irish Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 My team- Romo Gore, C. Taylor, T Jones, Benson, and M Moore Harrison, D Jax, Mason, Gabriel, Wilford and Curtis LJ Smith All TDs are 6 points with 1 pt for 10 yds rush/rec and 20 pass. 5 point bonuses as 300 pass, 100 rush/rec. Start- QB, 2 RBs, 3 WRs, TE I get Colston and Barlow or Maroney and give up C Taylor and Mason or Gabriel. This trade would leave me weak at RB but give me 3 Top notch WRs. What should I do? Rhodes is also a FA, so I could add him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slickvick Posted November 14, 2006 Share Posted November 14, 2006 I like it.Colston makes up for what you are losing at RB and you still have an OK Rb situation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irish Posted November 15, 2006 Author Share Posted November 15, 2006 (edited) anyone else? and who should I go for Barlow or Maroney? Edited November 15, 2006 by irish Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gros Membres! Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 Oh, I'd probably go Maroney. Houston should be back in the mix soon in NY. I like Maroney's upside and NE in the winter = run. I'd do this trade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irish Posted November 15, 2006 Author Share Posted November 15, 2006 Oh, I'd probably go Maroney. Houston should be back in the mix soon in NY. I like Maroney's upside and NE in the winter = run. I'd do this trade. Good points. And you'd trust going with Gore and T Jones/Benson as your RBs with Maroney as a backup? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetFanMike Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 I do NOT think I'd do it too. Chester Taylor has a ridiculously advantageous schedule left -- Miami-Arizona-Bears isn't great, but then he finishes Lions-Jets-Packers-Rams. Colston has been great, but December is a month for runners, not receivers; plus his matchups are not that great. Worst case Chester goes down, you have Mewelde and the Chicago backs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irish Posted November 15, 2006 Author Share Posted November 15, 2006 I do NOT think I'd do it too. Chester Taylor has a ridiculously advantageous schedule left -- Miami-Arizona-Bears isn't great, but then he finishes Lions-Jets-Packers-Rams. Colston has been great, but December is a month for runners, not receivers; plus his matchups are not that great. Worst case Chester goes down, you have Mewelde and the Chicago backs. This has been part of my fear is Gore goes down I'm done. And I think with Harrison and D Jax I should be okay playing the matchups with a 3rd WR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gros Membres! Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 I think Chester may be running out of gas. He was held out of practice last week for general body soreness and 75 yards against the GB D isn't great, especially when they allow 65 yards receiving to RBs as well. Chester's great schedule means nothing if he isn't playing up to speed, imho. Also, if Rhodes is a FA I'd probably add him for speculative depth. I have Chester and I'm starting to sour on him. Schedule Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grits and Shins Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 Always trade the players that score the least amount of points for players that score the most amount of points. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irish Posted November 15, 2006 Author Share Posted November 15, 2006 Always trade the players that score the least amount of points for players that score the most amount of points. I have a feeling as to what I want to do. I realize now this generic statement is just a substitution for the ignore post but if you're going to type this message out might as well give your opinion on which side of the deal you feel will score the most points. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soco Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 I think Chester may be running out of gas. He was held out of practice last week for general body soreness and 75 yards against the GB D isn't great, especially when they allow 65 yards receiving to RBs as well. Chester's great schedule means nothing if he isn't playing up to speed, imho. Also, if Rhodes is a FA I'd probably add him for speculative depth. I have Chester and I'm starting to sour on him. Schedule I agree with him the Vikes look to be on the low road right now . i like the trade Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingsleyjr Posted November 15, 2006 Share Posted November 15, 2006 (edited) Always trade the players that score the least amount of points for players that score the most amount of points. If u ask after the fact he gives u a hard time , if u ask before the trade for some advice he responds with dumb statements. I guess he would rather no questions be asked . Colston and Maroney . Just Do It. Edited November 15, 2006 by kingsleyjr Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irish Posted November 15, 2006 Author Share Posted November 15, 2006 If u ask after the fact he gives u a hard time , if u ask before the trade for some advice he responds with dumb statements. I guess he would rather no questions be asked . Colston and Maroney . Just Do It. Agreed. Thanks for the input by the way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.