DocNiner52 Posted June 25, 2006 Share Posted June 25, 2006 Already have Harrison,D Jax,Chad Jackson, Sammie Parker. Considering one of these two with my next pick. Which one in your opinion will be the better receiver in a dynasty league, Mark Bradley or Sinorice Moss? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yobonk Posted June 25, 2006 Share Posted June 25, 2006 Moss. Don't trust Bradley's injury. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Holliday Posted June 25, 2006 Share Posted June 25, 2006 Already have Harrison,D Jax,Chad Jackson, Sammie Parker. Considering one of these two with my next pick. Which one in your opinion will be the better receiver in a dynasty league, Mark Bradley or Sinorice Moss? I think Moss is the best WR coming out of the draft this year, he is who I would go with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomfin2000 Posted June 25, 2006 Share Posted June 25, 2006 I'd vote for Moss as well. The Bears just aren't a passing team and I don't see that changing anytime soon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
broncosn05 Posted June 25, 2006 Share Posted June 25, 2006 I think Moss is the best WR coming out of the draft this year, he is who I would go with. Sanantonio Holmes, Chad Jackson.... But I agree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Griff Has Landed Posted June 25, 2006 Share Posted June 25, 2006 Gotta go with Moss. He could easily be a front-runner for the new breed of small, elite WR's. (i.e. Steve Smith, Santana Moss) In an explosive offense like NYG has, I would take Moss and see how he moves into a more prominent role as he gets more playing time. He should be a good slot WR this year for them as he could stretch the field with his speed. I like him and Mark Clayton as two of the young WR's to have a bright future. I'd like Holmes in Pittsburgh if he could stay out of trouble with the law, but he is also in a run-heavy offense so I don't like him as of yet till they open it up more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazysight Posted June 25, 2006 Share Posted June 25, 2006 I'd go with Moss but I don't really trust him too much either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROYALWITCHEESE Posted June 25, 2006 Share Posted June 25, 2006 I'd go with Moss but I don't really trust him too much either. Bradley Bradley Bradley. He is a prototypical #1 WR with tons of potential. He began to flash it before the injury. ACLs these days are routine, and I expect him to make it back with no problem. He'll be the #2 this year and could overtake Moose by next season. Moss will never be any more than a return specialist/3 WR no matter where he plays. I would NEVER draft Sinorice Moss.... Go with Bradley in a dynasty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Posted June 25, 2006 Share Posted June 25, 2006 I'd go with Moss but I don't really trust him too much either. Boldin is the only rookie WR in recent memory that did anything. I like Greg Jennings(polished and GB needs someone) and Chad. NE has an opening as well. But there I would go Moss. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonorator Posted June 27, 2006 Share Posted June 27, 2006 i think moss is a no-brainer, if for nothing else, the offenses they belong to. CHI is hardly a passing force, plus the guy is coming back from a torn ACL. moss could see playing time sooner and is in the better situation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DocNiner52 Posted June 27, 2006 Author Share Posted June 27, 2006 Thanks for all the advice. I took Moss. I think Bradley could be there come my pick in the next round. Here's another dilema. I have Antonio Gates as my only TE so far. Quite possible that Zach Hilton, Jermaine Wiggins, Leonard Pope as well as WR Bradley will be available. I surely need another TE but do I take Bradley(won't last 2 more rounds) and wait on a TE. If I do that I'm sure Hilton will be gone as well as Pope. I'm sure that TE Scheffler will be there and I like his upside, plus I have Plummer and Cutler. Whaddya think? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRU SOLDJA 22 Posted June 27, 2006 Share Posted June 27, 2006 I woulda went Bradley. Moss won't survive the big hit from S Taylor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DocNiner52 Posted June 27, 2006 Author Share Posted June 27, 2006 (edited) Maybe so about taking Bradley but looking at the guys who are drafting in front of me before my next pick, which is 7 picks from now, only one of them I see as wanting or needing to take a WR. If he takes one I'm thinking he'll take the rookie Greg Jennings or possibly a WR who could help him for a year or two. McCardell is still there as well as Booker,Engram,Ferguson,Lelie,Toomer,Stokely and the much hyped rookie Brandon Marshall. Bradley does have good upside inspite of his injury last year and could quite easily be the Bears #1 WR by next season. I just have questions about the QB position there. Regardless of who's QBing Bradley's gonna get plenty of opportunities. Part of drafting in an initial dynasty is finding out how the other owners are drafting, their needs at the present, any