thebrowneye1 Posted November 20, 2004 Share Posted November 20, 2004 10 team dynasty M. Bulger, O. Smith, late 1st Rnd pick(7-10) for T. Bell and T. Calico (w/no pick) Do you think this is fair trade? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
legend42 Posted November 20, 2004 Share Posted November 20, 2004 10 team dynasty M. Bulger, O. Smith, late 1st Rnd pick(7-10) for T. Bell and T. Calico (w/no pick) Do you think this is fair trade? 565801[/snapback] No way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darin3 Posted November 20, 2004 Share Posted November 20, 2004 That is as wack as it gets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donutrun Jellies Posted November 20, 2004 Share Posted November 20, 2004 The pick's on the wrong side of the deal ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pzarvell Posted November 20, 2004 Share Posted November 20, 2004 Define "whack". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1badfish Posted November 20, 2004 Share Posted November 20, 2004 10 team dynasty M. Bulger, O. Smith, late 1st Rnd pick(7-10) for T. Bell and T. Calico (w/no pick) Do you think this is fair trade? 565801[/snapback] Usually I stay out of these topics. I don't like the idea of a trade veto. However, this is clearly someone trying to help out the other. How could anybody propose such a trade in the 11th week. Is either of these two even active? This is definately one sided. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ralph Furley Posted November 20, 2004 Share Posted November 20, 2004 Terrible trade. I agree the 1st round pick should be on the other side of the trade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebrowneye1 Posted November 20, 2004 Author Share Posted November 20, 2004 Define "whack". 565962[/snapback] Whack- Incredibly One sided And the team that got Bulger has outside shot at making the playoffs at 4-6 with 3 weeks to go Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maddog59 Posted November 20, 2004 Share Posted November 20, 2004 Looks like collusion to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pzarvell Posted November 20, 2004 Share Posted November 20, 2004 Hmmm. Eventhough it's one sided AND probably a bad future trade, I'll play the Devil's advocate here. Why would a team colluding for THIS year give up a pick for next? Is he moving and going to be out of the league? That doesn't make sense to me (although the trade doesn't either). Does the guy giving up Bulger have another QB that has future potential? If it's a legit trade, the guy giving up so much much really believe Bell is the future star of the Broncos AND sees the future of the Vikes the same as the present - IE RBBC. I don't necessarily disagree with that, so I don't think it's collusion - more likely a bad trade. Did you ask them? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cspoerl Posted November 20, 2004 Share Posted November 20, 2004 whack Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebrowneye1 Posted November 21, 2004 Author Share Posted November 21, 2004 (edited) Hmmm. Eventhough it's one sided AND probably a bad future trade, I'll play the Devil's advocate here. Why would a team colluding for THIS year give up a pick for next? Is he moving and going to be out of the league? That doesn't make sense to me (although the trade doesn't either). Does the guy giving up Bulger have another QB that has future potential? If it's a legit trade, the guy giving up so much much really believe Bell is the future star of the Broncos AND sees the future of the Vikes the same as the present - IE RBBC. I don't necessarily disagree with that, so I don't think it's collusion - more likely a bad trade. Did you ask them? 566278[/snapback] [/quote To answer your ?s The hole draft pick thing is what sent up the Red flag for me. The guy who gave up Bulger was rumored to be quiting at the end of the year but now that he has Bell he's staying.(? info from the commish who also happens to be the recipient of Bulger in the trade) The guy that gave up Bulger has T. Green, Vinny T., and P. Rivers. And the league was asked and apparently no other team execpt myself and one other owner thought it was BS. Edited November 21, 2004 by thebrowneye1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digitaldan21 Posted November 21, 2004 Share Posted November 21, 2004 This trade blows. -DD21 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.