Phat1 Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 I may be just a bit biased, but I think you'll end up being pleasantly surprised with Brandon Jackson. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 1. Reggie Nelson 2. Erick Wright 3. Tank Tyler 4. Michael Bush Why couldnt we have went this way? I would've gone 1 - Leon Hall/Aaron Ross 2 - Brandon Jackson seems like about the best pick available here; Tyler sounds like Cletidus Hunt to me. Still seeing how the 3rd shakes out before I "Saturday Evening GM" that round. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piratesownninjas Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 I may be just a bit biased, but I think you'll end up being pleasantly surprised with Brandon Jackson. I have no problem on this pick. We just reached everywhere else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Chavez, the eternal optimist... Am I becoming the policyvote of Packer fans? Let's put it this way - when your reaches work out, nobody remembers they were reaches (except in rare instances like Jeff Lageman); if you draft players where they SHOULD be drafted and they don't pan out, you become an idiot (like Matt Millen - most GMs would've picked Harrington, Rogers, and even Mike Williams where he did - he just managed to be in position to have all 3 blow up in his face instead of just one). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piratesownninjas Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 I would've gone 1 - Leon Hall/Aaron Ross 2 - Brandon Jackson seems like about the best pick available here; Tyler sounds like Cletidus Hunt to me. Still seeing how the 3rd shakes out before I "Saturday Evening GM" that round. I was throwing Tyler in to show we could have went elsewhere and still gotten a DT. Leon Hall was the other guy I was hoping for if it wasnt Reggie Nelson. I thought at least one of them would have been gone. For them both to be there and to skip them just hurts a bit. Although the last time I was this disappointed was when we skipped Andy Katzenmoyer... That turned out to be a good move. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piratesownninjas Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Am I becoming the policyvote of Packer fans? Let's put it this way - when your reaches work out, nobody remembers they were reaches (except in rare instances like Jeff Lageman); if you draft players where they SHOULD be drafted and they don't pan out, you become an idiot (like Matt Millen - most GMs would've picked Harrington, Rogers, and even Mike Williams where he did - he just managed to be in position to have all 3 blow up in his face instead of just one). No, you're nowhere near that bad. I think you're on the right path. Im probably just having a knee jerk reaction. Although I do not DO NOT like the Jones pick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Although the last time I was this disappointed was when we skipped Andy Katzenmoyer... That turned out to be a good move. Yeah, the Big Kat turned out to be a p*ssy, all right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 (edited) Although I do not DO NOT like the Jones pick. No, I don't either - smaller school guy who doesn't have great production or measurables, and little value as RS fodder. Edited April 29, 2007 by Chavez Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piratesownninjas Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Although if we skip Tanard Jackson here, I will be absolutley pissed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 2 - Brandon Jackson seems like about the best pick available here; Tyler sounds like Cletidus Hunt to me. Actually, I didn't realize Bush, Pittman, and Hunt were still sitting there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piratesownninjas Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Aaron Rousse... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Although if we skip Tanard Jackson here, I will be absolutley pissed. Aaron Rousse... Liar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 SO do they put Rouse in as S, or use him as OLB? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piratesownninjas Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 SO do they put Rouse in as S, or use him as OLB? I would imagine Saftey... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piratesownninjas Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Liar. For whatever reason I forgot he was still on the board. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 By BOB McGINN bmcginn@journalsentinel.com Posted: April 28, 2007 Green Bay - The Green Bay Packers chose to live dangerously Saturday in the first two rounds of the National Football League draft, selecting a talented nose tackle who couldn't stay healthy and a lightly used junior running back with an injury history of his own. Defensive tackle Justin Harrell of Tennessee was the 16th overall pick, and running back Brandon Jackson was pick No. 63 late in the second round. With the first of their two third-round picks (No. 78), the Packers took a flyer on James Jones, a wide receiver who flew under the scouting radar screen at San Jose State. Later, with the No. 89 choice, they went with Virginia Tech safety Aaron Rouse, a classic example of a player who in scouts' parlance "looks like Tarzan and plays like Jane." Orchestrating his third draft in Green Bay, general manager Ted Thompson took Harrell (6-4 1/2, 314 pounds) even though defensive tackle seemed just about the least of the team's concerns. "We don't draft based on need," Thompson said. "We don't think that's the best policy. We think really and truly the more good football players, regardless of position, that you can add to your team the better off you are as an organization and as a team." By taking Harrell, the Packers added what they rated as the finest defensive tackle in the draft. Among the players on the board at the time were Leon Hall, who rated a slight edge among teams as the top cornerback in the draft; Reggie Nelson, a dynamic ballhawk at safety; and Brady Quinn, the second-best quarterback. Thompson