Maybe as a x-mas gift to the Tailgate you can get a new bit. Which you refer to as a 'bit' is their modern day rallying cry. Whether it be media bias, the Socialistic Agenda, or the War on Christmas; today's right wingers are typified by complaining about a horrendously perceived slight that is out of their control. The days of taking responsibility and picking yourself up by your boot-straps to make a better life are no longer a conservative mindset. Modern day conservatives have taken their cue from Al Sharpton, play the victim card and whine about how unfair it is when the man is keeping you down. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azazello1313 Posted December 1, 2011 Share Posted December 1, 2011 Which you refer to as a 'bit' is their modern day rallying cry. Whether it be media bias, the Socialistic Agenda, or the War on Christmas; today's right wingers are typified by complaining about a horrendously perceived slight that is out of their control. pretty cute, considering your incessant hyperventilating about fox news. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redfish Posted December 1, 2011 Share Posted December 1, 2011 Bushwacked or Waterman? Tough choice. This is not close. Bushwacked may be a fringe looney, but he's our fringe looney and he probably contributes to society in some measurable way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tosberg34 Posted December 1, 2011 Author Share Posted December 1, 2011 pretty cute, considering your incessant hyperventilating about fox news. And the Tea Party. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tosberg34 Posted December 1, 2011 Author Share Posted December 1, 2011 This is not close. Bushwacked may be a fringe looney, but he's our fringe looney and he probably contributes to society in some measurable way. Name one. I can't think of any. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Square Posted December 1, 2011 Share Posted December 1, 2011 Name one. I can't think of any. People in glass houses.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEC=UGA Posted December 1, 2011 Share Posted December 1, 2011 People in glass houses.... How do they not get arrested all the time for indecent exposure? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redfish Posted December 1, 2011 Share Posted December 1, 2011 Name one. I can't think of any. I expressed confidence, but didn't issue a guarantee. In all things there must be balance. Our friends on the left help us keep the world in balance. I am grateful for their contributions. Waterman on the other hand............................... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushwacked Posted December 2, 2011 Share Posted December 2, 2011 pretty cute, considering your incessant hyperventilating about fox news. What a desperatley stupid gotcha attempt. Pointing out routine and concrete major gaffes like palm trees in WI from one news channel is not equivalent to beleiving almost all major networks are fantastically "conspiring against us." Yer doing a heckuva job BrentAztosberg. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugh B Tool Posted December 2, 2011 Share Posted December 2, 2011 (edited) Ya know, I read these silly little debates and can't help thinking how everyone in this great country of ours continues to wonder what got us to this state of affairs in the first place........ Edited December 2, 2011 by Hugh B Tool Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pope Flick Posted December 2, 2011 Share Posted December 2, 2011 (edited) Basically there are three articles, one about a dem who is doing shady crap and there is no mention of him being a dem. Then there are two articles about reps fleecing the nation and selling their power and the fact that they are reps is plastered all over the place. They are all from the same news org... Anywho, they should all be imprisoned and their testicles stapled to their taint. False. In link #3 the first mention of anyone being a republican is in paragraph #7 and the other meantions are in paragraphs 14 & 16 once each for each person convicted. Media bias? Yes. But I'll submit that the republicans are all senators or congressmen and Boyland is NY state representative. His corruption doesn't effect me in California but the other two articles do since it's regarding behavior at the federal level. But once again, Faux News is guilty of more than bias, they make stuff up and assign clips to events that did not happen they way they are reporting they happened. That's not bias. That's lying. That's a big difference that you guys willfully overlook. Edited December 2, 2011 by Pope Flick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azazello1313 Posted December 2, 2011 Share Posted December 2, 2011 Pointing out routine and concrete major gaffes like palm trees in WI from one news channel is not equivalent to beleiving almost all major networks are fantastically "conspiring against us." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.