tendencies they may have(homerism,rookieitis, and such). We drafted nothing but defensive players in rounds 8 thru 13. My next pick is 21.07, so in a plain dynasty draft with no IDP's this will actually be round 15. If I can get Bradley there it will quite good value for a round 15 pick. Heck, even if he's gone I should still have a shot at either Greg Jennings or Brandon Marshall which even for rookies they have good value at this point in the draft. I ask for advice here at the huddle,which I am a member, because I value the opinions, advice and suggestions they give when I propose a question. What I consider to be some of the best fantasy football players reside here at the Huddle and that's always a plus. I visit the other message boards around and it's always good to do that to get various points of view and use them to compare with what info I get from the Huddle. Still, I use info and advice from here and it's done pretty good for me since I joined and has helped me to win numerous titles(money and free). I don't normally post very much here because a lot of the time people's views and opinions mirror mine. OK, enough rambling. If you want good fantasy advice I think there's none better than here at the Huddle. Pimping us ain't I . I'm proud to say too that I will be a member of the Huddle team playing this year in the Interboard Challenge League against 4 other fantasy football sites. I was a member of the team a few years ago and want to help the Huddle get back on top again. Anyway, thanks for all your advice guys, give yourselves a hand Keep it coming!! Edited June 27, 2006 by DocNiner52 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DocNiner52 Posted June 28, 2006 Author Share Posted June 28, 2006 I woulda went Bradley. Moss won't survive the big hit from S Taylor Well, if Sean Taylor nails him little Moss' big brother Santana may not like that and have to whoop Taylors' rearend Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sacosud Posted June 28, 2006 Share Posted June 28, 2006 I had this same situation come up in my contract keeper league round 16 and I took Holmes over Moss. I like Moss in the Giant offense, but decided on Holmes. I like Holme's route running,hands, and speed..Holme's accelration after the catch is the most impressive thing in his game in my mind. Moss can flat fly but is smaller and is not as polished as Holmes when it comes to route running and his hands are not quite at Holme's level. I do like Moss though and very late in a keeper/dynasty league holds alot of value that late..Good pick. I think Holmes will be fine as far as trouble and Pittsburg is concerned it will be addressed rest assure on that!!!! BUT they did move up 7 spots and gave alot to get Holmes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DocNiner52 Posted July 1, 2006 Author Share Posted July 1, 2006 (edited) Bradley Bradley Bradley. He is a prototypical #1 WR with tons of potential. He began to flash it before the injury. ACLs these days are routine, and I expect him to make it back with no problem. He'll be the #2 this year and could overtake Moose by next season. Moss will never be any more than a return specialist/3 WR no matter where he plays. I would NEVER draft Sinorice Moss.... Go with Bradley in a dynasty. I had taken WR Sinorice Moss with this pick. I really had considered Bradley as well but there was more attention being payed to Moss. If I took Bradley with the pick I'm sure Moss wouldn't have been there next round for me. RoyalWitCheese, I agree with your assessment of Bradley. You and Tru Soldja were the only two touting Bradley. I really feel Bradley will end up being the better receiver and within time will be Chicago's #1 WR. The Bears are not an offensive juggernaut but as Benson and Grossman get more playing time and develop the O should be decent. Well, I'm glad to let you know that even since I took Moss and felt Bradley was under the radar a bit, I was able to draft WR Bradley with my next pick. Glad I took the gamble on him being there for me in the next round. Thanks for all you guys' advice, you did pretty good for me. Another guy I'm looking at taking in a couple of rounds in San Diego's WR Vincent Jackson. With his continuing improvement and McCardell may only play a couple of more years, I think Jackson has a legit shot at being a starter and could possibly end up being the #1 WR for the Chargers. Any thought? Edited July 1, 2006 by DocNiner52 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DocNiner52 Posted July 1, 2006 Author Share Posted July 1, 2006 Glad I picked Bradleywhen I did. The guy picking after me left a list for the commish to make his pick and at the top of his list was none other than Bradley.He had to settle for Ashley Lelie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrGameTime Posted July 2, 2006 Share Posted July 2, 2006 I go with Sinorice Moss, over the other option not that I think he is so great coming into the league but I think he can fit in and get productive quikly coming from the U. The U is on a fast track when it comes to going to the next level! DOn't forget that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.