defended his choice of Harrell even though he had to sit out 15 games in his four-year career. His senior season was ruined by a torn biceps in Week 2. "I think he had the potential to be a single-digit pick," said Thompson. "He's a good pass rusher inside. He plays with length, he plays with his arms. He's a great athlete." Harrell weighed 300 at the combine in late February, then 314 a few weeks later at his pro day. At the lower weight, his 40-yard dash time of 5.06 ranked about average among the top 10 tackles. His vertical jump of 30 1/2 inches tied for second best among the top 12 tackles, and his strength in the bench press (31 reps at 225 pounds) was solid. Harrell's score of 24 on the 50-question Wonderlic intelligence test was the highest among the 12 best players at his position. "Outstanding football player who we really coveted at 16," coach Mike McCarthy said. "We are going to build this football team strong with the offensive and defensive lines. You just cannot have enough big guys. His versatility is what really stands out when you watch him." Harrell's 34 1/2-inch arms tied for eighth longest among the 50 defensive linemen at the combine. He also was the second tallest among the top 10 tackles. Scouts decried the absence of competent tackles with brawn in this draft. Thompson referred to the shortage of big run stuffers as "a big hole" after Harrell. The Packers will be keeping their fingers crossed that a player at probably the most physically demanding in football will hold up better in the pros than he did in college. Thompson said Harrell would be equally at home as a nose tackle or three-technique in a 4-3 defense. He had just four sacks in 35 games (25 starts) but the GM argued that he had pass-rush ability. Later, the Packers had this array of players on the board when their second-round pick (No. 47) arrived: wide receiver Steve Smith, running backs Kenny Irons and Chris Henry, defensive ends Victor Abiamiri and Ikaika Alama-Francis, linebacker David Harris and cornerback Eric Wright. Rather than make the pick, Thompson traded down for the 14th time in his career, enabling the Jets to move up 16 spots. In return for No. 47 and a seventh-round pick (No. 235), the Packers obtained a third-round pick (No. 89) and a sixth-round choice (No. 191). In the span of those 16 picks, Smith, Irons, Henry, Abiamiri, Alama-Francis, Harris and Wright all were selected by other teams. Thus, Thompson attempted to plug one of his primary needs with Jackson (5-10, 208). He was the sixth running back selected. Green Bay took Jackson over backs Antonio Pittman, Tony Hunt, Michael Bush and Lorenzo Booker. "Tough guy," coach Mike McCarthy said. "He fits our zone scheme running downhill. Very instinctive. Natural runner. Natural athlete. Excellent feet. No wasted steps. Looks like a natural catcher." Jackson underwent operations on each shoulder to repair labrum damage in the last two years, but McCarthy said he passed the team's physical. A third-year junior, Jackson hadn't done much of anything (two starts, 442 yards) until 2006. Then he broke out of a running-back-by-committee arrangement to gain 989 yards (5.3 average) and catch 33 passes. In all, he started merely 11 games and gained just 1,431 yards before declaring a year early. "We liked Pittman," McCarthy said. "I think with Jackson's (size) he really fits our run scheme." Said offensive coordinator Joe Philbin: "No. 1, we thought he was a tough guy. Could break some tackles. Pretty good size and speed. "There were two running backs who were highly thought of and there was subjectivity from there on out. I think he is a real fine player." Jones' modest credentials stamp him as one of the most unheralded high picks that the Packers have made in many a year. Wide receiver was considered by some personnel people as the deepest position in the draft, and Jones didn't cause many ripples in the talent pool. A two-year starter at San Jose, Jones (6-0 1/2, 207) caught 70 passes for 893 yards (12.8) and 10 touchdowns in 2006 and was named team MVP. Invited to the combine, Jones ran the 40 in just 4.54 seconds. His jumps weren't anything special and he scored 9 on the Wonderlic test in 2006. That was the lowest among 43 wide receivers at the combine for whom scores were available. In 44 games (21 starts) Jones averaged just 11.9 per catch. He also returned punts. "He's a real football player," Thompson said. "He has size. He's about 6-1, but he plays larger than that. When he goes for the ball defenders fall apart." Said Jones: "I am so excited that I am almost speechless." Rouse (6-4, 220) followed up an outstanding junior season with a dismal senior season. He has prototypical size but doesn't play to his numbers. He missed a lot of assignments in coverage and was an inconsistent tackler. "Like most Virginia Tech players, he's a very dynamic special-teams player," Thompson said. "He's a heavy hitter. In our opinion, the coaches say he's going to be fine in coverage." At the combine, Rouse ran 40 yards 4.58, then improved to 4.56 at his pro day. He did well in change of direction drills for his size but didn't show much strength in bench-press testing, lifting 225 pounds just 16 times. Rouse was the tallest safety in the draft and also one of the heaviest. His stature might be imposing but he hasn't come close to playing up to it. At safety, Rouse will join holdovers Marviel Underwood, Tyrone Culver and Atari Bigby in an attempt to dislodge Marquand Manuel as the starting safety opposite Nick Collins. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Loins of Beef Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Even after reading the above story about the Packer draft--words like flyer-potential-live dangerously--what the heck--is Ted drafting a free Espn league an wants to have everyone say--see I told you they would be outstanding citizens and football players--I don't see this draft adding to next years team in either points for or allowed--would enjoy being proved wrong Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Even after reading the above story about the Packer draft--words like flyer-potential-live dangerously--what the heck--is Ted drafting a free Espn league an wants to have everyone say--see I told you they would be outstanding citizens and football players--I don't see this draft adding to next years team in either points for or allowed--would enjoy being proved wrong What he said about Harrell being a pass rusher is the opposite of what many scouts have said. I hope he's right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swiss Cheezhead Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 To be totally honest, I feel MUCH better now that we've got good value at RB, WR and S. Harrell kinda seems like "gravy" now. B. Jackson -- I actually saw this kid quite a bit at Nebraska. The 'Huskers were really looking for somebody to step up at RB, and Jackson made the most of his opportunity. With each game, it seemed his talent became more and more obvious. Still, he wasn't featured until later in the '06 season, so everybody got the feeling that he might be even better than he looked. J. Jones -- I won't criticize TT for his WR value assessments. Both Jennings and Terrence Murphy proved that Thompson knows how to get good pass-catchers outside the first round. Rouse -- Everything I've read suggests he's a true mulitidimensional safety. He's not perfect in every one area, really, but he's adequate in all. With some good coaching, he's got a very high ceiling. He's also apparently just a great kid. Team-first guy, who had a great influence in the locker room. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 To be totally honest, I feel MUCH better now that we've got good value at RB, WR and S. Harrell kinda seems like "gravy" now. B. Jackson -- I actually saw this kid quite a bit at Nebraska. The 'Huskers were really looking for somebody to step up at RB, and Jackson made the most of his opportunity. With each game, it seemed his talent became more and more obvious. Still, he wasn't featured until later in the '06 season, so everybody got the feeling that he might be even better than he looked. I won't dispute this. He was drafted about where he was rated by both PFW and TSN, and may have been a slight bargain. You'd like a bit more production, but I don't watch much Nebraska ball so I've never seen the kid play. J. Jones -- I won't criticize TT for his WR value assessments. Both Jennings and Terrence Murphy proved that Thompson knows how to get good pass-catchers outside the first round. This is fair enough as well; one thing I noticed in taking a look at the PFW and TSN ratings is that while you obviously expect some divergence, there were tons of players just all over the place - consensus was tough to come by this year. TSN rated him as a 3rd rounder, PFW had him graded as a FA. Like you say, Swiss, given Thompson's track record, it may be best to defer to him - though it's fair to point out that while Murphy and Jennings looked like keepers, Cory Rodgers and Craig Bragg were absolute washouts. I'm not sure if 50/50 is above or below the Mendoza line in this category. Probably above. Rouse -- Everything I've read suggests he's a true mulitidimensional safety. He's not perfect in every one area, really, but he's adequate in all. With some good coaching, he's got a very high ceiling. He's also apparently just a great kid. Team-first guy, who had a great influence in the locker room. I've heard the dread "looks like Tarzan, plays like Jane" assessment bandied about. Part of the reason for his rotten senior season may have been that he was apparently playing through a hand injury. I might've leaned towards Eric Weddle; tough to gauge the value, as he was one of the guys there was HUGE disagreement on - TSN had him 33rd (TT = genius); PFW had him 114th (minor reach). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piratesownninjas Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 And another trade down... So unlike Ted Thompson... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piratesownninjas Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 What are the odds that TT is trying to trade 120 pick for a late 4th and a 7th? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piratesownninjas Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 And now the Seahawks have the 120th pick... Ted Thompson should trade away all of our picks and have the entire 7th round. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swiss Cheezhead Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 I won't dispute this. He was drafted about where he was rated by both PFW and TSN, and may have been a slight bargain. You'd like a bit more production, but I don't watch much Nebraska ball so I've never seen the kid play. This is fair enough as well; one thing I noticed in taking a look at the PFW and TSN ratings is that while you obviously expect some divergence, there were tons of players just all over the place - consensus was tough to come by this year. TSN rated him as a 3rd rounder, PFW had him graded as a FA. Like you say, Swiss, given Thompson's track record, it may be best to defer to him - though it's fair to point out that while Murphy and Jennings looked like keepers, Cory Rodgers and Craig Bragg were absolute washouts. I'm not sure if 50/50 is above or below the Mendoza line in this category. Probably above. I've heard the dread "looks like Tarzan, plays like Jane" assessment bandied about. Part of the reason for his rotten senior season may have been that he was apparently playing through a hand injury. I might've leaned towards Eric Weddle; tough to gauge the value, as he was one of the guys there was HUGE disagreement on - TSN had him 33rd (TT = genius); PFW had him 114th (minor reach). I understand about Rodgers and Bragg, but I wasn't really comparing 1st- and 2nd-day picks. As for Weddle, I would have LOVED to see him as a Packer, but he was off the board in the early 2nd round. Long gone by the time we took Rouse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chavez Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 His trading down resulted in a pretty freakin' good draft last year, IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.