DMD Posted August 29, 2005 Share Posted August 29, 2005 one thing to realize about Index - they always love Denver players. They had Rod Smith like #4 last year for WR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumpin Johnies Posted August 29, 2005 Author Share Posted August 29, 2005 one thing to realize about Index - they always love Denver players. They had Rod Smith like #4 last year for WR. 955270[/snapback] I had Rod Smith on my team last season and he had a good year, but it wasn't that good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thews40 Posted August 29, 2005 Share Posted August 29, 2005 I still think Skeletor will break tradition and go with a pseudo RBBC. Ok by me, but during the 7th round or later, he is a steal. The other problem with Bell is not holding onto the rock. If, on the few carries shanny gives him he drops it, it's lights out unless Anderson gets hurt. I also see Dayne as the Zack Crocket of this team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Misfit Posted August 29, 2005 Share Posted August 29, 2005 For what it is worth, Fantasy Football Index has Mike Anderson Rated the 5th OVERALL pick. Even ahead of Manning! While that may be much, they do have Bell as the 38th RB on the board. At least the Index knows a Fraud when they see one! 955211[/snapback] I don't think the Index deserves props for this. They were the first mag to come out with Bell being the #3 RB this year. They were so high on Bell he's on their cover. Ian even said on his website a few weeks ago Bell would be a "defining pick" for them, since they were the only ones who had Bell rated that high. The Index perpetuated a fraud. Ranking Anderson at #5 right now is more hopeful than analytical. They hope to be able to say "Well, we may have picked the wrong back in Bell, but at least we were right about a Denver RB ending up in the top 5." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rd and short Posted August 29, 2005 Share Posted August 29, 2005 Good point DMD! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainHook Posted August 29, 2005 Share Posted August 29, 2005 (edited) His rehabilitation has gone well over the past year and as evidenced by his 95 yard run against the Colts, he is healthy once again. 955131[/snapback] Please give the Colts' defense its due credit. Anderson only had a 93 yard run. Please correct this gross injustice. Edited August 29, 2005 by CaptainHook Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainHook Posted August 29, 2005 Share Posted August 29, 2005 Anybody that is counting on a Denver runningback as more than a #3 is in deep trouble. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turf Smurf Posted August 29, 2005 Share Posted August 29, 2005 ..... they always love Denver players ..... 955270[/snapback] Nothing wrong with that! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WaterMan Posted August 29, 2005 Share Posted August 29, 2005 Mike Anderson is about the same age as Curtis Martin. Who predicted almost 1700 yards and 12 TDs, 2 TDs receiving for Martin last year? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainHook Posted August 29, 2005 Share Posted August 29, 2005 Mike Anderson is about the same age as Curtis Martin. Who predicted almost 1700 yards and 12 TDs, 2 TDs receiving for Martin last year? 955347[/snapback] Rovers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WaterMan Posted August 29, 2005 Share Posted August 29, 2005 (edited) Rovers. 955369[/snapback] He was better than most fantasy sites and sports channels. He should start his own website/cable channel. Edited August 29, 2005 by WaterMan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riffraff Posted August 29, 2005 Share Posted August 29, 2005 (edited) FF websites are catching up to the depth chart: FFLPros had Anderson as the #23 RB since the 25th. Bell = #38. One glaring omission: Willie Parker = not on their list of 86 RBs. Edited August 29, 2005 by Riffraff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted August 29, 2005 Share Posted August 29, 2005 why hasn't anyone mentioned Griffin blew out his ACl last year... also..I've said this plenty...he had one outstanding game and 4 shiddy ones...and when I say shiddy...I mean shiddy.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted August 29, 2005 Share Posted August 29, 2005 Rovers. 955369[/snapback] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yo mama Posted August 29, 2005 Share Posted August 29, 2005 why hasn't anyone mentioned Griffin blew out his ACl last year... 955493[/snapback] Hey now, don't forget Griffin also blew out that petalar (sp?) tendon. However, he managed his first preseason game last week without reinjury, which is encouraging. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avernus Posted August 29, 2005 Share Posted August 29, 2005 Hey now, don't forget Griffin also blew out that petalar (sp?) tendon. However, he managed his first preseason game last week without reinjury, which is encouraging. 955504[/snapback] yuup...I was a Griffin owner last year...he's no more than a change of pace back.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roy Posted August 30, 2005 Share Posted August 30, 2005 I wouldn't draft any Den RB this year. Too scary. 955080[/snapback] Doesnt this sound familiar? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumpin Johnies Posted August 30, 2005 Author Share Posted August 30, 2005 Anybody that is counting on a Denver runningback as more than a #3 is in deep trouble. 955330[/snapback] Anderson's my #4. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumpin Johnies Posted August 30, 2005 Author Share Posted August 30, 2005 FF websites are catching up to the depth chart: FFLPros had Anderson as the #23 RB since the 25th. Bell = #38. One glaring omission: Willie Parker = not on their list of 86 RBs. 955492[/snapback] DMD's got Parker updated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Posted August 30, 2005 Share Posted August 30, 2005 Bell could very well be the starter in the 2nd half. Denver produces, that's why people want them. I got Anderson in the 8th and how many starters are available that late? Good #4 imo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ursa Majoris Posted August 30, 2005 Share Posted August 30, 2005 I was on Yahoo 5 minutes ago and they still have this chump rated 25th overall. ESPN's ranking isn't too far behind. 955052[/snapback] I did a Yahoo draft last night and Onterrio Smith, Correll Buckhalter and Freddie Jones all got drafted by people using the Yahoo listings. I was waiting for David Boston to go, but he never did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumpin Johnies Posted August 30, 2005 Author Share Posted August 30, 2005 Bell could very well be the starter in the 2nd half. Denver produces, that's why people want them. I got Anderson in the 8th and how many starters are available that late? Good #4 imo. 955835[/snapback] 8th round is a good risk/reward pick for Anderson. JMHO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TJOLIRPH Posted August 30, 2005 Share Posted August 30, 2005 the ww is good risk/reward also Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Posted August 30, 2005 Share Posted August 30, 2005 8th round is a good risk/reward pick for Anderson. JMHO. 955890[/snapback] I thought so at the time. I traded down and got an extra 8th round pick and took him. Nothing else available with as much potential, but time will tell. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumpin Johnies Posted August 30, 2005 Author Share Posted August 30, 2005 the ww is good risk/reward also 955948[/snapback] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.