Jump to content
[[Template core/front/custom/_customHeader is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

War, Religion, Politics, etc...


sundaynfl
 Share

Recommended Posts

Tax thoughts as April 15th approaches

 

 

 

Explanation of tax cuts --

 

Sometimes politicians, journalists and others exclaim; "It's just a tax

cut for the rich!" and that is just accepted to be fact, without

question. But what does that really mean?

Just in case you are not completely clear on this issue, the following

might help.

 

Let's put tax cuts in terms everyone can understand.

 

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer, drink the same amount,

and the bill for all ten comes to $100.

If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something

like this:

 

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.

The fifth would pay $1...

The sixth would pay $3...

The seventh would pay $7.

The eighth would pay $12.

The ninth would pay $18.

The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

So, that's what they decided to do.

 

The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy

with the arrangement, until on day, the owner threw them a curve.

"Since you are all such good customers," he said, "I'm going to reduce the

cost of your daily beer by $20."Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.

 

 

 

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so the

first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But what

about the other six men - the paying customers? How could they divide the

$20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair share?'

They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted

that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would

each end up being paid to drink his beer.

So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each

man's bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the

amounts each should pay.

 

 

 

And so:

 

The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).

The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings).

The seventh now pay $5 instead of $7 (28%savings).

The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).

The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).

The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).

 

 

 

Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued

to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to

compare their savings.

 

"I only got a dollar out of the $20," declared the sixth man. He pointed

to the tenth man," but he got $10!"

"Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar,

too. It's unfair that he got ten times more than I!"

That's true!!" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get $10 back when

I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!"

"Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison. "We didn't get

anything at all. The system exploits the poor!"

 

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine

sat down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill,

they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between

all of them for even half of the bill!

 

 

 

And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our

 

tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most

 

benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being

 

wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start

 

drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tax thoughts as April 15th approaches

 

 

 

Explanation of tax cuts --

 

Sometimes politicians, journalists and others exclaim; "It's just a tax

cut for the rich!" and that is just accepted to be fact, without

question. But what does that really mean?

Just in case you are not completely clear on this issue, the following

might help.

 

Let's put tax cuts in terms everyone can understand.

 

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer, drink the same amount,

and the bill for all ten comes to $100.

If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something

like this:

 

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.

The fifth would pay $1...

The sixth would pay $3...

The seventh would pay $7.

The eighth would pay $12.

The ninth would pay $18.

The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

So, that's what they decided to do.

 

The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy

with the arrangement, until on day, the owner threw them a curve.

"Since you are all such good customers," he said, "I'm going to reduce the

cost of your daily beer by $20."Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.

 

 

 

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so the

first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But what

about the other six men - the paying customers? How could they divide the

$20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair share?'

They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted

that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would

each end up being paid to drink his beer.

So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each

man's bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the

amounts each should pay.

 

 

 

And so:

 

The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).

The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings).

The seventh now pay $5 instead of $7 (28%savings).

The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).

The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).

The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).

 

 

 

Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued

to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to

compare their savings.

 

"I only got a dollar out of the $20," declared the sixth man. He pointed

to the tenth man," but he got $10!"

"Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar,

too. It's unfair that he got ten times more than I!"

That's true!!" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get $10 back when

I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!"

"Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison. "We didn't get

anything at all. The system exploits the poor!"

 

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine

sat down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill,

they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between

all of them for even half of the bill!

 

 

 

And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our

 

tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most

 

benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being

 

wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start

 

drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.

 

the smart ones went over sees years ago

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting.

wiegie is this true?

 

It must be true, it's on the internet.

 

(Of course, I'm sure many rich people would be greatly offended at the implication that they are unpatriotic and are willing to renounce their US citizenship just to save a buck or two.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It must be true, it's on the internet.

 

(Of course, I'm sure many rich people would be greatly offended at the implication that they are unpatriotic and are willing to renounce their US citizenship just to save a buck or two.)

 

 

I'm impressed with the consistency of your answer three years later. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works.

 

:D:D

 

This is by far one of the best posts that I've read regarding the tax system in our country. An excellent metaphorical approach so that even the most confused are no longer in the dark. It is this reason explained above that I will never under-appreciate the amount of income that all of the richest legal US citizens pour into our tax system.

 

:bash::clap:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:D:D

 

This is by far one of the best posts that I've read regarding the tax system in our country. An excellent metaphorical approach so that even the most confused are no longer in the dark. It is this reason explained above that I will never under-appreciate the amount of income that all of the richest legal US citizens pour into our tax system.

 

:bash::clap:

 

:tup::doh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's absolutely true (notice how wedgie tries to be cute and not answer).

 

Az, as I said in the thread from 2004, we've already been through this numerous times and it's not worth getting into again.

 

(Although I will mention again that another problem with the analogy is that it makes the assumption that everyone is getting the same drink. That is certainly not the case in the real world.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It must be true, it's on the internet.

 

(Of course, I'm sure many rich people would be greatly offended at the implication that they are unpatriotic and are willing to renounce their US citizenship just to save a buck or two.)

 

Doesn't work that way. If a primary purpose of renouncing your citizenship is to avoid US tax, you still have to pay US taxes on your world-wide income for 10 years even if you never step foot back on American soil. There are some rules that soften the effect of double-taxation, but it ain't as simple as turning in your American flag lapel pin at the airport duty free shop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't work that way. If a primary purpose of renouncing your citizenship is to avoid US tax, you still have to pay US taxes on your world-wide income for 10 years even if you never step foot back on American soil. There are some rules that soften the effect of double-taxation, but it ain't as simple as turning in your American flag lapel pin at the airport duty free shop.

 

So that makes this whole thread even that much more retarded.

 

(how exactly, though, do they make these expats pay?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So that makes this whole thread even that much more retarded.

 

(how exactly, though, do they make these expats pay?)

 

Seize assets they have in the US. If they're being paid by US companies, they can garnish wages.

Edited by yo mama
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information